The Human Truth Foundation

Serbia (Republic of Serbia)

https://www.humantruth.info/serbia.html

By Vexen Crabtree 2025

#serbia

Serbia
Republic of Serbia
Flag
StatusIndependent State
Social and Moral Index55th best
CapitalBelgrade
Land Area 87 460km21
LocationEurope, The Balkans
Population8.8m2
Life Expectancy74.19yrs (2017)3
GNI$19 123 (2017)4
ISO3166-1 CodesRS, SRB, 6885
Internet Domain.rs, .yu6
CurrencyDinar (RSD)7
Telephone+3818

1. Overview

The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes was formed in 1918; its name was changed to Yugoslavia in 1929. Various paramilitary bands resisted Nazi Germany's occupation and division of Yugoslavia from 1941 to 1945, but fought each other and ethnic opponents as much as the invaders. The military and political movement headed by Josip "TITO" Broz (Partisans) took full control of Yugoslavia when German and Croatian separatist forces were defeated in 1945. Although Communist, TITO's new government and his successors (he died in 1980) managed to steer their own path between the Warsaw Pact nations and the West for the next four and a half decades. In 1989, Slobodan MILOSEVIC became president of the Republic of Serbia and his ultranationalist calls for Serbian domination led to the violent breakup of Yugoslavia along ethnic lines. In 1991, Croatia, Slovenia, and Macedonia declared independence, followed by Bosnia in 1992. The remaining republics of Serbia and Montenegro declared a new Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) in April 1992 and under MILOSEVIC's leadership, Serbia led various military campaigns to unite ethnic Serbs in neighboring republics into a "Greater Serbia." These actions were ultimately unsuccessful and led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Accords in 1995. MILOSEVIC retained control over Serbia and eventually became president of the FRY in 1997. In 1998, an ethnic Albanian insurgency in the formerly autonomous Serbian province of Kosovo provoked a Serbian counterinsurgency campaign that resulted in massacres and massive expulsions of ethnic Albanians living in Kosovo. The MILOSEVIC government's rejection of a proposed international settlement led to NATO's bombing of Serbia in the spring of 1999, to the withdrawal of Serbian military and police forces from Kosovo in June 1999, and to the stationing of a NATO-led force in Kosovo to provide a safe and secure environment for the region's ethnic communities. FRY elections in late 2000 led to the ouster of MILOSEVIC and the installation of democratic government. In 2003, the FRY became Serbia and Montenegro, a loose federation of the two republics. Widespread violence predominantly targeting ethnic Serbs in Kosovo in March 2004 caused the international community to open negotiations on the future status of Kosovo in January 2006. In June 2006, Montenegro seceded from the federation and declared itself an independent nation. Serbia subsequently gave notice that it was the successor state to the union of Serbia and Montenegro. In February 2008, after nearly two years of inconclusive negotiations, the UN-administered province of Kosovo declared itself independent of Serbia - an action Serbia refuses to recognize. At Serbia's request, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) in October 2008 sought an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on whether Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence was in accordance with international law. In a ruling considered unfavorable to Serbia, the ICJ issued an advisory opinion in July 2010 stating that international law did not prohibit declarations of independence. In late 2010, Serbia agreed to an EU-drafted UNGA Resolution acknowledging the ICJ's decision and calling for a new round of talks between Serbia and Kosovo, this time on practical issues rather than Kosovo's status. The EU-moderated Belgrade-Pristina dialogue began in March 2011 and was raised to the level of prime ministers in October 2012.

CIA's The World Factbook (2013)9

Book CoverSerbia´s long history of multiculturalism and intellectual thought, rich folklore and thriving art and music scenes make it a must-see in the Balkans. During the 1990s Serbia went from being the powerhouse of Yugoslavia to the bully of the Balkans. But reputations can be remade as quickly as they may be lost. Everything you never heard about Serbia is true: it is warm, welcoming and a hell of a lot of fun. Today, the Serbs´ sense of industry, creativity and initiative sees their homeland resuming a pivotal role in the region.Exuding a feisty mix of élan and inat (Serbian trait of rebellious defiance), this country doesn´t do `mild´: Belgrade is one of the world´s wildest party destinations, Novi Sad hosts the rockingly hedonistic EXIT music festival, and even its hospitality is emphatic - expect to be greeted with rakija and a hearty three-kiss hello.

While political correctness is about as commonplace as a nonsmoking bar, Serbia is nevertheless a cultural crucible: there´s the art nouveau town of Subotica, bohemian Niš, and the minaret-studded Novi Pazar, which nudges some of the most sacred sites in Serbian Orthodoxy.

"The World" by Lonely Planet (2014)10

2. Serbia National and Social Development

#economics #human_development #wealth

UN HDI (2021)11
Pos.Higher is better
Value11
1Switzerland0.962
2Norway0.961
3Iceland0.959
...
62Malaysia0.803
63=Mauritius0.802
63=Georgia0.802
63=Serbia0.802
66Thailand0.800
67Albania0.796
68=Grenada0.795
68=Bulgaria0.795
Europe Avg0.87
World Avg0.72
q=191.
Gross National Income Per-Capita (2021)11
Pos.Higher is better
PPP $11
1Liechtenstein$146 830
2Singapore$90 919
3Qatar$87 134
...
64Argentina$20 925
65Montenegro$20 839
66Costa Rica$19 974
67Serbia$19 123
68Belarus$18 849
69Dominican Rep.$17 990
70Mexico$17 896
71Nauru$17 730
Europe Avg$40 512
World Avg$20 136
q=193.
Social & Moral
Development Index
12
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank12
1Denmark28.1
2Norway31.2
3Switzerland32.9
...
52Montenegro72.1
53Malaysia72.9
54Brazil73.7
55Serbia75.5
56Albania75.9
57Macedonia77.5
58Jamaica77.6
59Trinidad & Tobago77.9
Europe Avg55.7
World Avg88.7
q=199.

The United Nations produces an annual Human Development Report which includes the Human Development Index. The factors taken into account include life expectancy, education and schooling and Gross National Income (GNI) amongst many others..

The Social and Moral Development Index concentrates on moral issues and human rights, violence, public health, equality, tolerance, freedom and effectiveness in climate change mitigation and environmentalism, and on some technological issues. A country scores higher for achieving well in those areas, and for sustaining that achievement in the long term. Those countries towards the top of this index can truly said to be setting good examples and leading humankind onwards into a bright, humane, and free future. See: Which are the Best Countries in the World? The Social and Moral Development Index.

3. Serbia's Demographics and Migration

#birth_control #demographics #fertility #health #immigration #life_expectancy #longevity #migration #overpopulation #population #yemen

Population Datasets:

Serbia's population is predicted to rise to 9.479 million by 2030. This rise is despite a low fertility rate, meaning, that this country is helping to alleviate problems with growing population in neighbouring countries by accepting immigrants, very likely as a requirement of maintaining an active workforce. This country has a fertility rate of 1.63. The fertility rate is, in simple terms, the average amount of children that each woman has. The higher the figure, the quicker the population will grow, although, to calculate the rate you also need to take into account morbidity - the rate at which people die. If people live healthy and long lives and morbidity is low, then, 2.0 approximates to the replacement rate (two new children for each set of parents who die), which would keep the population stable. If all countries had such a fertility rate, population growth would end. The actual replacement rate in most developed countries is around 2.1. The highest fertility rate ever detected in a single year was in Yemen in 1985, at 8.86.13

Population2
Pos.2018
Population2
1China1.4b
2India1.4b
3USA327.1m
...
94Belarus9.5m
95Tajikistan9.1m
96Austria8.9m
97Serbia8.8m
98Papua New Guinea8.6m
99Switzerland8.5m
100Israel8.4m
101Togo7.9m
World Avg39.0m
q=195.
Life Expectancy
Higher is better
11
Pos.2021
Years11
1Monaco85.9
2Hong Kong85.5
3Japan84.8
...
64Brunei74.6
65Hungary74.5
66Jordan74.3
67Serbia74.2
68Romania74.2
69Cape Verde74.1
70Morocco74.0
71Iran73.9
World Avg71.28
q=195.
Fertility Rate
2.0 is best
14
Pos.202214
1US Virgin Islands2.00
2Ecuador2.00
3Nepal2.01
...
56Guatemala2.35
57Barbados1.63
58Guyana2.37
59=Serbia1.63
59=Australia1.63
61Brazil1.63
62Czechia1.62
63St Martin2.39
World Avg2.47
q=208.
Old-Age Dependency Ratio
Lower is better
15
Pos.2016
Per 10015
1Uganda04.3
2Mali04.5
3=Chad04.7
...
147Albania31.8
148Norway32.2
149Iceland32.5
150Serbia32.7
151Hungary32.9
152Romania33.6
153USA33.8
154New Zealand34.9
World Avg18.3
q=185.

Migration Datasets:

Immigrants16
Pos.2017
%16
1UAE88.4%
2Kuwait75.5%
3Qatar65.2%
...
59Italy10.0%
60Gambia9.8%
61Dominica9.2%
62Serbia9.1%
63Ivory Coast9.0%
64Malaysia8.5%
65Portugal8.5%
66Suriname8.5%
World Avg9.4%
q=195.
Emigrants17
Pos.2010
%17
1Dominica104.8%
2Palestine68.4%
3Samoa67.3%
...
153Sudan2.2%
154Chad2.1%
155Australia2.1%
156Serbia2.0%
157Venezuela1.8%
158S. Africa1.7%
159Iran1.7%
160Libya1.7%
World Avg11.5%
q=192.

4. Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance

#equality #freedom #gender_equality #human_rights #morals #politics #prejudice #serbia #serbia_human_rights #tolerance

Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025)18
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank18
1Sweden6.1
2Denmark8.6
3Norway9.0
...
49Romania61.3
50Andorra61.5
51Ukraine63.6
52Serbia63.7
53Mauritius63.7
54Jamaica64.1
Europe Avg47.37
World Avg86.55
q=199.
Serbia does relatively well in ensuring human rights and freedom, compared to many other countries. Serbia does the second-best in its nominal commitment to Human Rights19. It does better than average in terms of the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators)20, opposing gender inequality21, LGBT equality22, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports23 (but one of the lowest in Europe), eliminating modern slavery24, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms25 (but bad for Europe), freethought26 (but high for Europe) and in its average Freedom in the World rating (but high for Europe). Serbia still has work to do. Serbia does worse than average in its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice27 and in supporting press freedom28. Attacks and threats against journalists continue with an inedquate response from the government, and in fact pro-government media outlets continued engage in "smear campaigns against independent outlets and journalists"29. Rather than help them protect their people, government officials and institutions treat human rights defenders with hostility29.

For tables, charts and commentary, see:

5. Serbia's Health

#alcohol #birth_control #demographics #health #life_expectancy #longevity #mental_health #obesity #overpopulation #parenting #population #serbia #smoking #suicide #vaccines

Compared to Europe (2025)30
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank30
1Monaco12.4
2Liechtenstein30.1
3San Marino30.6
...
33Albania79.0
34Hungary79.5
35Bosnia & Herzegovina81.5
36Serbia82.2
37Lithuania82.2
38Belarus82.3
39Bulgaria83.5
40Armenia85.7
41Latvia87.8
Europe Avg86.87
q=48.
Health (2025)30
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank30
1Monaco12.4
2Liechtenstein30.1
3San Marino30.6
...
65Grenada81.0
66Bosnia & Herzegovina81.5
67Uruguay81.6
68Serbia82.2
69Lithuania82.2
70Belarus82.3
71Bulgaria83.5
72Colombia84.3
World Avg96.86
q=204.

The countries with the best overall approach to public health, in terms of both public policy and individual lifestyle choices, are Monaco, Liechtenstein and San Marino31. These countries are worth emulating. And, although often through no fault of the average citizen, the worst countries are Angola, Somalia and S. Sudan31.

36 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on its average life expectancy, its alcohol consumption rate, its fertility rate, its smoking rate, its suicide rate, its food aid and health contributions and WHO compliance, the prevalence of overweight adults, obesity rate, its adolescent birth rate, its immunizations take-up and childhood mortality in the 2020s (so far). The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Europe and The Mediterranean31, whereas the worst are Micronesia, Africa and Melanesia31.

For more, see:

Health Datasets:

Serbia has some poor policies and cultural issues which cause some public health problems. Serbia does better than average for childhood mortality in the 2020s (so far)32, its adolescent birth rate33 (but bad for Europe), its fertility rate14, its average life expectancy11 (but bad for Europe) and in its immunizations take-up34 (but low for Europe). Serbia still has work to do. Serbia does worse than average for its food aid and health contributions and WHO compliance35 (one of the highest in Europe), the prevalence of overweight adults36 and in its alcohol consumption rate37. And finally, it falls into the worst 20 for its suicide rate38 and in its smoking rate39. The number of overweight adults has increased by 14% during the last 40 years. Life expectancy in Serbia improved by +6.4yrs in the 30 years from 1990, less than the global average of +7.9yrs. Serbia has had a long-term consistent fertility rate, and is one of only 22 countries to vary by less than 1.0 each decade since the 1960s. Its peak fertility rate was 2.11 in 1960.

Life Expectancy
Higher is better
11
Pos.2021
Years11
1Monaco85.9
2Hong Kong85.5
3Japan84.8
...
64Brunei74.6
65Hungary74.5
66Jordan74.3
67Serbia74.2
68Romania74.2
69Cape Verde74.1
70Morocco74.0
71Iran73.9
Europe Avg78.36
World Avg71.28
q=195.
Alcohol Consumption
Lower is better
37
Pos.2016
Per Capita37
1Bangladesh0.0
2Kuwait0.0
3Libya0.0
...
159=Finland10.7
160Uruguay10.8
161=Cyprus10.8
162Serbia11.1
163Belarus11.2
164=Andorra11.3
164=Equatorial Guinea11.3
166Hungary11.4
Europe Avg10.3
World Avg6.2
q=189.
Fertility Rate
2.0 is best
14
Pos.202214
1US Virgin Islands2.00
2Ecuador2.00
3Nepal2.01
...
56Guatemala2.35
57Barbados1.63
58Guyana2.37
59=Serbia1.63
59=Australia1.63
61Brazil1.63
62Czechia1.62
63St Martin2.39
Europe Avg1.53
World Avg2.47
q=208.

Smoking in the 2020s
Lower is better
39
Pos.Total
%39
1Nigeria3.3%
2Ghana3.4%
3Panama5.2%
...
158Indonesia38.2%
159Timor-Leste (E. Timor)38.8%
160Bulgaria39.5%
161Serbia39.6%
162Papua New Guinea39.7%
163Kiribati39.7%
164Myanmar44.4%
165Nauru48.3%
Europe Avg27.0%
World Avg20.0%
q=165.

In the 2010s, Serbia was one of only 10 countries that had an average smoking rate of over 40% of the population.

Suicide Rate38
Pos.2013
Per 100k38
1Haiti0
2Grenada0
3Egypt0.1
...
75Switzerland36.2
76Croatia36.4
77Estonia37.9
78Serbia38.1
79Finland39
80Belgium39.1
81Slovenia44
82Ukraine44.8
Europe Avg26.99
World Avg20.93
q=91.
Food Aid, Health Contributions & WHO Compliance
Lower is better
35
Pos.2017
Rank35
1Sweden1
2Ireland2
3Denmark3
...
103Barbados103
104Venezuela104
105Timor-Leste (E. Timor)105
106Serbia106
107Zimbabwe107
108Central African Rep.108
109Benin109
110Costa Rica110
Europe Avg47.4
World Avg82.0
q=163.
Overweight Adults
Lower is better
36
Pos.1976
%36
1Bangladesh4.7
2Vietnam5.1
3Nepal5.4
...
129Fiji35.6
130Finland35.7
131Slovenia36.1
132=Serbia36.5
132=Norway36.5
132=Romania36.5
135Denmark36.7
136Slovakia37.0
Europe Avg38.2
World Avg27.1
q=191.
Adult Obesity
Lower is better
40
Pos.2022
%40
1Vietnam2.1%
2Timor-Leste (E. Timor)2.2%
3Ethiopia2.4%
...
105Iran25.3%
106Bosnia & Herzegovina25.5%
107Moldova25.6%
108Serbia26.1%
109Belarus26.6%
110Albania26.6%
111Estonia26.7%
112Ecuador27.0%
Europe Avg25.9%
World Avg24.7%
q=199.

Children's Health Datasets:

Adolescent Birth Rate
Lower is better
33
Pos.2022
Per 100033
1Hong Kong1.6
2Denmark1.8
3S. Korea2.1
...
54Algeria11.6
55Saudi Arabia11.6
56New Zealand11.8
57Serbia14.4
58Albania14.5
59Russia14.5
60USA15.1
61Ukraine15.2
Europe Avg11.4
World Avg43.8
q=195.
Infant Immunizations 2011-2015
Higher is better
34
Pos.2015
Avg %34
1=Hungary99.0
1=China99.0
3Uzbekistan98.9
...
87Austria93.8
88Argentina93.7
89Bulgaria93.7
90Serbia93.5
91Egypt93.4
92Cape Verde93.4
93Burundi93.3
94Chile93.3
Europe Avg92.7
World Avg88.3
q=194.
Infant Mortality (2020s)
Lower is better32
Pos.Total
Per 100032
1San Marino2.11
2Finland2.59
3Luxembourg2.60
...
39New Zealand5.66
40Cuba6.25
41Slovakia6.31
42Serbia6.52
43Malta6.58
44Bosnia & Herzegovina6.75
45USA6.83
46Turks & Caicos Islands6.89
Europe Avg6.30
World Avg32.19
q=195.

6. Serbia's Responsibility Towards The Environment

#biodiversity #climate_change #deforestation #environmentalism #food #internationalism #meat #over-exploitation #serbia #the_environment #veganism #vegetarianism

Compared to Europe (2025)41
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank41
1Switzerland45.0
2Denmark50.4
3Liechtenstein56.8
...
40Montenegro97.3
41Azerbaijan101.2
42Bosnia & Herzegovina103.5
43Serbia104.8
44Armenia108.2
45Belarus116.0
46San Marino134.9
47Andorra136.3
48Vatican City138.3
Europe Avg86.45
q=48.
Responsibility Towards The Environment (2025)41
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank41
1Sri Lanka34.9
2Uruguay43.2
3Switzerland45.0
...
161USA103.8
162Lebanon103.9
163Papua New Guinea104.5
164Serbia104.8
165Haiti105.8
166Samoa107.0
167Bahrain107.9
168Mongolia108.1
World Avg84.93
q=199.

We have known for a long term that we must protect the environment from habitation destruction, over-exploitation, pollution, and the emissions that cause climate change. In 1998, Greenpeace wrote that "Environment can no longer be meaningfully separated from health, quality of life, democracy, education, economy or trade"42. What countries have been doing the right thing, via legislation and national culture? All countries' current and historical approach towards the environment is gauged via 21 datasets, including multiple decades of data on its forested percent change 2000-2020, its environmental performance, energy to GDP efficiency, its sign-up rate to major international accords on protecting the environment, the rate of rational beliefs on the environment in the population, reducing annual meat consumption per person and its score on the Green Future Index.

The countries that do the best (Sri Lanka, Uruguay and Switzerland) tend to have avoided the excesses of early industrial countries, and have not yet repeated the same mistakes of environmental destruction - at least, not on the same scale. The regions with the best average results per country are Central America, South America and Scandinavia. The worst are Eritrea, The Vatican City and Timor-Leste (E. Timor), and the worst regions Micronesia, Australasia and Melanesia.

For more, see:

In terms of its responsibility towards the environment, Serbia ranks 164th in the world. This rank is computed from 21 data sets. Serbia does better than average in terms of its forested percent change 2000-202043, the rate of rational beliefs on the environment in the population44 and in its environmental performance45 (but bad for Europe). Serbia does not succeed in everything, however. Serbia does worse than average in energy to GDP efficiency46 and in reducing annual meat consumption per person47. And finally, it falls into the worst 20 in terms of its sign-up rate to major international accords on protecting the environment.

Forest Area Change 2000-2020
Higher is better
43
Pos.Total43
1Guernsey82.6%
2Bahrain75.2%
3Iceland64.7%
...
27Moldova11.9%
28Palestine11.5%
29Kyrgyzstan11.1%
30Serbia10.6%
31Turkey10.0%
32Denmark9.8%
33Kazakhstan9.7%
34Lithuania8.9%
Europe Avg8.2%
World Avg-0.1%
q=234.

From 2000 to 2010, Serbia restored its forest cover by 10%, from 2460 thousand hectares to 2713 thousand, although sadly from 2010 to 2020, it did not make further increases.

Environmental Performance
Higher is better
45
Pos.201845
1Switzerland87.4
2France84.0
3Denmark81.6
...
81Belize57.8
82Philippines57.7
83Mongolia57.5
84=Serbia57.5
84=Chile57.5
86Saudi Arabia57.5
87Ecuador57.4
88Algeria57.2
Europe Avg69.6
World Avg56.4
q=180.
Energy to GDP Efficiency
Lower is better
46
Pos.2022
Avg46
1Rwanda0.25
2Chad0.26
3Tanzania0.31
...
137UAE1.73
138Zimbabwe1.74
139Saudi Arabia1.76
140Serbia1.79
141Paraguay1.79
142Jamaica1.83
143Moldova1.88
144S. Africa1.97
Europe Avg1.25
World Avg1.23
q=165.
International Accords on the Environment
Higher is better
Pos.Total
Avg Rate
1Sweden83%
2Canada82%
3Norway81%
...
177Niue42%
178Solomon Islands42%
179Marshall Islands42%
180Serbia41%
181Grenada41%
182Afghanistan41%
183Tuvalu40%
184Sao Tome & Principe40%
Europe Avg62.7%
World Avg57.5%
q=197.
Rational Beliefs on the Environment
Higher is better
44
Pos.2011
%44
1Argentina78.3%
2Greece77.6%
3Brazil77.1%
...
63Jordan41.4%
64India41.2%
65Canada41.2%
66Serbia41.1%
67Ghana40.4%
68Moldova40.4%
69Cameroon39.0%
70Uganda38.6%
Europe Avg33.6%
World Avg39.9%
q=145.
Meat Consumption
Lower is better
47
Pos.2021
kg47
1Congo, DR03.0
2Burundi03.5
3Bangladesh04.3
...
137Austria76.4
138Germany76.6
139Greece76.8
140Serbia77.6
141Russia78.4
142Bolivia78.4
143Grenada78.6
144Ireland80.2
Europe Avg71.1
World Avg52.5
q=185.

7. Serbia's Modernity and Learning

#education #modernity #religion #religiosity #research #science #secularisation #technology #the_internet

Compared to Europe (2020)48
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank48
1Finland7.1
2Belgium12.9
3Denmark13.6
...
33Belarus51.5
34Cyprus55.6
35Turkey55.9
36Serbia57.1
37Montenegro64.9
38Bosnia & Herzegovina65.6
39Georgia65.6
40Moldova68.9
41Albania76.4
Europe Avg39.81
q=45.
Modernity & Learning (2020)48
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank48
1Finland7.1
2Belgium12.9
3Denmark13.6
...
51Cyprus55.6
52Turkey55.9
53S. Africa56.9
54Serbia57.1
55Uruguay57.6
56Malaysia59.4
57Kazakhstan59.8
58=Saudi Arabia62.0
World Avg86.31
q=190.

The most modern countries, with the best results from education, the highest levels of research, and with the easiest access to information on the Internet, are Finland, Belgium and Denmark49. The worst countries are Eritrea, S. Sudan and Sierra Leone49. Despite improves in global education, access to tertiary (adult) education is becoming increasingly unequal between the rich haves and the poor have-nots50.

Education, at all levels and ages, is the single most vital support for equality as well as being a country's most vital economic and social resource. [...] Every successful aspirant to modernisation and economic development, from Japan to South Korea, China to Chile, has got there with a big emphasis on education.

Bill Emmott (2017)51

15 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on Research and Development, Secondary Education, Length of Schooling, Intellectual Endeavours, Maths, Science & Reading, Religiosity, IQ, the percent of citizens with access to the internet, Freedom On The Internet, IT Security, IPv6 Uptake and digital quality of life. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe49, whereas the worst are Melanesia, Africa and Micronesia49.

For more, see:

Modernity and Education Datasets:

Research & Development
Higher is better
Pos.2016
% RDP PPP
1S. Korea4.2952
2Israel4.1152
3Japan3.5852
...
43Ukraine0.7653
44=Morocco0.7354
44=S. Africa0.7355
44=Serbia0.7353
44=Hong Kong0.7355
48Tunisia0.6855
49=Egypt0.6853
50Belarus0.6753
Europe Avg1.32
World Avg0.84
q=126.
Secondary Education
Higher is better
56
Pos.201856
1=Luxembourg100.0%
1=Estonia100.0%
1=Austria100.0%
...
39Australia90.4%
40Romania90.0%
41Botswana90.0%
42Serbia89.5%
43Denmark89.3%
44Israel89.1%
45Sweden88.9%
46Mongolia88.8%
Europe Avg88.3%
World Avg63.0%
q=169.
Length of Schooling
Higher is better
57
Pos.2021
Years57
1Australia21.1
2New Zealand20.3
3Greece20.0
...
76Cuba14.4
77Colombia14.4
78Moldova14.4
79Serbia14.4
80Luxembourg14.4
81China14.2
82Romania14.2
83Antigua & Barbuda14.2
Europe Avg16.1
World Avg13.5
q=193.
Intellectual Endeavours
Lower is better
35
Pos.2017
Rank35
1Ukraine1
2Czechia2
3Hungary3
...
25S. Africa25
26Singapore26
27Greece27
28Serbia28
29Canada29
30Romania30
31Cyprus31
32Ireland32
Europe Avg31.3
World Avg82.0
q=163.
Religiosity
Lower is better
58
Pos.2018
%58
1China3
2Estonia6
3Czechia7
...
33=Uzbekistan29
33=Uruguay29
35Poland30
36Serbia34
37=Israel36
37=Portugal36
39Azerbaijan38
40Chile41
Europe Avg25.8
World Avg54.3
q=106.

Technology and Information Datasets:

Internet Users
Higher is better
59
Pos.201659
1Iceland100%
2Faroe Islands99%
3Norway98%
...
88Costa Rica56%
89Kazakhstan56%
90=US Virgin Islands54%
90=Serbia54%
92Maldives54%
93Georgia53%
94China52%
95=Vietnam52%
Europe Avg76.7%
World Avg48.1%
q=201.
IPv6 Uptake
Higher is better
60
Pos.2017
Ratio60
1Belgium55.4
2Germany41.8
3Switzerland35.1
...
76=Panama0.1
76=Croatia0.1
76=Costa Rica0.1
76=Serbia0.1
80Liechtenstein0.0
81=Cyprus0.0
82Philippines0.0
83=Macedonia0.0
Europe Avg8.11
World Avg3.82
q=176.
Digital Quality of Life
Higher is better
61
Pos.202461
1Germany77.9%
2Finland76.9%
3France73.9%
...
45China54.8%
46Uruguay54.8%
47Ukraine54.4%
48Serbia53.5%
49Turkey52.2%
50Russia52.1%
51Thailand51.4%
52Bahrain51.1%
Europe Avg61.0%
World Avg48.4%
q=121.

8. Serbia's Culture, Peace and Inequality

#capitalism #charitability #charity #corruption #culture #economics #equality #extremism #happiness #health #human_development #inequality #life_expectancy #morals #peace #politics #poverty #religious_violence #serbia #social_development #terrorism

Compared to Europe (2020)62
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank62
1Denmark12.2
2Netherlands14.0
3Norway14.1
...
30Moldova57.1
31=Albania61.3
32Bulgaria61.3
33Serbia62.4
34Bosnia & Herzegovina63.9
35Greece64.8
36Kosovo66.2
37Belarus72.6
38Montenegro72.6
Europe Avg48.48
q=44.
Culture, Peace & Inequality (2020)62
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank62
1Denmark12.2
2Netherlands14.0
3Norway14.1
...
54Bulgaria61.3
55Israel61.6
56Oman61.8
57Serbia62.4
58Bosnia & Herzegovina63.9
59Greece64.8
60Jamaica65.5
61Kosovo66.2
World Avg76.86
q=178.

This is the final pillar of the Social and Moral Development Index; it has 28 datasets, including multiple decades of data on World Giving Index, resisting corruption, overall happiness, Creativity and Culture, Open Trading, Aid and Development, its Global Peace Index rating, Peacekeeping and Security, Refugees and UN Treaties, the impact of terrorism, poverty in the 2020s (so far), Inequality in Life Expectancy, Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient) and Multidimensional Poverty.

For more, see:

National Culture Datasets:

World Giving Index
Higher is better
63
Pos.2022
%63
1Indonesia68.0
2Kenya61.0
3USA59.0
...
19=Philippines47.0
19=Argentina47.0
19=Poland47.0
22Serbia46.0
23=Netherlands46.0
23=Jamaica46.0
23=Russia46.0
23=Iceland46.0
Europe Avg39.0
World Avg39.6
q=125.
Corruption
Higher is better
64
Pos.2022
Points64
1Denmark90.0
2=Finland87.0
2=New Zealand87.0
...
98Morocco38.0
99Ivory Coast37.0
100=Lesotho37.0
101Serbia36.0
102=Peru36.0
102=Turkey36.0
102=Sri Lanka36.0
102=Panama36.0
Europe Avg57.61
World Avg42.98
q=180.

Throughout the 2000s, Serbia made serious improvements to its Corruption Perception Index score and sat amongst the top-10 best-improvers that decade.

Happiness
Higher is better
65
Pos.2024
Score65
1Finland7.7
2Denmark7.5
3Iceland7.5
...
28Uruguay6.7
29Kosovo6.7
30Kuwait6.6
31Serbia6.6
32Saudi Arabia6.6
33France6.6
34Singapore6.6
35Romania6.6
Europe Avg6.37
World Avg5.58
q=147.
Creativity & Culture
Lower is better
35
Pos.2017
Rank35
1Belgium1
2Netherlands2
3Estonia3
...
30Spain30
31Romania31
32Costa Rica32
33Serbia33
34S. Korea34
35New Zealand35
36Belize36
37Iceland37
Europe Avg35.0
World Avg82.0
q=163.
Open Trading, Aid & Development
Lower is better
35
Pos.2017
Rank35
1Ireland1
2Denmark2
3Sweden3
4Netherlands4
5Switzerland5
6Serbia6
7Belgium7
8Norway8
9Finland9
10Croatia10
11Georgia11
12Philippines12
Europe Avg42.6
World Avg82.0
q=163.

Peace Versus Instability Datasets:

Global Peace Index
Lower is better
66
Pos.2023
Score66
1Iceland1.12
2Denmark1.31
3Ireland1.31
...
62Jordan1.90
63Zambia1.90
64Cyprus1.90
65Serbia1.92
66Armenia1.93
67France1.94
68Panama1.94
69Paraguay1.94
Europe Avg1.70
World Avg2.07
q=163.
Peacekeeping & Security
Lower is better
35
Pos.2017
Rank35
1Samoa1
2S. Africa2
3Tunisia3
...
81Gabon81
82Russia82
83Iran83
84Serbia84
85Mexico85
86Cambodia86
87Bangladesh87
88Honduras88
Europe Avg84.6
World Avg82.0
q=163.
Refugees & UN Treaties
Lower is better
35
Pos.2017
Rank35
1Austria1
2Germany2
3Netherlands3
...
42Iceland42
43Hungary43
44Kenya44
45Serbia45
46Bolivia46
47Japan47
48Czechia48
49Argentina49
Europe Avg37.8
World Avg82.0
q=163.
Impact of Terrorism
Lower is better
67
Pos.2019
Score67
1Togo0.00
2Mongolia0.00
3Swaziland0.00
...
24Lesotho0.10
25Liberia0.11
26=Moldova0.12
26=Serbia0.12
26=Estonia0.12
29New Zealand0.14
30Uruguay0.17
31Dominican Rep.0.18
Europe Avg1.62
World Avg2.78
q=150.

Economic Inequality and Poverty Datasets:

Poverty (2020s)
Lower is better
68
Pos.Total
%68
1Malaysia0.01%
2Bhutan0.01%
3Cyprus0.02%
...
53Vietnam1.45%
54Romania1.65%
55Armenia1.86%
56Serbia1.92%
57Costa Rica1.99%
58Palestine2.07%
59Suriname2.18%
60Montenegro2.37%
Europe Avg1.20%
World Avg11.40%
q=106.
Inequality in Life Expectancy
Lower is better69
Pos.201969
1Iceland2.40
2=Singapore2.50
2=Hong Kong2.50
...
34Belarus4.40
35=Canada4.60
35=Malta4.60
37Serbia4.90
38Slovakia5.00
39Cuba5.10
40UAE5.20
41=Bosnia & Herzegovina5.40
Europe Avg4.86
World Avg14.59
q=184.
Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient)
Lower is better
70
Pos.2023
%70
1Slovakia24.1%71
2Slovenia24.3%71
3Belarus24.4%72
...
59=Japan32.9%73
59=S. Korea32.9%71
61Bosnia & Herzegovina33.0%74
62Serbia33.1%71
63=Guinea-Bissau33.4%71
63=Bangladesh33.4%75
65Macedonia33.5%76
66=Georgia33.5%75
Europe Avg30.7%
World Avg36.5%
q=167.
Multidimensional Poverty
Lower is better
77
Pos.2018
Severity77
1Armenia.001
2Ukraine.001
3Serbia.001
4Turkmenistan.001
5Jordan.002
6Kazakhstan.002
7Montenegro.002
8Trinidad & Tobago.002
9Maldives.003
10Albania.003
11Thailand.003
12Moldova.004
Europe Avg.004
World Avg.154
q=101.

9. Religion and Beliefs

#buddhism #christianity #hinduism #islam #judaism #religion #religiosity #secularisation

Religiosity (2018)58
Pos.Lower is better
%58
1China3
2Estonia6
3Czechia7
...
33=Uzbekistan29
33=Uruguay29
35Poland30
36Serbia34
37=Israel36
37=Portugal36
39Azerbaijan38
40Chile41
41=Croatia42
41=Moldova42
43Argentina43
44Mexico45
45Kyrgyzstan47
46Kosovo48
47=Tajikistan50
47=Romania50
World Avg54.3
q=106.

Pew Forum polling over the decades has found the following adherency rates:78:

20102020
Christian95.5%91.5%
Muslim3.24%4.42%
Unaffiliated1.22%4.01%
Buddhist<0.1%<0.1%
Jewish<0.1%<0.1%
Other<0.1%<0.1%
Hindu<0.1%<0.1%

It appears that when asked "What religion are you" many give pollsters the 'correct' answer despite how they actually feel, and despite what they actually believe. Although 96% of the populace say they belong to a religion, only 34% say that they are religious when the question is phrased as "Is religion an important part of your daily life?".

For more on this phenomenon, see:

The CIA World Factbook has slightly different data, and states: Serbian Orthodox 85%, Catholic 5.5%, Protestant 1.1%, Muslim 3.2%, unspecified 2.6%, other, unknown, or atheist 2.6% (2002 census)79.

Links:

j