The Human Truth Foundation

Which are the Best Countries in the World? The Social and Moral Development Index

https://www.humantruth.info/social_and_moral_index.html

By Vexen Crabtree 2025

#human_development #politics #social_development

--- The Best ---1
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank1
1Denmark26.9
2Norway29.1
3Sweden29.9
4Netherlands31.0
5Switzerland31.5
6Finland32.4
7Belgium36.7
8Luxembourg36.7
9Japan38.0
10Iceland38.0
q=200.
--- The Worst ---1
Pos.Higher is worse
Avg Rank1
200Somalia160.3
199S. Sudan152.9
198Western Sahara151.9
197Eritrea144.9
196Afghanistan142.0
195Angola140.9
194Equatorial Guinea136.1
193Sudan135.0
192Yemen130.8
191Congo, DR130.6
q=200.

Which countries set the best examples to the rest of the world? Which ones would we do best to copy, to emulate and to admire for their foresight, hard work and long-term conscience? Which countries would have humanity survive gleaming into a clean, happy, bright future?

And who are tardy on humanitarian issues, science or development? Which nations and cultures cling to barbarian ethics on gender and sexual equality? Who is holding us back?

The Social and Moral Development Index is a compilation of relevant statistics on a wide range of issues which are put into a database-driven formula which calculates points per country. The country's overall score is an average of all the datasets that a country appears in. So, countries don't get penalized for lack of data about them.

The result is a shortlist of countries that beat all the others. Be the best!


1. The Criteria: Human Rights & Tolerance

Human Rights & Tolerance

Overall Results across all decades:
Best: Sweden, Netherlands, Denmark
Regions: Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe2
Worst: Somalia, Eritrea, Saudi Arabia
Regions: The Middle East, Africa and Asia2
Constituent Data Sets: Human Rights & Tolerance
1. Press Freedom2025 Best: Norway, Estonia, Netherlands
2025 Worst: Eritrea, N. Korea, China

2010s: Norway, Finland, Netherlands, N. Korea, Eritrea, Turkmenistan

2000s: Finland, Norway, Iceland, N. Korea, Eritrea, Turkmenistan

2. SlaveryBest: Norway, Switzerland, 4-country draw
Worst: N. Korea, Eritrea, Mauritania

2020s (so far): Norway, Switzerland, 4-country draw, N. Korea, Eritrea, Mauritania

2010s: Japan, Canada, Taiwan, N. Korea, Eritrea, Burundi

3. Personal, Civil & Economic Freedom2014 Best: Hong Kong, Switzerland, New Zealand
2014 Worst: Libya, Yemen, Iran
4. Freedom in the World2024 Best: 41-country draw
2024 Worst: 14-country draw

2010s: 38-country draw, 5-country draw

2000s: 27-country draw, 5-country draw

1990s: 20-country draw, 9-country draw

1980s: 17-country draw, 7-country draw

1970s: 14-country draw, 6-country draw

5. Human Rights Watch Comments2017 Best: France, Germany, UK
2017 Worst: 10-country draw
6. Nominal Commitment to HR2009 Best: Argentina, 12-country draw
2009 Worst: Kiribati, Bhutan, 4-country draw
7. HR Treaties Lag2019 Best: Ecuador, Uruguay, Tunisia
2019 Worst: Palestine, Marshall Islands, Palau
Constituent Data Sets: Gender Equality
8. Gender Inequality2022 Best: Denmark, Norway, Switzerland
2022 Worst: Yemen, Papua New Guinea, Nigeria

2010s: Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, Yemen, Chad, Afghanistan

2000s: Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Niger

1990s: Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Yemen, Pakistan, UAE

9. Gender Biases2022 Best: Sweden, New Zealand, Australia
2022 Worst: Tajikistan, Qatar, Pakistan
10. Year Women Can VoteBest: New Zealand, Australia, Finland
Worst: Saudi Arabia, Vatican City, Kuwait
Constituent Data Sets: Prejudice
11. Anti-Semite Opinions2014 Best: Laos, Philippines, Sweden
2014 Worst: Iraq, Yemen, 2-country draw
12. LGBT EqualityBest: Germany, Spain, Portugal
Worst: Saudi Arabia, Mauritania, Eritrea

2020s (so far): Germany, Spain, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, Mauritania, Eritrea

2010s: S. Africa, Brazil, France, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, 4-country draw

2000s: Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan

1990s: Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan

1980s: Denmark, 9-country draw, Iran, Saudi Arabia, 4-country draw

1970s: 4-country draw, Saudi Arabia, 3-country draw

13. Freedom of Thought2021 Best: Belgium, Netherlands, Taiwan
2021 Worst: 4-country draw
> > > Details and Commentary on these data sets

2. The Criteria: Health

Health

Overall Results across all decades:
Best: Monaco, Liechtenstein, Japan
Regions: Scandinavia, Europe and The Mediterranean3
Worst: Angola, Somalia, S. Sudan
Regions: Africa, Micronesia and Melanesia3
Constituent Data Sets: Health
1. Life Expectancy2021 Best: Monaco, Hong Kong, Japan
2021 Worst: Chad, Nigeria, Lesotho

2010s: Monaco, Hong Kong, Japan, Lesotho, Chad, Nigeria

2000s: Monaco, Andorra, Japan, Swaziland, Lesotho, Zimbabwe

1990s: Andorra, Japan, San Marino, S. Sudan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone

2. Alcohol Consumption2016 Best: 5-country draw
2016 Worst: Moldova, Lithuania, Czechia
3. Fertility Rate2022 Best: Hong Kong, S. Korea, Puerto Rico
2022 Worst: Niger, Chad, Somalia

2010s: British Virgin Islands, S. Korea, Hong Kong, Niger, Somalia, Chad

2000s: Hong Kong, S. Korea, Andorra, Niger, Somalia, Chad

1990s: Spain, Hong Kong, Italy, S. Sudan, Niger, Afghanistan

1980s: Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Yemen, Niger, Rwanda

1970s: Germany, Luxembourg, Finland, Yemen, Rwanda, Libya

1960s: Latvia, Hungary, Estonia, Marshall Islands, Rwanda, Yemen

4. SmokingBest: Nigeria, Ghana, Panama
Worst: Nauru, Myanmar, Kiribati

2020s (so far): Nigeria, Ghana, Panama, Nauru, Myanmar, Kiribati

2010s: Ghana, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Nauru, Myanmar, Kiribati

2000s: Ethiopia, Ghana, Sao Tome & Principe, Kiribati, Myanmar, Nauru

5. Suicide Rate2013 Best: Grenada, Haiti, Egypt
2013 Worst: Lithuania, Russia, S. Korea
6. Food Aid, Health Contributions & WHO Compliance2017 Best: Sweden, Ireland, Denmark
2017 Worst: Angola, St Vincent & Grenadines, Mauritania
7. Overweight Adults1976 Best: Bangladesh, Vietnam, Nepal
1976 Worst: Nauru, Palau, Marshall Islands
8. Adult Obesity2022 Best: Vietnam, Timor-Leste (E. Timor), Ethiopia
2022 Worst: American Samoa, Tonga, Nauru

2010s: Vietnam, Timor-Leste (E. Timor), Ethiopia, American Samoa, Nauru, Tokelau

2000s: Vietnam, Timor-Leste (E. Timor), Ethiopia, American Samoa, Nauru, Tokelau

1990s: Vietnam, Timor-Leste (E. Timor), Ethiopia, Nauru, American Samoa, Tokelau

Constituent Data Sets: Children's Health
9. Adolescent Birth Rate2022 Best: Hong Kong, Denmark, S. Korea
2022 Worst: Niger, Mozambique, Central African Rep.

2010s: N. Korea, S. Korea, Switzerland, Niger, Mozambique, Mali

2000s: N. Korea, S. Korea, Hong Kong, Niger, Chad, Mali

1990s: S. Korea, Japan, N. Korea, Chad, Niger, Angola

10. Infant DTP ImmunizationsBest: 11-country draw
Worst: Sint Eustatius, Papua New Guinea, Central African Rep.

2020s (so far): 11-country draw, Sint Eustatius, Papua New Guinea, Central African Rep.

2010s: 12-country draw, Central African Rep., Chad, Somalia

2000s: Hungary, Anguilla, British Virgin Islands, Chad, S. Sudan, Somalia

1990s: Tokelau, Montserrat, 4-country draw, Chad, Niger, Afghanistan

1980s: 4-country draw, Niger, Sierra Leone, Bangladesh

11. 7x Infant Immunizations (2011-2015)2015 Best: China, Hungary, Uzbekistan
2015 Worst: Equatorial Guinea, S. Sudan, Somalia
12. Infant MortalityBest: San Marino, Finland, Luxembourg
Worst: S. Sudan, Somalia, Central African Rep.

2020s (so far): San Marino, Finland, Luxembourg, S. Sudan, Somalia, Central African Rep.

2010s: Singapore, Iceland, Sweden, Sierra Leone, Central African Rep., Niger

2000s: Sweden, Iceland, Singapore, Niger, Sierra Leone, Liberia

1990s: Iceland, Sweden, Finland, Niger, Liberia, Sierra Leone

1980s: Finland, Sweden, Japan, Niger, Sierra Leone, Mali

1970s: Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Cambodia, Mali, Niger

1960s: Sweden, Netherlands, Iceland, Mali, Yemen, Sierra Leone

> > > Details and Commentary on these data sets

3. The Criteria: The Environment

The Environment

Overall Results across all decades:
Best: Sri Lanka, Uruguay, Switzerland
Regions: Central America, South America and Scandinavia
Worst: Eritrea, Vatican City, Timor-Leste (E. Timor)
Regions: Micronesia, Australasia and Melanesia
Constituent Data Sets: The Environment
1. Forest Area Change 2000-2020Best: Guernsey, Bahrain, Iceland
Worst: Ivory Coast, Nicaragua, Gambia

2010s: Burundi, Bahrain, Malta, Egypt, Ivory Coast, Cambodia

2000s: Guernsey, Iceland, Bahrain, Nicaragua, Ivory Coast, Gambia

2. Environmental Performance2018 Best: Switzerland, France, Denmark
2018 Worst: Burundi, Bangladesh, Congo, DR
3. Energy to GDP Efficiency2022 Best: Rwanda, Chad, Tanzania
2022 Worst: Turkmenistan, Trinidad & Tobago, Bahrain

2010s: Chad, Rwanda, Burundi, Trinidad & Tobago, Iceland, Bahrain

2000s: Chad, Burundi, Rwanda, Bahrain, N. Korea, Trinidad & Tobago

1990s: Chad, Palestine, Mali, Bahrain, Qatar, Mongolia

1980s: Cambodia, Burundi, Nepal, Bahrain, Mongolia, Qatar

1970s: Bangladesh, Indonesia, Ecuador, Czechia, Luxembourg, Romania

1960s: Oman, Sri Lanka, Ecuador, Singapore, Luxembourg, Norway

4. International Accords on the EnvironmentBest: Sweden, Canada, Norway
Worst: Vatican City, Palestine, Andorra

2020s (so far): 143-country draw, Vatican City, USA, S. Sudan

2010s: Samoa, Mauritius, Belize, Vatican City, S. Sudan, Palestine

2000s: Panama, Netherlands, Czechia, Palestine, Vatican City, Iraq

1990s: El Salvador, Panama, Norway, 4-country draw

1980s: USA, Canada, Norway, 68-country draw

1970s: Canada, Mauritius, Nepal, 130-country draw

5. Rational Beliefs on the Environment2011 Best: Argentina, Greece, Brazil
2011 Worst: Turkmenistan, Albania, Haiti
6. Meat Consumption2021 Best: Congo, DR, Burundi, Bangladesh
2021 Worst: Hong Kong, USA, Nauru

2010s: Burundi, Congo, DR, Bangladesh, Hong Kong, Australia, USA

7. Green Future Index2023 Best: Iceland, Finland, Norway
2023 Worst: Iran, Algeria, Zambia
> > > Details and Commentary on these data sets

4. The Criteria: Modernity

Modernity

Overall Results across all decades:
Best: Vatican City, Finland, Belgium
Regions: Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe4
Worst: S. Sudan, Eritrea, Somalia
Regions: Melanesia, Africa and Micronesia4
Constituent Data Sets: Modernity
1. Research and Development2016 Best: S. Korea, Israel, Japan
2016 Worst: Lesotho, 3-country draw
2. Intellectual Endeavours2017 Best: Ukraine, Czechia, Hungary
2017 Worst: Angola, Iraq, Bolivia
3. Metric System Adoption Rate2025 Best: 26-country draw
2025 Worst: USA, Liberia, 3-country draw

2020s (so far): 26-country draw, USA, Liberia, 3-country draw

2010s: 26-country draw, USA, Myanmar, Liberia

2000s: 26-country draw, Myanmar, USA, Liberia

1990s: 26-country draw, Myanmar, USA, 2-country draw

1980s: 25-country draw, USA, Liberia, Myanmar

1970s: 25-country draw, Liberia, Myanmar, USA

1960s: 24-country draw, Myanmar, Liberia, USA

4. Religiosity2018 Best: China, Estonia, Czechia
2018 Worst: Ethiopia, Senegal, 2-country draw
5. IQ2006 Best: Singapore, Hong Kong, S. Korea
2006 Worst: 6-country draw
Constituent Data Sets: Education
6. Secondary Education2018 Best: 6-country draw
2018 Worst: Chad, Niger, Burkina Faso
7. Length of Schooling2021 Best: Australia, New Zealand, Greece
2021 Worst: S. Sudan, Niger, Mali

2010s: Australia, Belgium, Iceland, S. Sudan, Niger, Djibouti

2000s: Australia, Belgium, Iceland, Niger, Djibouti, Burkina Faso

1990s: Australia, Canada, Belgium, Niger, Djibouti, Ethiopia

8. Maths, Science & Reading2015 Best: Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan
2015 Worst: Dominican Rep., Algeria, Kosovo
Constituent Data Sets: Technology and Information
9. Internet Users2016 Best: Iceland, Faroe Islands, Norway
2016 Worst: Eritrea, Timor-Leste (E. Timor), Burundi
10. Freedom On The Internet2012 Best: Estonia, USA, Germany
2012 Worst: Iran, Cuba, China
11. IT Security2013 Best: Belize, Ireland, Luxembourg
2013 Worst: USA, Russia, India
12. IPv6 Uptake2017 Best: Belgium, Germany, Switzerland
2017 Worst: 59-country draw
13. Digital Quality of Life2024 Best: Germany, Finland, France
2024 Worst: Yemen, Congo, DR, Mozambique
> > > Details and Commentary on these data sets

5. The Criteria: National Culture

National Culture

Overall Results across all decades:
Best:
Regions:
Worst:
Regions:
Constituent Data Sets: National Culture
1. World Giving Index2022 Best: Indonesia, Kenya, USA
2022 Worst: Cambodia, Japan, 2-country draw

2010s: Myanmar, USA, New Zealand, China, Greece, Yemen

2. Corruption2022 Best: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand
2022 Worst: Somalia, S. Sudan, Syria

2010s: Denmark, New Zealand, Finland, Somalia, N. Korea, Afghanistan

2000s: Finland, Denmark, New Zealand, Somalia, Myanmar, Bangladesh

1990s: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Nigeria, Honduras, Paraguay

3. Happiness2024 Best: Finland, Denmark, Iceland
2024 Worst: Afghanistan, Sierra Leone, Lebanon

2010s: Denmark, Finland, Norway, S. Sudan, Central African Rep., Burundi

4. Creativity and Culture2017 Best: Belgium, Netherlands, Estonia
2017 Worst: Libya, Congo, DR, Rwanda
5. Passport ReachBest: Singapore, Japan, S. Korea
Worst: Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq

2020s (so far): Singapore, Japan, S. Korea, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq

2010s: Germany, Sweden, Finland, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia

2000s: Denmark, Finland, 2-country draw, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran

6. Open Trading, Aid and Development2017 Best: Ireland, Denmark, Sweden
2017 Worst: Equatorial Guinea, Brazil, Papua New Guinea
Constituent Data Sets: Peace Versus Instability
7. Global Peace Index2023 Best: Iceland, Denmark, Ireland
2023 Worst: Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria

2010s: Iceland, Denmark, Austria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia

8. Peacekeeping and Security2017 Best: Samoa, S. Africa, Tunisia
2017 Worst: Guinea-Bissau, Marshall Islands, Tonga
9. Refugees and UN Treaties2017 Best: Austria, Germany, Netherlands
2017 Worst: Brunei, Tonga, Fiji
10. Impact of Terrorism2019 Best: 13-country draw
2019 Worst: Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria
Constituent Data Sets: Economic Inequality and Poverty
11. PovertyBest: Malaysia, Bhutan, Cyprus
Worst: Congo, DR, Mozambique, Burundi

2020s (so far): Malaysia, Bhutan, Cyprus, Congo, DR, Mozambique, Burundi

2010s: Slovenia, Switzerland, Czechia, Congo, DR, Mozambique, S. Sudan

2000s: Luxembourg, Cyprus, Czechia, Congo, DR, Mozambique, Niger

1990s: Germany, Austria, Slovenia, Mali, Swaziland, Niger

1980s: UK, Taiwan, Norway, China, Indonesia, Nepal

12. Inequality in Life ExpectancyInformational only
13. Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient)

2010s: Slovenia, Ukraine, Slovakia, S. Africa, Haiti, Namibia

2000s: Slovenia, Denmark, Czechia, Botswana, Namibia, S. Africa

1990s: Finland, Slovakia, Denmark, Namibia, Malawi, Lesotho

1980s: Finland, Croatia, Hungary, Brazil, Panama, Guatemala

14. Multidimensional Poverty2018 Best: Armenia, Ukraine, Serbia
2018 Worst: Niger, S. Sudan, Chad
> > > Details and Commentary on these data sets

6. Results: All Countries From Best to Worst

#human_development

--- The Best ---1
Pos.
Avg Rank1
1Denmark26.9
2Norway29.1
3Sweden29.9
4Netherlands31.0
5Switzerland31.5
6Finland32.4
7Belgium36.7
8Luxembourg36.7
9Japan38.0
10Iceland38.0
11France38.2
12Germany38.8
13Austria39.3
14Monaco39.3
15Liechtenstein40.8
16New Zealand42.2
17Canada43.5
18Spain43.5
19Australia43.5
20Italy43.7
21Slovenia44.3
22Portugal45.6
23Ireland46.2
24Czechia48.8
25S. Korea48.9
26Taiwan50.0
27UK50.0
28Hungary52.6
29Uruguay52.8
30Poland52.8
31Cyprus54.3
32Slovakia55.0
33Estonia56.2
34Costa Rica56.2
35Malta56.2
36Greece56.7
37Singapore56.8
38San Marino57.5
39Latvia61.3
40Croatia61.8
41Chile62.0
42Lithuania62.7
43Israel63.3
44Mauritius66.0
45Andorra66.0
46USA66.1
47Bulgaria67.3
48Argentina67.9
49Romania69.2
50Montenegro69.4
51Brazil69.7
52Thailand69.8
53Serbia73.1
54Sri Lanka74.0
55Malaysia74.1
56Albania75.5
57Macedonia76.5
58Cuba77.1
59Mexico77.1
60Peru78.1
61Tunisia78.4
62Moldova78.5
63Ukraine78.5
64Barbados78.8
65Seychelles78.9
66Northern Cyprus79.1
67China79.9
q=200.
--- The Average ---1
Pos.
Avg Rank1
68Panama80.2
69Ecuador80.7
70Trinidad & Tobago80.7
71Vietnam80.9
72Colombia81.1
73Bosnia & Herzegovina81.5
74El Salvador81.9
75Turkey82.6
76Georgia82.9
77Kosovo83.1
78Philippines83.3
79Jamaica83.7
80Russia84.6
81Dominica84.7
82Morocco84.8
83Cape Verde84.8
84Dominican Rep.85.7
85Kazakhstan85.9
86Belarus86.0
87Vatican City86.3
88UAE86.5
89Antigua & Barbuda87.1
90Armenia87.2
91Kuwait87.5
92St Vincent & Grenadines87.8
93Fiji88.3
94Bahamas88.7
95Bolivia89.1
96Guatemala89.2
97S. Africa89.6
98St Kitts & Nevis90.4
99Mongolia90.6
100Indonesia90.6
101India91.5
102Grenada91.8
103Paraguay91.9
104Qatar92.0
105Bahrain92.5
106St Lucia92.6
107Kyrgyzstan93.2
108Brunei93.5
109Jordan93.7
110Suriname93.9
111Honduras93.9
112Nicaragua94.4
113Maldives94.5
114Ghana95.2
115Palau95.3
116Botswana95.4
117Venezuela95.7
118Tonga96.1
119Guyana96.4
120Uzbekistan96.5
121Oman97.1
122Nepal98.0
123Algeria98.2
124Lebanon98.3
125Belize99.3
126Azerbaijan99.8
127Egypt101.1
128Iran101.9
129Bhutan102.1
130Senegal102.6
131Kenya103.0
132Vanuatu104.0
133Tajikistan104.6
134Namibia105.6
q=200.
--- The Challenged ---1
Pos.
Avg Rank1
135Lesotho105.7
136Rwanda106.3
137Turkmenistan106.4
138Bangladesh106.6
139N. Korea106.9
140Samoa107.9
141Saudi Arabia108.1
142Gabon108.9
143Burkina Faso109.1
144Palestine109.1
145Micronesia109.3
146Sao Tome & Principe109.5
147Timor-Leste (E. Timor)109.9
148Tanzania110.1
149Madagascar110.9
150Tuvalu111.0
151Uganda111.1
152Cambodia112.1
153Somaliland112.4
154Gambia112.7
155Togo112.8
156Swaziland114.1
157Benin114.1
158Kiribati114.4
159Libya114.7
160Zambia115.1
161Mali115.3
162Ivory Coast115.4
163Djibouti115.9
164Congo, (Brazzaville)116.0
165Malawi116.8
166Nigeria116.9
167Pakistan117.9
168Haiti118.1
169Cameroon118.5
170Burundi119.0
171Sierra Leone119.8
172Syria120.1
173Laos120.4
174Ethiopia120.5
175Niger120.5
176Nauru120.6
177Solomon Islands121.0
178Guinea-Bissau121.1
179Zimbabwe121.8
180Marshall Islands123.1
181Guinea123.2
182Iraq123.7
183Comoros123.9
184Mozambique124.0
185Papua New Guinea124.1
186Mauritania125.1
187Myanmar126.5
188Liberia126.6
189Central African Rep.126.7
190Chad129.8
191Congo, DR130.6
192Yemen130.8
193Sudan135.0
194Equatorial Guinea136.1
195Angola140.9
196Afghanistan142.0
197Eritrea144.9
198Western Sahara151.9
199S. Sudan152.9
200Somalia160.3
q=200.

7. Methodology

The Social and Moral Development Index combines a large number of data sets - over 60 - into a single formula. It's not a simplistic ranking system - for most data sets, each country is given points according to where it sits on the scale ranging from the best country, to the worst country, on a scalar (and not linear) basis. The worst country in any given data set gets 0 points, and the best gets 100 points, and everyone else gets a portion of those points according to how close to the top they sit. It pays to be as good as possible. The points are not summed to form a total, because this would unfairly give advantages to countries that appear in most data sets - most data are not fully comprehensive. Each country gains a final score which is an average of its points from all datasets.

When it comes to presenting the results, charts show the best 5 countries marked with a green number, and the worst 5 marked with a red one. If there is a tie, then, the markers extend for as long as the tie continues. Sometimes the actual points are calculated to many significant figures, but, the results are only shown for 3 s.f. and in these cases, it might look like the flags do not extend enough. To view the data in more detail hover over any row to view the precise points awarded.