The Human Truth Foundation

Which are the Countries for International Contributions, Creativity, Peace and Inequality?

https://www.humantruth.info/best_culture_misc.html

By Vexen Crabtree 2025

#culture #equality #human_development #politics

This is the final pillar of the Social and Moral Development Index; it has 22 datasets, including multiple decades of data on World Giving Index, resisting corruption, overall happiness, Creativity and Culture, Open Trading, Aid and Development, its Global Peace Index rating, Peacekeeping and Security, Refugees and UN Treaties, the impact of terrorism, Inequality in Life Expectancy, Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient) and Multidimensional Poverty.


1. The Criteria: National Culture

National Culture

Constituent Data Sets: National Culture
1. World Giving IndexBest: Indonesia, Kenya, USA
Worst: Cambodia, Japan, 2-country draw

2010s: Myanmar (Burma), USA, New Zealand, China, Greece, Yemen

2. CorruptionBest: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand
Worst: Somalia, S. Sudan, Syria

2010s: Denmark, New Zealand, Finland, Somalia, N. Korea, Afghanistan

2000s: Finland, Denmark, New Zealand, Somalia, Myanmar (Burma), Bangladesh

1990s: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Nigeria, Honduras, Paraguay

3. HappinessBest: Finland, Denmark, Iceland
Worst: Afghanistan, Sierra Leone, Lebanon

2010s: Denmark, Finland, Norway, S. Sudan, Central African Rep., Burundi

4. Creativity and CultureBest: Belgium, Netherlands, Estonia
Worst: Libya, Congo, DR, Rwanda
5. Open Trading, Aid and DevelopmentBest: Ireland, Denmark, Sweden
Worst: Equatorial Guinea, Brazil, Papua New Guinea
Constituent Data Sets: Peace Versus Instability
6. Global Peace IndexBest: Iceland, Denmark, Ireland
Worst: Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria

2010s: Iceland, Denmark, Austria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia

7. Peacekeeping and SecurityBest: Samoa, S. Africa, Tunisia
Worst: Guinea-Bissau, Marshall Islands, Tonga
8. Refugees and UN TreatiesBest: Austria, Germany, Netherlands
Worst: Brunei, Tonga, Fiji
9. Impact of TerrorismBest: 13-country draw
Worst: Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria
Constituent Data Sets: Economic Inequality and Poverty
10. Inequality in Life ExpectancyInformational only
11. Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient)

2010s: Slovenia, Ukraine, Slovakia, S. Africa, Haiti, Namibia

2000s: Slovenia, Denmark, Czechia, Botswana, Namibia, S. Africa

1990s: Finland, Slovakia, Denmark, Namibia, Malawi, Lesotho

1980s: Finland, Croatia, Hungary, Brazil, Panama, Guatemala

12. Multidimensional PovertyBest: Armenia, Ukraine, Serbia
Worst: Niger, S. Sudan, Chad

1.1. World Giving Index

#charity #finland #morals #norway #politics #sweden

World Giving Index
Higher is better
1
Pos.2022
%1
2010s
Avg2
1Indonesia68.049.0
2Kenya61.046.6
3USA59.059.2
4Australia55.057.8
5New Zealand54.058.0
6Myanmar (Burma)52.060.0
7=Sierra Leone51.041.9
7=Canada51.056.1
9Zambia50.038.6
10=Ukraine49.024.4
10=Ireland49.056.8
12Czechia48.023.2
13=Nigeria48.041.9
13=Thailand48.043.2
15Guinea47.033.4
16=UK47.054.3
16=Brazil47.028.0
16=UAE47.045.1
16=Philippines47.039.2
16=Argentina47.028.1
q=125.
World Giving Index
Higher is better
1
Pos.2022
%1
2010s
Avg2
125Cambodia19.024.9
124Japan20.024.5
123=Afghanistan21.031.9
121=Belgium21.037.0
121S. Korea22.033.6
120Egypt23.023.9
119Lebanon24.031.0
118Portugal26.025.7
117Laos27.0
116Tunisia28.023.8
115=Pakistan29.029.7
113=Latvia29.023.5
111=Italy29.033.1
109=Armenia29.021.0
111Romania30.024.2
110=Algeria30.022.4
109Georgia31.020.6
108=Morocco31.026.1
106=Zimbabwe31.028.3
106Spain32.032.0
q=125.

The World Giving Index is produced annually by the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF). It produces statistical counts of individual charitable acts in three categories: the helping of strangers, donations to charity and volunteer work. The system is biased towards grassroots-charitability and because of this, it is not wise to draw moral conclusions from the data. Some countries have a top-down approach to social aid. For example, in highly socialist countries such as Finland, Norway and Sweden, the government itself is paid by citizens (through very high taxes) to engage in a lot of social work. Therefore, there is a culture in which individuals feel they already contribute to charity through a centralized and well-funded charitable social safety net: but this kind of contribution isn't reflected in the WGI. Some of those countries do score highest in measurements of how much aid is given to developing countries. Conversely, some of the lowest-ranking countries are clearly suffering from extreme poverty, and may lack the infrastructure that lets people volunteer time or give to charity.

For more, see:

World Giving Index By Global Region:

Area2022
%1
2010s
Avg2
Africa...38.230.7
Asia...37.933.7
Australasia54.557.9
Europe...39.031.7
North America44.639.5
South America42.729.7
The Middle East...36.733.5
World39.633.1

1.2. Corruption

#1990s #2000s #2010s #corruption #democracy #multinationals #organized_crime #politics

Corruption
Higher is better
3
Pos.2022
Points3
2010s
Avg
2000s
Avg
1990s
Avg
1Denmark90.0909.59.7
2=Finland87.0889.69.4
2=New Zealand87.0909.59.4
4Norway84.0858.78.9
5=Singapore83.0859.39.0
5=Sweden83.0879.29.2
7Switzerland82.0868.98.8
8Netherlands80.0838.88.9
9Germany79.0807.88.1
10=Ireland77.0737.58.2
10=Luxembourg77.0818.58.7
12Hong Kong76.0768.17.4
13Australia75.0798.78.7
14=Estonia74.0706.15.7
14=Uruguay74.0726.14.3
14=Iceland74.0789.39.3
14=Canada74.0818.79.1
18UK73.0798.48.5
19=Japan73.0747.26.4
19=Belgium73.0767.15.9
q=180.
Corruption
Higher is better
3
Pos.2022
Points3
2010s
Avg
2000s
Avg
1990s
Avg
180Somalia12.0091.4
179=Syria13.0172.9
177=S. Sudan13.013
177Venezuela14.0182.32.6
176Yemen16.0172.5
175=Burundi17.0202.2
173=Haiti17.0191.7
171=Libya17.0172.5
169=N. Korea17.012
167=Equatorial Guinea17.0181.9
170Chad19.0201.7
169=Turkmenistan19.0191.9
167=Comoros19.0262.5
165=Nicaragua19.0262.63.1
166Congo, DR20.0211.9
165=Guinea-Bissau21.0182.0
163=Congo, (Brazzaville)21.0222.1
163Eritrea22.0212.7
162=Sudan22.0141.9
161Honduras23.0292.51.8
q=180.

Corruption is the abuse of public office for private gain4. There are many forms of corruption. Politicians can sometimes (1) steal money (theft or embezzlement), (2) accept bribes (such as backhanders for awarding government contracts to companies), (3) give bribes (i.e., for electoral support or support in the mass media), (4) improperly coerce others (extortion), (5) give positions of power to friends and family without fairly seeking other applicants for those jobs (cronyism), or (6) grant favours to friends and family (nepotism) such as buying services from them at inflated prices (graft).

Corruption benefits organized crime5, multinational companies that exploit legal loopholes between countries6, and the rich and powerful7; this comes at the expense of national stability, peace and security5. The presence of corrupt politicians has been weaponized by those who seek to undermine democratic countries8. According to Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index9, the least corrupt countries in 2022 were Denmark, Finland and New Zealand3 and the worst were Somalia, S. Sudan and Syria3.

For more, see:

Corruption By Global Region:

Area2022
Points3
2010s
Avg
2000s
Avg
1990s
Avg
Africa...32.3132.32.93.6
Asia...39.9839.43.74.4
Australasia55.8356.54.59.1
Europe...57.6157.85.56.3
North America44.7047.34.24.6
South America40.0839.53.63.5
The Middle East...39.6942.04.34.7
World42.9843.04.04.9

1.3. Happiness

#happiness #human_development

Happiness
Higher is better
10
Pos.2024
Score10
2010s
Avg11
1Finland7.77.56
2Denmark7.57.62
3Iceland7.57.41
4Sweden7.37.35
5Netherlands7.37.44
6Costa Rica7.37.16
7Norway7.37.55
8Israel7.27.21
9Luxembourg7.17.00
10Mexico7.06.74
11Australia7.07.29
12New Zealand7.07.31
13Switzerland6.97.53
14Belgium6.96.94
15Ireland6.97.03
16Lithuania6.85.86
17Austria6.87.20
18Canada6.87.37
19Slovenia6.85.97
20Czechia6.86.60
q=147.
Happiness
Higher is better
10
Pos.2024
Score10
2010s
Avg11
147Afghanistan1.43.55
146Sierra Leone3.04.33
145Lebanon3.25.04
144Malawi3.33.96
143Zimbabwe3.44.02
142Botswana3.43.90
141Congo, DR3.54.33
140Yemen3.63.77
139Comoros3.83.95
138Lesotho3.84.14
137Swaziland3.84.56
136Tanzania3.83.55
135Egypt3.84.39
134Bangladesh3.94.67
133Sri Lanka3.94.34
132Ethiopia3.94.37
131Zambia3.94.55
130Madagascar4.23.90
129Liberia4.34.00
128Jordan4.35.21
q=147.

Studying happiness is difficult and people tend to overstate their own happiness - in particular those who are aware of international studies of happiness and want to portray their country in a good light. It is also especially overstated by religious folk who are institutionalized into repeating the story of 'how happy my religion makes me'12.

Currently the happiest countries are Finland, Denmark and Iceland10. The most unhappy are Afghanistan, Sierra Leone and Lebanon10. In the previous decade (the 2010s), they were Denmark, Finland and Norway11 (happiest) and S. Sudan, Central African Rep. and Burundi11 (unhappiest). The unhappiest continent is Africa, by a wide margin.

It is of course true that the happiest people are not those who are necessarily leading the best lives. Excess, indulgence and short-term policy can all lead to a high rating on this chart; things like living morally and frugally, for example, do not automatically go hand in hand with happiness even though they are virtues. But by comparing national happiness to overall development via the Social And Moral index score; we see that overall national development is strongly correlated to average happiness. In other words, the key to making a population happy in the long term is the embracing of liberal democratic values, human rights, tolerance, good education, and a strong social net (which are the factors which cause high rankings on the Social & Moral index).

For more, see:

Happiness By Global Region:

Area2024
Score10
2010s
Avg11
Africa...4.424.35
Asia...5.415.32
Australasia6.967.30
Europe...6.376.00
North America6.446.12
South America6.166.11
The Middle East...5.365.50
World5.585.39

1.4. Creativity and Culture

Creativity & Culture (2017)13
Pos.Lower is better
Rank13
1Belgium1
2Netherlands2
3Estonia3
4Switzerland4
5Sweden5
6Denmark6
7Austria7
8Ireland8
9Czechia9
10Luxembourg10
11UK11
12Portugal12
13Finland13
14France14
15Germany15
16Slovenia16
17Latvia17
18Barbados18
19Hungary19
20Slovakia20
q=163.
Creativity & Culture (2017)13
Pos.Higher is worse
Rank13
163Libya163
162Congo, DR162
161Rwanda161
160Burundi160
159Central African Rep.159
158Gabon158
157Iran157
156Iraq156
155Yemen155
154Venezuela154
153Liberia153
152Syria152
151Guinea-Bissau151
150Pakistan150
149Zambia149
148Angola148
147Equatorial Guinea147
146Nigeria146
145Laos145
144Cameroon144
q=163.

The Good Country Index Contributions to Culture data includes exports of creative goods and creative services relative to the size of the economy, UNESCO dues in arrears as percentage of contribution (negative indicator) and the number of countries and territories that citizens can freely enter without a visa.

  1. Creative goods exports: Exports of creative goods (UNCTAD's Creative Economy Report categorisation) relative to the size of the economy.

  2. Creative services exports: Exports of creative services (according to ITC's "trade in services" categories 10 and 11) relative to the size of the economy.

  3. UNESCO dues in arrears as % of contribution: UNESCO dues in arrears as percentage of contribution (negative indicator).

  4. Freedom of movement, i.e. visa restrictions: Number of countries and territories that citizens can enter without a visa (according to Henley & Partners).

  5. Press freedom: Freedom of the press (based on mean score for Reporters without Borders and Freedom House index as a negative indicator).

The last one is duplicated as press freedom is already included in SAMDI, therefore, in future editions this data will be weighted at 4/5.

Creativity and Culture By Global Region:

Creativity & Culture (2017)13
AreaLower is better
Rank13
Africa...117.8
Asia...99.0
Australasia61.1
Europe...35.0
North America69.1
South America99.7
The Middle East...107.9
World82.0

1.5. Open Trading, Aid and Development

Open Trading, Aid & Development (2017)13
Pos.Lower is better
Rank13
1Ireland1
2Denmark2
3Sweden3
4Netherlands4
5Switzerland5
6Serbia6
7Belgium7
8Norway8
9Finland9
10Croatia10
11Georgia11
12Philippines12
13Austria13
14Germany14
15Albania15
16Togo16
17France17
18Singapore18
19Malaysia19
20Nicaragua20
q=163.
Open Trading, Aid & Development (2017)13
Pos.Higher is worse
Rank13
163Equatorial Guinea163
162Brazil162
161Papua New Guinea161
160Algeria160
159Brunei159
158Mauritania158
157Bahrain157
156Venezuela156
155Grenada155
154Paraguay154
153Iraq153
152Gabon152
151Suriname151
150Cameroon150
149India149
148Iran148
147Syria147
146Jamaica146
145Samoa145
144St Vincent & Grenadines144
q=163.

The Good Country Index gauges how well countries are doing in helping international development; their index includes data on open trading across borders, and, relative to the size of the economy: number of aid workers and volunteers sent overseas according to UN, fairtrade market size, global foreign direct investment outflow and development cooperation contributions.

  1. Open trading: Trading across borders (open trading performance compared to best practice; i.e. IFC distance to frontier).

  2. UN volunteers abroad: Number of aid workers and volunteers sent overseas (according to UNV) relative to the size of the economy.

  3. Fairtrade market size: Fairtrade market size (according to Fairtrade International) relative to the size of the economy.

  4. FDI outflows: FDI outflow (according to UNCTAD) relative to the size of the economy.

  5. Development assistance: Development cooperation contributions (aid according to Development Initiatives) relative to the size of the economy.

Open Trading, Aid and Development By Global Region:

Open Trading, Aid & Development (2017)13
AreaLower is better
Rank13
Africa...96.7
Asia...86.3
Australasia91.6
Europe...42.6
North America87.5
South America123.3
The Middle East...91.3
World82.0

1.6. Global Peace Index

#2010s #human_development #peace #politics

Global Peace Index
Lower is better
14
Pos.2023
Score14
2010s
Avg15
1Iceland1.121.14
2Denmark1.311.27
3Ireland1.311.39
4New Zealand1.311.30
5Austria1.321.29
6Singapore1.331.42
7Portugal1.331.36
8Slovenia1.331.34
9Japan1.341.38
10Switzerland1.341.39
11Canada1.351.35
12Czechia1.381.37
13Finland1.401.37
14Croatia1.451.58
15Germany1.461.52
16Netherlands1.491.48
17Bhutan1.501.67
18Hungary1.511.49
19Malaysia1.511.62
20Belgium1.521.46
q=163.
Global Peace Index
Lower is better
14
Pos.2023
Score14
2010s
Avg15
163Afghanistan3.453.28
162Yemen3.352.80
161Syria3.293.03
160S. Sudan3.222.96
159Congo, DR3.212.98
158Russia3.143.01
157Ukraine3.042.54
156Somalia3.043.16
155Sudan3.023.08
154Iraq3.013.24
153Mali2.962.49
152Central African Rep.2.933.02
151Ethiopia2.872.42
150Burkina Faso2.871.88
149N. Korea2.852.94
148=Iran2.802.48
146=Turkey2.802.56
146Pakistan2.753.07
145Myanmar (Burma)2.742.25
144Nigeria2.712.66
q=163.

The Global Peace Index is produced by the Institute for Economics & Peace, and is "the world's leading study on global levels of peacefulness"; it ranks nations using over 20 "qualitative and quantitative indicators from highly respected sources, which gauge three broad themes: the level of safety and security in society; the extent of domestic or international conflict; and the degree of militarisation. [The IEP] hopes to make a valuable contribution to better understanding how civil society, researchers, policymakers, and government can create a more peaceful society"14. The most peaceable countries in the world are Iceland, Denmark and Ireland14 and the worst are Afghanistan, Yemen and Syria14.

The Dalai Lama said that he hoped the index would encourage countries to strive for peace. "Compiling and maintaining an index of which countries are the most peaceful and publishing the results will undoubtedly make the factors and qualities that contribute to that status better known and will encourage people to foster them in their own countries," he said.

The Guardian (2007)16

Despite the positive appeal of the Global Peace Index, it is imperfect and as with all international statistics, some countries appear to have a natural advantage. In this case, it is small countries which exist inside regional blocs: Denmark or Switzerland without stepping on the toes of many other countries which have sturdy militaries, so there is less incentive for those countries to invest in defence. Although note that of course defence spending is only one of the many factors considered by the GPI, it is easy to imagine that a country such as Israel (151st), surrounded by aggressive neighbours, could never score well on this index.

Global Peace Index By Global Region:

Area2023
Score14
2010s
Avg15
Africa...2.292.20
Asia...2.172.20
Australasia1.641.56
Europe...1.701.70
North America2.112.01
South America2.152.05
The Middle East...2.382.32
World2.072.03

1.7. Peacekeeping and Security

Peacekeeping & Security (2017)13
Pos.Lower is better
Rank13
1Samoa1
2S. Africa2
3Tunisia3
4Egypt4
5Nigeria5
6Uruguay6
7Indonesia7
8Brunei8
9Moldova9
10Morocco10
11Oman11
12Tanzania12
13Cameroon13
14Singapore14
15Colombia15
16Costa Rica16
17Hungary17
18Japan18
19Chile19
20Kazakhstan20
q=163.
Peacekeeping & Security (2017)13
Pos.Higher is worse
Rank13
163Guinea-Bissau163
162Marshall Islands162
161Tonga161
160Slovenia160
159Bahrain159
158Iraq158
157Yemen157
156Swaziland156
155Mali155
154Liberia154
153Lebanon153
152Afghanistan152
151Sierra Leone151
150Seychelles150
149Bosnia & Herzegovina149
148Central African Rep.148
147UAE147
146Croatia146
145Libya145
144Haiti144
q=163.

The Good Country Index gauges how well countries are doing in helping maintain international peace and security, taking into account the number of peacekeeping troops sent overseas for UN missions relative to the size of the economy, dues in arrears to UN peace keeping budgets as % of contribution (negative indicator), number of casualties of international organised violence relative to the size of the economy (negative indicator), arms and ammunition exports (negative indicator) and global cybersecurity index score.

  1. Peacekeeping troops: Number of peacekeeping troops sent overseas for UN missions, relative to the size of the economy.

  2. Dues in arrears to UN peace keeping budgets as % of contribution: Dues in arrears to financial contribution to UN peacekeeping missions as percentage of contribution (negative indicator).

  3. International violent conflict: Attributed number of casualties of international organised violence (number of casualties per conflict divided by the number of countries involved according to UCDP/PRIO) relative to the size of the economy (negative indicator).

  4. Arms exports: Exports of weapons and ammunition (according to ITC) relative to the size of the economy (negative indicator).

  5. Internet security: Global Cybersecurity Index score (according to ITU).

Peacekeeping and Security By Global Region:

Peacekeeping & Security (2017)13
AreaLower is better
Rank13
Africa...83.6
Asia...76.0
Australasia88.1
Europe...84.6
North America98.8
South America53.6
The Middle East...101.6
World82.0

1.8. Refugees and UN Treaties

Refugees & UN Treaties (2017)13
Pos.Lower is better
Rank13
1Austria1
2Germany2
3Netherlands3
4Sweden4
5Malta5
6Australia6
7Norway7
8Finland8
9Denmark9
10Switzerland10
11Canada11
12UK12
13Belgium13
14Italy14
15Spain15
16France16
17Cyprus17
18Slovenia18
19New Zealand19
20Luxembourg20
q=163.
Refugees & UN Treaties (2017)13
Pos.Higher is worse
Rank13
163Brunei163
162Tonga162
161Fiji161
160Equatorial Guinea160
159Laos159
158Vietnam158
157St Lucia157
156Ivory Coast156
155Congo, DR155
154Guyana154
153Angola153
152Grenada152
151Zimbabwe151
150Burundi150
149Marshall Islands149
148Bahamas148
147El Salvador147
146Central African Rep.146
145Chad145
144Rwanda144
q=163.

The Good Country Index gauges how well countries are doing in helping international development, taking into account percentage of population that gives to charity (according to Charities Aid Foundation), number of refugees hosted relative to the size of the economy, number of refugees overseas relative to the size of the population (negative indicator), birth rate (negative indicator) and the number of UN treaties signed (up to 2014).

  1. Charity giving: Percentage of population that gives to charity (according to Charities Aid Foundation) as proxy for cosmopolitan attitude.

  2. Refugees hosted: Number of refugees hosted (according to UNHCR) relative to the size of the economy.

  3. Refugees generated: Number of refugees overseas (according to UNHCR) relative to the size of the population (negative indicator).

  4. Birth rate: Population birth rate (according to World Bank as negative indicator).

  5. UN Treaties signed: Number of UN treaties signed (up to 2014) as proxy for diplomatic action and peaceful conflict resolution.

Note that charitable giving is already included in SAMDI via the World Giving Index and birth rates are arleady covered in SAMDI Health Policies data, therefore, in future editions this GC data series will be weighted at 3/5.

Refugees and UN Treaties By Global Region:

Refugees & UN Treaties (2017)13
AreaLower is better
Rank13
Africa...104.5
Asia...92.2
Australasia103.6
Europe...37.8
North America99.1
South America78.0
The Middle East...90.1
World82.0

1.9. Impact of Terrorism

#extremism #politics #religious_violence #terrorism

Impact of Terrorism (2019)17
Pos.Lower is better
Score17
1Togo0.00
2Mongolia0.00
3Swaziland0.00
4Equatorial Guinea0.00
5Cambodia0.00
6Portugal0.00
7Croatia0.00
8Benin0.00
9Mauritania0.00
10Slovenia0.00
11Costa Rica0.00
12Romania0.00
13El Salvador0.00
14Bhutan0.01
15=Trinidad & Tobago0.02
15=Uzbekistan0.02
17Qatar0.03
18=Iceland0.03
19Panama0.04
20=Guyana0.04
q=150.
Impact of Terrorism (2019)17
Pos.Higher is worse
Score17
150Afghanistan9.60
149Iraq9.24
148Nigeria8.60
147Syria8.01
146Pakistan7.89
145Somalia7.80
144India7.52
143Yemen7.26
142Philippines7.14
141Congo, DR7.04
140Egypt6.79
139Libya6.77
138Mali6.65
137Central African Rep.6.62
136Cameroon6.62
135Turkey6.53
134S. Sudan6.32
133Thailand6.03
132Colombia5.91
131Sudan5.81
q=150.

The Institute for Economics & Peace scores each country on a combination of a five year weighted average of total number of deaths due to terrorism and its impact18.

Impact of Terrorism By Global Region:

Impact of Terrorism (2019)17
AreaLower is better
Score17
Africa...3.41
Asia...3.60
Australasia1.38
Europe...1.62
North America1.66
South America2.76
The Middle East...4.45
World2.78

1.10. Inequality in Life Expectancy

#health #inequality #life_expectancy

Inequality in Life Expectancy (2019)19
Pos.Higher is worse19
184Chad40.90
183Central African Rep.40.10
182Sierra Leone39.00
181Somalia38.90
180Nigeria37.10
179Mali36.70
178S. Sudan36.20
177Congo, DR36.10
176Benin34.90
175Equatorial Guinea34.60
174Cameroon33.50
173Ivory Coast33.30
172Lesotho33.10
171Guinea-Bissau32.30
170Haiti32.20
169=Burkina Faso32.00
167=Angola32.00
167Guinea31.30
166Niger30.90
165Togo30.50
q=184.
Inequality in Life Expectancy (2019)19
Pos.Lower is better19
1Iceland2.40
2=Singapore2.50
2=Hong Kong2.50
4Sweden2.90
5=Slovenia2.90
5=Japan2.90
7Finland3.00
8=Czechia3.00
8=Norway3.00
8=S. Korea3.00
8=Spain3.00
12Netherlands3.10
13=Italy3.10
14Israel3.30
15=Luxembourg3.40
15=Ireland3.40
17Portugal3.50
18=Greece3.50
18=Switzerland3.50
20Belgium3.60
q=184.

Inequality in Life Expectancy By Global Region:

Inequality in Life Expectancy (2019)19
AreaLower is better19
Africa...26.10
Asia...11.80
Australasia13.47
Europe...4.86
North America11.65
South America12.66
The Middle East...9.16
World14.59

1.11. Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient)

#1980s #1990s #2000s #2010s #capitalism #economics #inequality #social_development

Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient)
Lower is better
20
Pos.2023
%20
2010s
Avg21
2000s
Avg21
1990s
Avg21
1980s
Avg21
1Slovakia24.1%2225.7%26.7%23.2%
2Slovenia24.3%2225.1%24.4%25.8%23.6%
3Belarus24.4%2326.3%28.8%31.9%
4Ukraine25.6%2325.2%28.1%33.3%
5=Moldova25.7%2227.8%35.4%39.7%
5=Netherlands25.7%2228.2%29.3%29.9%27.6%
7Iceland26.1%2426.6%29.1%
8Czechia26.2%2225.8%26.6%24.4%
9=Kyrgyzstan26.4%2528.1%32.0%
9=UAE26.4%2629.5%
11Syria26.6%2539.4%35.2%
12=Azerbaijan26.6%2728.3%34.6%
12=Belgium26.6%2227.7%29.4%26.7%25.5%
14Tonga27.1%2233.5%37.6%
15Algeria27.6%2827.6%35.3%37.4%
16=Finland27.7%2227.3%27.7%23.2%22.2%
16=Norway27.7%2926.8%28.0%25.6%24.6%
18Kiribati27.8%2927.8%37.0%
19Armenia27.9%2531.4%32.8%36.2%
20Denmark28.3%2228.0%25.4%23.8%26.2%
q=167.
Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient)
Lower is better
20
Pos.2023
%20
2010s
Avg21
2000s
Avg21
1990s
Avg21
1980s
Avg21
167S. Africa63.0%3063.2%61.8%59.3%
166Namibia59.1%3159.1%62.1%71.1%
165Belize57.7%3257.7%
164Colombia54.8%2551.9%55.5%55.6%
163Swaziland54.6%3354.6%52.3%58.6%
162Botswana53.3%3153.3%62.6%60.1%54.2%
161Brazil52.0%2553.0%56.1%58.9%59.1%
160Zambia51.5%2553.9%50.3%52.4%
159Angola51.3%2651.3%47.3%
158=Mozambique50.3%2952.1%46.2%53.3%
156=Zimbabwe50.3%2945.9%
156Congo, (Brazzaville)48.9%2848.9%47.3%
155=Panama48.9%3450.7%54.5%57.5%58.6%
154Guatemala48.3%3048.3%54.4%49.4%56.5%
153Honduras48.2%2950.4%56.3%54.4%55.2%
152Costa Rica46.7%3448.5%49.4%46.1%42.5%
151Nicaragua46.2%3046.2%48.5%55.8%
150Comoros45.3%3045.3%55.9%
149Paraguay45.1%2548.5%52.9%52.1%
148Lesotho44.9%2444.9%51.2%63.0%56.0%
q=167.

The Gini coefficient measures the imbalance amongst incomes in a country; lower scores are better. 100% is absolute and universal inequality, and 0% means that incomes are distributed equally between people20. It doesn't factor-in standing wealth (just income), so its not a comprehensive indicator of all inequality. By averaging countries' results by continent, you can see the best regions: Europe (30.8%), Asia (33.0%) and The Middle East (33.3%)20; and also the worst: South America (44.2%), North America (43.8%) and Africa (40.7%)20.

For more, see:

Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient) By Global Region:

Area2023
%20
2010s
Avg21
2000s
Avg21
1990s
Avg21
1980s
Avg21
Africa...40.7%41.7%43.4%47.4%42.3%
Asia...33.0%34.6%36.0%36.8%35.9%
Australasia34.8%35.2%39.9%39.2%32.3%
Europe...30.7%31.7%31.9%31.4%28.4%
North America43.8%45.9%49.4%47.8%46.8%
South America44.2%46.4%51.4%51.4%50.4%
The Middle East...33.4%34.3%35.9%37.5%40.3%
World36.5%37.7%39.6%40.8%38.0%

1.12. Multidimensional Poverty

#capitalism #economics #inequality #poverty #social_development

Multidimensional Poverty (2018)35
Pos.Lower is better
Severity35
1Armenia.001
2Ukraine.001
3Serbia.001
4Turkmenistan.001
5Jordan.002
6Kazakhstan.002
7Montenegro.002
8Trinidad & Tobago.002
9Maldives.003
10Albania.003
11Thailand.003
12Moldova.004
13Palestine.004
14Tunisia.005
15St Lucia.007
16Libya.007
17Algeria.008
18Kyrgyzstan.008
19Bosnia & Herzegovina.008
20Barbados.009
q=101.
Multidimensional Poverty (2018)35
Pos.Higher is worse
Severity35
101Niger.590
100S. Sudan.580
99Chad.533
98Burkina Faso.519
97Ethiopia.489
96Central African Rep..465
95Mali.457
94Madagascar.453
93Mozambique.411
92Burundi.403
91Congo, DR.389
90Guinea-Bissau.372
89Benin.368
88Guinea.336
87Liberia.320
86Sierra Leone.297
85Nigeria.291
84Senegal.288
83Gambia.286
82Angola.282
q=101.

The Multidimensional Poverty Index is the United Nation's presentation of data on a wide range of factors, in additional to basic income it also includes access to clean water, nutrition and housing. The index is a count of the percentage of the population that are deprived across multiple fields, adjusted by the intensity of the poverty35. The countries at the bottom of this index are Armenia (.001), Ukraine (.001) and Serbia (.001)35; portions of their populations are truly living horrifically impoverished lives.

For more, see:

Multidimensional Poverty By Global Region:

Multidimensional Poverty (2018)35
AreaLower is better
Severity35
Africa....264
Asia....084
Australasia.174
Europe....004
North America.052
South America.034
The Middle East....054
World.154

2. Overall Results by Country

#charitability #culture #human_development #peace

The overall scores are simply an average of each countries' position in all of the data sets that make up this category. Countries only receive a ranking if they have at least 6 different data points across the data sets. The overall results for each country are listed alongside their position in the Social and Moral Development Index.

Pos.Culture, Peace & Inequality (2020)
Lower is better

Avg Rank36
Social & Moral
Lower is better

Avg Rank37
1Denmark11.227.2
2Norway13.931.1
3Netherlands14.433.5
4New Zealand15.536.6
5Finland16.134.6
6Sweden19.633.2
7Singapore20.262.6
8Austria20.737.6
9Switzerland21.233.7
10Iceland22.337.4
11Ireland22.836.8
12Canada23.142.2
13Germany24.439.0
14Luxembourg25.742.4
15Australia29.438.6
16Belgium31.340.5
17UK31.838.7
18Slovenia32.646.0
19Malta36.854.6
20Taiwan37.250.3
21Czechia38.952.0
22Hong Kong40.5
23Hungary41.156.4
24UAE41.184.6
25France41.340.5
26Poland41.557.1
27Estonia44.251.9
28Qatar44.886.1
29Spain45.045.0
30Japan45.543.0
31Barbados46.966.2
32Costa Rica47.355.8
33Cyprus47.456.5
34Portugal48.248.7
35Mauritius48.364.9
36Italy48.645.0
37Slovakia48.860.3
38Bhutan49.296.3
39S. Korea49.553.8
40Uruguay52.654.5
41Croatia52.961.1
42USA54.154.9
43Romania54.466.1
44Malaysia55.476.0
45Chile57.459.4
46Lithuania59.660.6
47Moldova59.777.9
48Latvia60.160.1
49Kosovo60.981.0
50Serbia61.171.0
q=180.
Pos.Culture, Peace & Inequality (2020)
Lower is better

Avg Rank36
Social & Moral
Lower is better

Avg Rank37
51Oman61.899.9
52Mongolia62.189.2
53Trinidad & Tobago62.177.4
54Bulgaria62.569.1
55Jordan65.492.4
56Indonesia65.985.7
57Albania66.073.9
58Kuwait66.386.5
59Thailand67.377.6
60Sao Tome & Principe67.7110.2
61Israel68.666.8
62Bosnia & Herzegovina68.977.3
63Jamaica69.580.1
64Greece70.958.6
65Timor-Leste (E. Timor)71.5105.4
66Montenegro73.272.4
67Argentina73.670.0
68Cuba73.890.8
69Tunisia74.977.1
70Maldives75.189.7
71Macedonia75.275.8
72Ghana75.496.4
73Kazakhstan75.890.3
74Vietnam76.684.5
75Seychelles76.783.3
76Philippines76.883.7
77Morocco77.086.1
78Fiji77.483.7
79Belarus77.784.5
80Panama78.486.1
81Belize78.891.8
82Dominica79.679.1
83Bahamas79.780.0
84Sri Lanka79.870.6
85Senegal79.9103.8
86China80.685.1
87Kyrgyzstan81.792.9
88Armenia82.282.1
89Bahrain82.391.8
90Uzbekistan82.999.3
91Samoa83.3109.9
92Botswana83.398.3
93Nepal83.492.6
94Brazil83.574.7
95Guatemala84.297.0
96St Lucia84.286.9
97Ukraine84.479.8
98S. Africa84.887.8
99Dominican Rep.84.986.7
100Guyana84.9100.0
q=180.
Pos.Culture, Peace & Inequality (2020)
Lower is better

Avg Rank36
Social & Moral
Lower is better

Avg Rank37
101Suriname85.496.3
102El Salvador85.589.6
103India85.686.0
104Algeria86.297.4
105Turkey86.877.1
106Georgia87.178.0
107Mexico87.281.3
108Namibia87.3103.2
109Peru87.380.0
110Ecuador88.180.9
111Saudi Arabia88.4103.7
112Zambia88.5113.8
113Tajikistan88.6107.3
114Bolivia88.891.9
115St Vincent & Grenadines89.283.4
116Cape Verde90.888.0
117Malawi91.3115.2
118Nicaragua92.1100.7
119Ethiopia92.2117.4
120Colombia92.683.2
121Grenada93.079.7
122Burkina Faso93.2111.1
123Tanzania93.3112.9
124Sierra Leone93.4116.1
125Egypt93.6100.0
126Laos95.5118.9
127Mauritania95.5126.6
128Paraguay95.599.5
129Liberia95.9122.5
130Bangladesh95.9100.2
131Honduras96.1104.4
132Lesotho96.4105.9
133Turkmenistan96.7118.5
134Togo97.0116.5
135Kenya97.8105.6
136Uganda97.9111.4
137Pakistan99.2113.7
138Azerbaijan99.593.3
139Palestine99.9
140Gabon100.3114.0
141Rwanda100.8110.7
142Benin100.8115.7
143Nigeria101.0117.1
144Ivory Coast101.3119.8
145Madagascar101.7113.5
146Russia103.290.0
147Swaziland103.2119.3
148=Iran103.4101.9
148=Guinea103.4123.4
150Djibouti103.6120.8
q=180.
Pos.Culture, Peace & Inequality (2020)
Lower is better

Avg Rank36
Social & Moral
Lower is better

Avg Rank37
151Gambia104.9117.7
152Tonga105.399.0
153Lebanon105.492.9
154Myanmar (Burma)105.7114.6
155Niger106.1125.0
156Cameroon109.9119.4
157Mozambique110.1122.7
158Papua New Guinea110.3122.5
159Cambodia110.5112.0
160Zimbabwe110.9128.2
161Venezuela113.1101.0
162Mali115.6117.3
163Congo, (Brazzaville)115.7122.6
164Libya115.8112.9
165Iraq116.6124.8
166Guinea-Bissau119.3122.4
167Haiti120.8117.7
168Angola122.2135.8
169Sudan122.7139.0
170Equatorial Guinea123.0138.8
171Burundi123.1122.0
172Syria124.9122.4
173Yemen130.3127.4
174Comoros130.7123.3
175Chad132.1136.6
176Congo, DR133.7133.5
177Central African Rep.137.1131.1
178S. Sudan137.8149.8
179Afghanistan140.3136.4
180Somalia152.9166.1
q=180.

3. Overall Results by Region

#capitalism #charitability #charity #corruption #culture #economics #extremism #happiness #health #human_development #inequality #life_expectancy #morals #peace #politics #poverty #religious_violence #social_development #terrorism

AreaCulture, Peace & Inequality (2020)
Lower is better

Avg Rank36
Social & Moral
Lower is better

Avg Rank37
Africa...101.84119.0
Asia...79.5992.0
Australasia70.2195.6
Baltic States54.6255.7
Central America80.3491.7
Europe...48.4855.7
Melanesia93.88108.7
North America76.6882.7
Polynesia68.0387.3
Scandinavia...21.2231.5
Small Islands...74.4289.4
South America83.5783.9
The Americas...79.1981.5
The Balkans67.3370.7
The Caribbean...80.3383.9
The Mediterranean72.2271.0
The Middle East...83.9394.1
World78.1289.3

The table here shows overall results for this category, compared with each region's average score on the Social and Moral Development Index. Regional values are calculated as an average of national results, not by total regional population. The tables below show results for each data set for each region.

National Culture Data Sets by Region:

AreaWorld Giving Index (2022)
Higher is better

%1
Corruption (2022)
Higher is better

Points3
Happiness (2024)
Higher is better

Score10
Creativity & Culture (2017)
Lower is better

Rank13
Open Trading, Aid & Development (2017)
Lower is better

Rank13
Africa...38.232.314.42117.896.7
Asia...37.939.985.4199.086.3
Australasia54.555.836.9661.191.6
Baltic States35.365.006.4814.380.3
Central America40.431.506.5183.973.0
Europe...39.057.616.3735.042.6
North America44.644.706.4469.187.5
Polynesia54.087.006.9555.097.7
Scandinavia...42.782.007.3014.327.3
Small Islands...42.050.125.8764.088.4
South America42.740.086.1699.7123.3
The Americas...43.742.976.3180.2100.5
The Balkans39.940.885.9454.642.9
The Caribbean...45.048.275.8764.4102.6
The Mediterranean33.942.905.6270.562.8
The Middle East...36.739.695.36107.991.3
World39.642.985.5882.082.0

Peace Versus Instability Data Sets by Region:

AreaGlobal Peace Index (2023)
Lower is better

Score14
Peacekeeping & Security (2017)
Lower is better

Rank13
Refugees & UN Treaties (2017)
Lower is better

Rank13
Impact of Terrorism (2019)
Lower is better

Score17
Africa...2.2983.6104.53.41
Asia...2.1776.092.23.60
Australasia1.6488.1103.61.38
Baltic States1.6198.766.00.27
Central America2.1187.184.10.89
Europe...1.7084.637.81.62
Melanesia2.10103.0129.51.36
North America2.1198.899.11.66
Polynesia1.3165.0103.70.14
Scandinavia...1.4367.323.71.11
Small Islands...1.87101.5106.31.07
South America2.1553.678.02.76
The Americas...2.1382.391.52.16
The Balkans1.82108.644.61.25
The Caribbean...2.09115.1123.10.71
The Mediterranean2.1191.259.93.48
The Middle East...2.38101.690.14.45
World2.0782.082.02.78

Economic Inequality and Poverty Data Sets by Region:

AreaInequality in Life Expectancy (2019)
Lower is better19
Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient) (2023)
Lower is better

%20
Multidimensional Poverty (2018)
Lower is better

Severity35
Africa...26.1040.7%.264
Asia...11.8033.0%.084
Australasia13.4734.8%.174
Baltic States4.8334.3%
Central America11.9647.8%.069
Europe...4.8630.7%.004
Melanesia16.3835.5%.174
Micronesia20.4034.0%
North America11.6543.8%.052
Polynesia8.2335.0%
Scandinavia...3.0828.6%
Small Islands...12.6435.8%.083
South America12.6644.2%.034
The Americas...12.0344.0%.045
The Balkans5.5133.0%.005
The Caribbean...12.7841.2%.042
The Mediterranean6.9832.6%.017
The Middle East...9.1633.4%.054
World14.5936.5%.154

4. The Social and Moral Development Index

The data sets form part of the calculations for the Human Truth Foundation's Social and Moral Development Index.

The Social and Moral Development Index concentrates on moral issues and human rights, violence, public health, equality, tolerance, freedom and effectiveness in climate change mitigation and environmentalism, and on some technological issues. A country scores higher for achieving well in those areas, and for sustaining that achievement in the long term. Those countries towards the top of this index can truly said to be setting good examples and leading humankind onwards into a bright, humane, and free future. See: Which are the Best Countries in the World? The Social and Moral Development Index.

5. Compare with the UN's Human Development Index

#canada #human_development #iceland #norway

UN HDI (2021)38
Pos.Higher is better
Value38
21USA0.921
22Israel0.919
23=Slovenia0.918
23=Malta0.918
25Austria0.916
26UAE0.911
27Spain0.905
28France0.903
29Cyprus0.896
30Italy0.895
31Estonia0.890
32Czechia0.889
33Greece0.887
34Poland0.876
35=Saudi Arabia0.875
35=Bahrain0.875
35=Lithuania0.875
38Portugal0.866
39Latvia0.863
40=Andorra0.858
q=191.
UN HDI (2021)38
Pos.Higher is better
Value38
1Switzerland0.962
2Norway0.961
3Iceland0.959
4Hong Kong0.952
5Australia0.951
6Denmark0.948
7Sweden0.947
8Ireland0.945
9Germany0.942
10Netherlands0.941
11Finland0.940
12Singapore0.939
13=Belgium0.937
13=New Zealand0.937
15Canada0.936
16Liechtenstein0.935
17Luxembourg0.930
18UK0.929
19=S. Korea0.925
19=Japan0.925
q=191.

The United Nations produces an annual Human Development Report which includes the Human Development Index. The factors taken into account include life expectancy, education and schooling and Gross National Income (GNI) amongst many others.

Norway has been the top of this list since ousting Canada in 2001 (except in 2007 and 2008 when Iceland made it to the top).

This data series is only here for informational reasons, meaning, it does not form part of the Social and Moral Development Index formula. This is because the UN HDI takes into account many factors (such as wealth) that are not social or moral in nature, and, the bulk of the social-and-moral-development data is already included in SAMDI.

Links: