https://www.humantruth.info/scandinavia.html
By Vexen Crabtree 2025
#denmark #estonia #finland #human_development #iceland #norway #politics #polytheism #scandinavia #sweden
Social & Moral Development Index1 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank1 | |
1 | Denmark | 29.7 |
2 | Norway | 33.6 |
3 | Sweden | 36.0 |
4 | Finland | 38.5 |
5 | Iceland | 43.9 |
6 | Estonia | 58.1 |
Scandinavia Avg | 31.5 | |
World Avg | 88.9 | |
q=6. |
Scandinavian countries have become the most highly developed nations, culturally superior to the rest of the world, the true crowns of human civilisation. They epitomize Europe's society-first democracy and capitalism. They lead the world in many endeavours of Human development, science and social development. This page is witness to much of that success. But no human endeavour is without downfalls, Scandinavia has some crime, some very expensive living costs and (oddly) the occasional high suicide rate.
There are 8 locations that fall within this category. By adding up all the known populations that fall within these locations, and summing their physical land areas, we can calculate population densities. Some islands and territories can end up being counted twice depending on how they are classified and divided up politically, but, mostly such errors involve only small populations. So, some data on this collection of countries in total:
#economics #human_development #population #wealth
Pos. | Population (2018) Population2 | Social & Moral Lower is better Avg Rank1 | Gross National Income (2021) Higher is better PPP $3 | UN HDI (2021) Higher is better Value3 | Land Area (2011) km24 | People Per km2 Lower is better | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 5.8m | 29.7 | $60 365 | 0.948 | 42 430 | 136 |
2 | Finland | 5.5m | 38.5 | $49 452 | 0.940 | 303 890 | 18 |
3 | Iceland | 0.3m | 43.9 | $55 782 | 0.959 | 100 250 | 3 |
4 | Norway | 5.3m | 33.6 | $64 660 | 0.961 | 304 250 | 18 |
5 | Sweden | 10.0m | 36.0 | $54 489 | 0.947 | 410 340 | 24 |
6 | Faroe Islands | 1 396 | |||||
7 | Estonia | 1.3m | 58.1 | $38 048 | 0.890 | 42 390 | 31 |
Scandinavia Avg | 4.7m | 31.5 | $53 799 | 0.94 | 172 135 | 27 | |
World Avg | 39.0m | 88.9 | $20 136 | 0.72 | 620 450 | 63 | |
q=7. No data: 15 |
Not showing due to lack of data: the Faroe Islands.
This page only shows places where the database has enough data to be able to come to reasonable conclusions about each place. The main focus is on nation states, but, some distinct external territories may be listed if the database has enough information about them. Averages are calculated from as many valid data points as possible, meaning, that some territories and locations that are not listed above may still be used to calculate some of the average values. Some calculations only use Independent State data - hover the cursor over values to see hints.
Links:
#charitability #climate_change #culture #education #equality #freedom #gender_equality #health #human_development #human_rights #modernity #morals #peace #politics #prejudice #technology #the_environment #the_internet #tolerance
Here are each country's overall scores across the categories that make up the Social and Moral Development Index. This is followed by lists of how each country scores in each individual data set.
Pos. | Social & Moral Lower is better Avg Rank1 | Responsibility Towards The Environment (2025) Lower is better Avg Rank6 | Culture, Peace & Inequality (2020) Lower is better Avg Rank7 | Modernity & Learning (2020) Lower is better Avg Rank8 | Health (2025) Lower is better Avg Rank9 | Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025) Lower is better Avg Rank10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 29.7 | 50.4 | 11.2 | 13.6 | 53.0 | 8.6 |
2 | Norway | 33.6 | 66.9 | 13.9 | 18.3 | 51.6 | 9.0 |
3 | Sweden | 36.0 | 71.8 | 19.6 | 15.8 | 57.0 | 6.1 |
4 | Finland | 38.5 | 71.9 | 16.1 | 7.1 | 63.5 | 17.4 |
5 | Iceland | 43.9 | 96.9 | 22.3 | 15.0 | 53.8 | 12.9 |
6 | Estonia | 58.1 | 97.0 | 44.2 | 17.9 | 84.8 | 36.9 |
Scandinavia Avg | 31.5 | 88.17 | 21.22 | 14.63 | 76.94 | 15.20 | |
World Avg | 88.9 | 84.93 | 78.12 | 86.31 | 96.49 | 86.55 | |
q=6. |
The Social and Moral Development Index concentrates on moral issues and human rights, violence, public health, equality, tolerance, freedom and effectiveness in climate change mitigation and environmentalism, and on some technological issues. A country scores higher for achieving well in those areas, and for sustaining that achievement in the long term. Those countries towards the top of this index can truly said to be setting good examples and leading humankind onwards into a bright, humane, and free future. See: Which are the Best Countries in the World? The Social and Moral Development Index.
For more, see:
“The Nordic region [...] has the world's highest taxes and most generous welfare benefits. And yet Sweden, Finland and Denmark (Norway's oil sets it apart) have delivered strong growth and low unemployment, and rank among the world's most competitive economies. Nordic companies are strong in technology and research and development. Their health-care and educational systems are much admired. And, unlike other European countries, most Nordic states run healthy budget and current-account surpluses. Sweden, whose 9m people make it by some way the biggest Nordic country, is a particular favourite. A year ago the Guardian, a British newspaper, said it was the most successful society the world had ever known.”
The Economist (2006)11
Many European governments have looked to Scandinavia for models and inspiration; delegations have gone to study their education systems, government organisation, social methods and economic policies.
“The truth is that there is never a single economic model for other countries, even the Nordic states, to follow. Neither membership of the EU nor adoption of the euro seems necessary: Sweden is in the EU but not the euro, Finland is in both, Norway is in neither. Different countries have different strengths. Mr Bildt puts forward his own tongue-in-cheek recipe for the perfect "Nordic model", stretching the geography: Finland's education, Estonia's progressive tax policy, Denmark's labour market, Iceland's entrepreneurship, Sweden's management of big companies and Norway's oil. The right conclusion, in other words, is that it is wisest not to look for a single-country model at all, but just to take best practice wherever you find it.”
The Economist (2006)11
#birth_control #demographics #health #immigration #life_expectancy #longevity #migration #overpopulation #population
Population:
Pos. | Population (2018) Population2 | Life Expectancy (2021) Higher is better Years3 | Fertility Rate (2022) 2.0 is best12 | Old-Age Dependency Ratio (2016) Lower is better Per 10013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 5.8m | 81.4 | 1.55 | 37.1 |
2 | Finland | 5.5m | 82.0 | 1.32 | 43.3 |
3 | Iceland | 0.3m | 82.7 | 1.59 | 32.5 |
4 | Norway | 5.3m | 83.2 | 1.41 | 32.2 |
5 | Sweden | 10.0m | 83.0 | 1.52 | 37.0 |
6 | Faroe Islands | 2.05 | |||
7 | Estonia | 1.3m | 77.1 | 1.41 | 37.9 |
Scandinavia Avg | 4.7m | 81.58 | 1.55 | 36.7 | |
World Avg | 39.0m | 71.28 | 2.47 | 18.3 | |
q=7. No data: 15 |
Migration:
Pos. | Immigrants (2017) %14 | Emigrants (2010) %15 | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 11.5% | 4.7% |
2 | Finland | 6.2% | 6.2% |
3 | Iceland | 12.5% | 13.0% |
4 | Norway | 15.1% | 3.8% |
5 | Sweden | 17.6% | 3.4% |
6 | Estonia | 14.7% | 12.6% |
Scandinavia Avg | 12.9% | 7.3% | |
World Avg | 9.4% | 11.5% | |
q=6. No data: 216 |
#biodiversity #climate_change #deforestation #energy #environmentalism #food #internationalism #meat #over-exploitation #sustainability #the_environment #veganism #vegetarianism
We have known for a long term that we must protect the environment from habitation destruction, over-exploitation, pollution, and the emissions that cause climate change. In 1998, Greenpeace wrote that "Environment can no longer be meaningfully separated from health, quality of life, democracy, education, economy or trade"17. What countries have been doing the right thing, via legislation and national culture? All countries' current and historical approach towards the environment is gauged via 21 datasets, including multiple decades of data on its forested percent change 2000-2020, its environmental performance, energy to GDP efficiency, its sign-up rate to major international accords on protecting the environment, the rate of rational beliefs on the environment in the population, reducing annual meat consumption per person and its score on the Green Future Index.
The countries that do the best (Sri Lanka, Uruguay and Switzerland) tend to have avoided the excesses of early industrial countries, and have not yet repeated the same mistakes of environmental destruction - at least, not on the same scale. The regions with the best average results per country are Central America, South America and Scandinavia. The worst are Eritrea, The Vatican City and Timor-Leste (E. Timor), and the worst regions Micronesia, Australasia and Melanesia.
For more, see:
Pos. | Forest Area Change 2000-2020 Higher is better18 | Environmental Performance (2018) Higher is better19 | Energy to GDP Efficiency (2022) Lower is better Avg20 | International Accords on the Environment Higher is better Avg Rate | Rational Beliefs on the Environment (2011) Higher is better %21 | Meat Consumption (2021) Lower is better kg22 | Green Future Index (2023) Higher is better Score23 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 9.8% | 81.6 | 0.65 | 73% | 14.9% | 70.5 | 6.3 |
2 | Finland | -0.2% | 78.6 | 1.44 | 79% | 22.9% | 74.0 | 6.7 |
3 | Iceland | 64.7% | 78.6 | 4.01 | 53% | 13.1% | 83.6 | 6.7 |
4 | Norway | 0.6% | 77.5 | 1.19 | 81% | 20.5% | 74.7 | 6.4 |
5 | Sweden | -0.7% | 80.5 | 1.30 | 83% | 24.3% | 66.9 | 6.3 |
6 | Faroe Islands | 0.0% | ||||||
7 | Svalbard | 0.0% | ||||||
8 | Estonia | 8.7% | 64.3 | 1.56 | 80% | 15.9% | 72.1 | |
Scandinavia Avg | 10.4% | 76.9 | 1.69 | 74.9% | 18.6% | 73.6 | 6.5 | |
World Avg | -0.1% | 56.4 | 1.23 | 57.5% | 39.9% | 52.5 | 4.8 | |
q=8. |
#capitalism #charity #corruption #culture #economics #equality #extremism #happiness #health #human_development #inequality #life_expectancy #morals #peace #politics #poverty #religious_violence #social_development #terrorism
This is the final pillar of the Social and Moral Development Index; it has 22 datasets, including multiple decades of data on World Giving Index, resisting corruption, overall happiness, Creativity and Culture, Open Trading, Aid and Development, its Global Peace Index rating, Peacekeeping and Security, Refugees and UN Treaties, the impact of terrorism, Inequality in Life Expectancy, Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient) and Multidimensional Poverty.
For more, see:
National Culture:
Pos. | World Giving Index (2022) Higher is better %24 | Corruption (2022) Higher is better Points25 | Happiness (2024) Higher is better Score26 | Creativity & Culture (2017) Lower is better Rank27 | Open Trading, Aid & Development (2017) Lower is better Rank27 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 46.0 | 90.0 | 7.5 | 6 | 2 |
2 | Finland | 37.0 | 87.0 | 7.7 | 13 | 9 |
3 | Iceland | 46.0 | 74.0 | 7.5 | 37 | 105 |
4 | Norway | 45.0 | 84.0 | 7.3 | 22 | 8 |
5 | Sweden | 42.0 | 83.0 | 7.3 | 5 | 3 |
6 | Estonia | 40.0 | 74.0 | 6.4 | 3 | 37 |
Scandinavia Avg | 42.7 | 82.00 | 7.30 | 14.3 | 27.3 | |
World Avg | 39.6 | 42.98 | 5.58 | 82.0 | 82.0 | |
q=6. No data: 216 |
Peace Versus Instability:
Pos. | Global Peace Index (2023) Lower is better Score28 | Peacekeeping & Security (2017) Lower is better Rank27 | Refugees & UN Treaties (2017) Lower is better Rank27 | Impact of Terrorism (2019) Lower is better Score29 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 1.31 | 64 | 9 | 0.96 |
2 | Finland | 1.40 | 52 | 8 | 2.03 |
3 | Iceland | 1.12 | 77 | 42 | 0.03 |
4 | Norway | 1.55 | 51 | 7 | 0.08 |
5 | Sweden | 1.63 | 67 | 4 | 3.45 |
6 | Estonia | 1.56 | 93 | 72 | 0.12 |
Scandinavia Avg | 1.43 | 67.3 | 23.7 | 1.11 | |
World Avg | 2.07 | 82.0 | 82.0 | 2.78 | |
q=6. No data: 216 |
Economic Inequality and Poverty:
Pos. | Inequality in Life Expectancy (2019) Lower is better30 | Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient) (2023) Lower is better %31 | Multidimensional Poverty (2018) Lower is better Severity32 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 3.60 | 28.3%33 | |
2 | Finland | 3.00 | 27.7%33 | |
3 | Iceland | 2.40 | 26.1%34 | |
4 | Norway | 3.00 | 27.7%35 | |
5 | Sweden | 2.90 | 29.8%33 | |
6 | Estonia | 3.60 | 31.8%33 | |
Scandinavia Avg | 3.08 | 28.6% | ||
World Avg | 14.59 | 36.5% | .154 | |
q=6. No data: 216 |
#education #english #intelligence #it_security #maths #modernity #politics #religion #religiosity #research #science #secularisation #technology #the_internet
The most modern countries, with the best results from education, the highest levels of research, and with the easiest access to information on the Internet, are Finland, Belgium and Denmark36. The worst countries are Eritrea, S. Sudan and Sierra Leone36. Despite improves in global education, access to tertiary (adult) education is becoming increasingly unequal between the rich haves and the poor have-nots37.
“Education, at all levels and ages, is the single most vital support for equality as well as being a country's most vital economic and social resource. [...] Every successful aspirant to modernisation and economic development, from Japan to South Korea, China to Chile, has got there with a big emphasis on education.”
Bill Emmott (2017)38
15 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on Research and Development, Secondary Education, Length of Schooling, Intellectual Endeavours, Maths, Science & Reading, Religiosity, IQ, the percent of citizens with access to the internet, Freedom On The Internet, IT Security, IPv6 Uptake and digital quality of life. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe36, whereas the worst are Melanesia, Africa and Micronesia36.
For more, see:
Modernity and Education:
Pos. | Research & Development (2016) Higher is better % RDP PPP | Secondary Education (2018) Higher is better39 | Length of Schooling (2021) Higher is better Years40 | Intellectual Endeavours (2017) Lower is better Rank27 | Maths, Science & Reading (2015) Higher is better Score41 | Religiosity (2018) Lower is better %42 | IQ (2006) Higher is better43 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 3.0544 | 89.3% | 18.7 | 4 | 1513 | 9 | 98 |
2 | Finland | 3.1744 | 100.0% | 19.1 | 7 | 1568 | 10 | 99 |
3 | Iceland | 1.8944 | 100.0% | 19.2 | 15 | 1443 | 101 | |
4 | Norway | 1.7044 | 95.4% | 18.2 | 49 | 1513 | 19 | 100 |
5 | Sweden | 3.1644 | 88.9% | 19.4 | 17 | 1487 | 10 | 99 |
6 | Estonia | 1.4344 | 100.0% | 15.9 | 36 | 1573 | 6 | 99 |
Scandinavia Avg | 2.40 | 95.6% | 18.4 | 21.3 | 1516 | 10.8 | 99.3 | |
World Avg | 0.84 | 63.0% | 13.5 | 82.0 | 1389 | 54.3 | 85.6 | |
q=6. No data: 216 |
Technology and Information:
Pos. | Internet Users (2016) Higher is better45 | Internet Freedom (2012) Lower is better46 | IT Security (2013) Lower is better47 | IPv6 Uptake (2017) Higher is better Ratio48 | Digital Quality of Life (2024) Higher is better49 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 96% | 3.1 | 72.3% | ||
2 | Finland | 93% | 14.1 | 76.9% | ||
3 | Iceland | 100% | 0.3 | |||
4 | Norway | 98% | 14.7 | 64.5% | ||
5 | Sweden | 93% | 0.44 | 3.8 | 68.7% | |
6 | Faroe Islands | 99% | 1.4 | |||
7 | Estonia | 91% | 10 | 17.6 | 69.3% | |
Scandinavia Avg | 95.7% | 10.0 | 0.44 | 7.87 | 70.3% | |
World Avg | 48.1% | 46.7 | 0.98 | 3.82 | 48.4% | |
q=7. No data: 15 |
#alcohol #birth_control #demographics #health #life_expectancy #longevity #mental_health #obesity #overpopulation #parenting #population #smoking #suicide #vaccines
The countries with the best overall approach to public health, in terms of both public policy and individual lifestyle choices, are Monaco, Liechtenstein and The Isle of Man50. These countries are worth emulating. And, although often through no fault of the average citizen, the worst countries are The Marshall Islands, The Cook Islands and S. Sudan50.
27 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on its average life expectancy, its alcohol consumption rate, its fertility rate, its smoking rate, its suicide rate, its food aid and health contributions and WHO compliance, the prevalence of overweight adults, obesity rate, its adolescent birth rate and its immunizations take-up. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Europe and The Mediterranean50, whereas the worst are Micronesia, Melanesia and Australasia50.
For more, see:
Health:
Pos. | Life Expectancy (2021) Higher is better Years3 | Alcohol Consumption (2016) Lower is better Per Capita51 | Fertility Rate (2022) 2.0 is best12 | Smoking in the 2020s Lower is better %52 | Suicide Rate (2013) Per 100k53 | Food Aid, Health Contributions & WHO Compliance (2017) Lower is better Rank27 | Overweight Adults (1976) Lower is better %54 | Adult Obesity (2022) Lower is better %55 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 81.4 | 10.4 | 1.55 | 16.2% | 23.9 | 3 | 36.7 | 14.3% |
2 | Finland | 82.0 | 10.7 | 1.32 | 22.3% | 39 | 12 | 35.7 | 23.7% |
3 | Iceland | 82.7 | 9.1 | 1.59 | 9.3% | 23.5 | 41 | 40.6 | 22.6% |
4 | Norway | 83.2 | 7.5 | 1.41 | 14.3% | 23.8 | 5 | 36.5 | 19.8% |
5 | Sweden | 83.0 | 9.2 | 1.52 | 22.7% | 25.5 | 1 | 38.1 | 16.4% |
6 | Faroe Islands | 2.05 | |||||||
7 | Estonia | 77.1 | 11.6 | 1.41 | 28.3% | 37.9 | 27 | 43.9 | 26.7% |
Scandinavia Avg | 81.58 | 9.8 | 1.55 | 18.8% | 28.93 | 14.8 | 38.6 | 20.6% | |
World Avg | 71.28 | 6.2 | 2.47 | 20.0% | 20.93 | 82.0 | 27.1 | 24.7% | |
q=7. No data: 15 |
Children's Health:
Pos. | Adolescent Birth Rate (2022) Lower is better Per 100056 | Infant Immunizations 2011-2015 (2015) Higher is better Avg %57 | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 1.8 | 92.3 |
2 | Finland | 4.1 | 98.1 |
3 | Iceland | 5.1 | 91.5 |
4 | Norway | 2.2 | 94.3 |
5 | Sweden | 3.3 | 77.8 |
6 | Estonia | 8.1 | 93.9 |
Scandinavia Avg | 4.1 | 91.3 | |
World Avg | 43.8 | 88.3 | |
q=6. No data: 216 |
#antisemitism #equality #freedom #freethought #gender #gender_equality #homosexuality #human_rights #international_law #mass_media #misogyny #politics #prejudice #religious_tolerance #slavery #tolerance #women
The best countries in the world at ensuring human rights, fostering equality and promoting tolerance, are Sweden, Denmark and Norway58. These countries are displaying the best traits that humanity has to offer. The worst countries are Somalia, N. Korea and Afghanistan58.
21 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on supporting press freedom, eliminating modern slavery, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms, its average Freedom in the World rating, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports, its nominal commitment to Human Rights, speed of uptake of HR treaties, opposing gender inequality, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators), the year from which women could participate in democracy, its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, LGBT equality and freethought. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe58, whereas the worst are Africa, The Middle East and Asia58.
For more, see:
Human Rights & Tolerance:
Pos. | Press Freedom (2025) Higher is better59 | Slavery (2018) Lower is better % Victims60 | Personal, Civil & Economic Freedom (2014) Lower is better Rank61 | Freedom in the World (2024) Lower is better Score | HRW (2017) Higher is better Score62 | Nominal Commitment to HR (2009) Higher is better Treaties63 | HR Treaties Lag (2019) Lower is better Avg Yrs/Treaty64 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 86.93 | 0.16 | 5 | 1.0 | 5 | 22 | 5.06 |
2 | Finland | 87.18 | 0.17 | 9 | 1.0 | 6 | 19 | 7.49 |
3 | Iceland | 81.36 | 0.21 | 25 | 1.0 | 20 | 7.57 | |
4 | Norway | 92.31 | 0.18 | 13 | 1.0 | 1 | 20 | 5.05 |
5 | Sweden | 88.13 | 0.16 | 15 | 1.0 | 7 | 23 | 4.88 |
6 | Estonia | 89.46 | 0.36 | 21 | 1.0 | 5 | 17 | 12.06 |
Scandinavia Avg | 87.56 | 0.21 | 14.7 | 1.0 | 4.8 | 20.2 | 7.02 | |
World Avg | 54.65 | 0.65 | 79.7 | 3.7 | -1.9 | 15.1 | 10.02 | |
q=6. No data: 216 |
Gender Equality:
Pos. | Gender Inequality (2022) Lower is better65 | Gender Biases (2022) Lower is better %66 | Year Women Can Vote Lower is better Year | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 0.01 | 1915 | |
2 | Finland | 0.03 | 52.567 | 1906 |
3 | Iceland | 0.04 | 1915 | |
4 | Norway | 0.01 | 42.167 | 1913 |
5 | Sweden | 0.02 | 31.868 | 1921 |
6 | Estonia | 0.10 | 78.368 | 1918 |
Scandinavia Avg | 0.04 | 51.16 | 1915 | |
World Avg | 0.34 | 83.93 | 1930 | |
q=6. No data: 216 |
Prejudice:
Pos. | Anti-Semite Opinions (2014) Lower is better %69 | LGBT Equality (2017) Higher is better Score70 | Freedom of Thought (2021) Lower is better71 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 9 | 72 | 2.8 |
2 | Finland | 15 | 57 | 3.0 |
3 | Iceland | 16 | 72 | 1.5 |
4 | Norway | 15 | 72 | 1.5 |
5 | Sweden | 4 | 86 | 1.5 |
6 | Estonia | 22 | 45 | 2.8 |
Scandinavia Avg | 13.5 | 67.3 | 2.2 | |
World Avg | 36.8 | 12.6 | 3.0 | |
q=6. No data: 216 |
#belief #buddhism #christianity #folk_religion #god #hinduism #human_development #islam #judaism #no_religion #religion #religiosity #secularisation
#christianity #denmark #iceland #norway #paganism #sweden
In the 800s, the Vikings were still pagans, worshipping Thor, the sky god; Frey, the fertility god, and Odin, the war God, amongst others73. But Christianity had spread through Europe, tearing down pagan altars, destroying icons, and implanting its own symbols. They had short memories: when the Vikings came calling, the Christians of Europe were in turn horrified that they didn't have taboos against damaging religious sites73. The churches and monasteries were wealthy, and the Vikings raided them just as they would raid any other wealthy household or trader73.
Some Vikings, whilst on long raiding campaigns to the south, converted to Christianity and then returned home73. Viking chiefs began to appreciate "the political advantages that Christianity could bring them"73. Collecting tithes was not that different to raiding, except that it cost fewer lives. They knew from their plundering that Christian 'chiefs' were successful - and astoundingly, many victims came forth and delivered tithes on their own, as long as they believed in Christian versions of the afterlife. Over time, Christianity gained a foothold: Denmark's King Harald Bluetooth converted around 960CE, Norway followed in 995CE, and Sweden in the 11th century73. Local farmers with churches on their land took a share of the income, before sending funds on eventually to Rome73. Before long, pagans were the (non-tithe-paying) enemy and could be made to join the pyramid scheme once they were converted.
Tithing was so successful and the violent intolerance inherent in Christianity so dominant, that when Norway's King Olaf I converted and noticed that Iceland still had many pagans, he banned any trading with them and held them hostage if they visited, and done the same even to relatives of key pagans. He "threatened to mutilate or kill those hostages unless Iceland renounced paganism"73. This terrorist technique succeeded, and Iceland in 999 declared itself Christian73.
In other words, Scandinavian Christianity spread by force, just as Roman power originally spread it far and wide in Europe. However, this top-down enforced Christianity never really embedded itself naturally in the populations of Scandinavia. They resented its elitism and power structures74, and the churches themselves resented the power, land and finances that the Roman Catholic Church from them and so enforcers like the Inquisition never found support in the north75. Once Christianity couldn't be enforced, Scandinavia gradually became the least religious bloc in Europe.
Pos. | Religiosity (2018) Lower is better %42 | Disbelief In God (2007) Higher is better %76 | Jews (2010) %77 | Christians (2010) %77 | Muslims (2010) %77 | Hindus (2010) %77 | Buddhists (2010) %77 | Folk Religion (2010) %77 | Unaffiliated (2010) %77 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 9 | 48 | 0.1 | 83.5 | 4.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 11.8 |
2 | Finland | 10 | 28 | 0.1 | 81.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 17.6 |
3 | Iceland | 16 | 0.1 | 95.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 3.5 | |
4 | Norway | 19 | 31 | 0.1 | 84.7 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 10.1 |
5 | Sweden | 10 | 64 | 0.1 | 67.2 | 4.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 27.0 |
6 | Faroe Islands | 0.1 | 98.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.7 | ||
7 | Estonia | 6 | 49 | 0.1 | 39.9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 59.6 |
Scandinavia Avg | 10.8 | 39.3 | 0.1 | 78.6 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 18.8 | |
World Avg | 54.3 | 9.9 | 0.5 | 60.6 | 22.4 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 7.9 | |
q=7. No data: 15 |
Links:
Disbelief In God (2007)76 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | Higher is better %76 | |
1 | Sweden | 64 |
2 | Estonia | 49 |
3 | Denmark | 48 |
4 | Norway | 31 |
5 | Finland | 28 |
6= | Iceland | 16 |
Scandinavia Avg | 39.3 | |
q=6. |
Belief in God (2005)78 | ||
---|---|---|
Estonia | 16% | |
Sweden | 23% | |
Denmark | 31% | |
Norway | 32% | |
Iceland | 38% | |
Finland | 41% |
Religiosity (2018)42 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | Lower is better %42 | |
1 | Estonia | 6 |
2= | Denmark | 9 |
3 | Finland | 10 |
4= | Sweden | 10 |
5 | Norway | 19 |
Scandinavia Avg | 10.8 | |
q=5. |
The tables on the right give 3 different ways of looking at a similar trend. Firstly, the "Disbelief in God" and "Belief in God" tables are opposites - you can infer that if you add up the two values, what you are left with is those who are unsure. Because the datasets are obtained via different polls, using differently worded questions, you can expect irregular results as people's responses to questions on religion depend a lot on how the question is phrased. Local terms and associations colour people's perceptions of what is being asked. Even polytheists, who believe in many gods, will say "no" if asked "Do you believe in God?" as the capital-G-God might make them think that the question is really asking "Do you believe in the Abrahamic God of Judaism, Christianity or Islam?". So, wordings are important, which means poll results can differ more than expected. Nonetheless, the results of the two belief-in-god charts are quite harmonious - the two Scandinavian countries that disbelieve in god most strongly (Sweden and Estonia) are also those who believe in God least, and these are also two of the least religious countries in the world too.
#christianity #finland #norway #religion #scandinavia #secularism
The standard nordic religious structure combines a secular (non-religious) society with an anachronistic state-backed established church, for example the Lutheran church of Finland. Most people sign up for this church in order to obtain clergy for weddings and funerals. So, although 85% of Finns sign up, it "need not imply a deep belief in the tenets of Martin Luther"79. The local sociologist Kimmo Ketola says that "Finns are neither very attached to religion, nor very opposed to it"79. This is evidenced by the explosive popularity of a website designed to make it easy to resign from the state church. Set up by The Freethinkers of Tampere in 2003, by 2007 over 60 thousand people had used the site to resign and in total the Lutheran Church lost 2.6% of its adherents from 2000-200680. Over a generation of 60 years at the current rate, the Church will lose nearly a third of its membership by 2060.
“The Freethinkers of Tampere created a web site, Eroakirkosta.fi ("eroa kirkosta" roughly translates to "resign from the church"), in 2003 to assist people to resign from the state church to further the goal of separation of state and church, and to promote a secular society. The web site became a success; in 2006 79% of all resignations went through the site. The same figure was 69% in 2005, and 39% in 2004.”
www.eroakirkosta.fi (2007)80
With distinct pagan roots in Nordic warrior religions Nordics were never subjugated by Christian armies and the Inquisition never gained a hold75. They are now thoroughly secular societies. The sociologist of religion, Steve Bruce, says that Scandinavia became secular largely because the established churches represented the élite, "the masses found themselves little served by a state church which drew its professionals from the upper classes and advanced the ideological perspectives of the socially dominant"74. I have chartered the massive decline in religiosity in the UK, but Norway has much lower Church attendance81.
On top of that, Scandinavia, in particular Norway, has cultivated and spawned some powerful anti-religious movements. The Black Metal movement that grew to infamy in the 1990s hit the national newspapers with almost one-hundred church burnings, and espoused a venomously anti-Christian doctrine. Its adherents worshipped Odin, the Norse gods, and Satan. They wanted not only the continued decline of Christianity, but a revival of Nordic paganism. In addition, Scandinavia has a healthy population of LaVeyan Satanists.82
In Norway a government-appointed commission in 2006 proposed that the Lutheran Church be disestablished, similar "to changes made by the neighbouring (Lutheran) Church of Sweden, in 2000", the UK's National Secular Society reported:
“CHURCH OF NORWAY VOTES TO DISESTABLISH ITSELF
The Lutheran Church of Norway has voted to separate itself from the state after 500 years of establishment. Sixty-three of 85 synod delegates voted that the church should no longer be referred to in the country's constitution as a State or national church. The synod wants the church to be founded on a separate act passed by parliament. The general synod said it should itself assume all church authority now resting with the king and the government."The synod's decision is historic", said Jens Petter Johnsen, director of the Church of Norway national council. "What matters is the relationship between Church and people, not between Church and State. We will do our utmost to strengthen the service of the church and with our people."
[...] The changes in the State Church system will require a revision of the country's constitution and some officials see 2013 as the earliest date. The State-Church system was established in Norway in 1537, when the Danish king endorsed the Lutheran reformation.”
National Secular Society newsletter (2006 Dec 01)
#denmark #faroe_islands #finland #iceland #norway #sweden
The Essential World Atlas describes the geographical features of Scandinavia: "Scandinavia is the wide peninsula that divides the Norwegian Sea from the Baltic Sea and Gulf of Bothnia. [...] The Scandinavian Peninsula is dominated by a mountain chain that runs for almost its entire length. In the west, the peaks and plateaus drop steeply to the sea. To the east, they incline more gently towards Sweden's coastal and southern lowlands, and the flat, lake-studded terrain that covers most of Finland. Separated from Sweden by a sliver of sea, Denmark consists of fertile plains and low hills. In stark contrast, far-flung Iceland is a mountainous, mostly barren land that continues to be fashioned by earthquakes, volcanoes, and Europe's largest glaciers."83.
Various definitions lead to different lists of which countries are Scandinavian or Nordic. Daftly, some people even get offended by others' definitions. Scandinavica.com tries to clear it up84:
Geographically speaking, the Scandinavian peninsula is a territory shared by Norway, Sweden and northern Finland. The Scandinavian countries would therefore only be Norway and Sweden.
Linguistically, Swedish, Norwegian and Danish have a common word called "Skandinavien" which refers to the ancient territories of the Norsemen, and for most people in these three countries "Scandinavia" consists only of Sweden, Norway and Denmark. This one is considered to be the most commonly accepted definition of "Scandinavia". However, Iceland was also a Norse territory and Icelandic belongs to the same linguistic family as Swedish, Norwegian and Danish. And so does the Faroe islands. Therefore, you will find some people for which Scandinavia is Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. And finally, Swedish language is also spoken in Finland and reciprocally, Finnish and Sami languages are spoken in Sweden and Norway. Again, we have a new definition of Scandinavia, which would include Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland and Finland.
Culturally and historically, the north of Europe has been the political playground of the kingdoms of Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Finland was a part of the kingdom of Sweden and Iceland belonged to Norway and Denmark. Besides a common history, politically and economically these five countries have followed a similar model known as the Nordic welfare state since the 20th century. One more time, these five countries are perceived as an unity by some and therefore called by the same name: "Scandinavia".
What are the "Nordic countries"? In such a state of linguistic and geographical confusion, the French came to help us all and invented the term "Pays Nordiques" or "Nordic Countries", which has become the most standard term to bring together Scandinavia, Iceland and Finland under the same umbrella.
#baltic_states #estonia #finland #latvia #lithuania #russia #scandinavia #sweden
Estonia is traditionally considered one of the Baltic nations (alongside Latvia and Lithuania). But as the colonial history of Sweden provides a 100-year window where Estonia was 'scandinavian' due to being ruled by Sweden, it borders the Gulf of Finland, and as it shares many cultural, some linguistic, and economic factors with Scandinavia, some have called for Estonia to be considered Scandinavian85. The Prime Minister of Sweden) from 1991-1994, Mr Bildt, did describe Estonia as part of Scandinavia11 in 2006, but, this claim remains largely ignored. The historical connection to Sweden is tenuous. The public will require time and much convincing if Estonia is to be considered Scandinavian rather than Baltic.
16th Century: Sweden slowly increased their grasp of the eastern shores of the Baltic and during the rule of Erik XIV from 1567 Sweden saw northern Estonia steadily absorbed into their empire. Gustav II Adolf from 1611, invaded Latvia and consolidated Swedish rule of the eastern side of the Baltic. During the reign of King Karl XII, who ruled the Swedish empire from 1697 to 1718, Latvia and Estonia were lost to the Russians after a defeat at Poltava in 1709.86.
Sweden Kingdom of Sweden [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
---|---|
Status | Independent State |
Social and Moral Index | 4th best |
Capital | Stockholm |
Land Area | 410 340km24 |
Location | Europe, Scandinavia |
Population | 10.0m2 |
Life Expectancy | 82.98yrs (2017)87 |
GNI | $54 489 (2017)88 |
ISO3166-1 Codes | SE, SWE, 75289 |
Internet Domain | .se90 |
Currency | Kronoa (SEK)91 |
Telephone | +4692 |
The Best Country in the World! Listed as the 6th best country in the United Nations Human Development Report 2005. Sweden in 1919 was part of the general European rush towards female emancipation, although it was not a world leader in equal votes for women it was still one of the first 10% of the world to arrive there. In modern times, Sweden has the best record for gender equality across a range of issues. It has the worlds' sixth highest life expectancy. The Economist Quality of Life study states that Sweden is the fifth best place to live. From 2001 to the 2003-2004 and 2006 reports, the World Economic Forum has shown Sweden is consistently the third most economically competitive country. Its government was the first, in 1987, to recognize same sex partnerships. One of the least obese countries (10.4% of the population, perhaps 8th least obese in the developed world). Sweden has the best 'high literacy' rate in the world, and not just by a small margin! For a developed country, Swedes do not smoke much and do not drink much; both far less than Western averages. Sweden ranks top in allowing open access to scientific research. In 2005, out of the worlds' most developed countries, Sweden was fourth most generous in giving aid to developing countries, and in 2006 was the 3rd best country for the poor. It has the 7th lowest level of computer software piracy. Transparency International finds Sweden to be the joint fourth for lack of corruption.
“The most successful society the world has ever known.”
The Guardian93
Sweden is one of the world's best recyclers, and Stockholm hosts the world's second-largest hydrothermal cooling system, saving megawatts of energy that would otherwise be used to electrically power air conditioning94.
“Every country has its stereotypes and clichés but, let's face it, who wouldn't want to live up to the image that Sweden has in the outside world? A nation of tall, blonde, attractive types, famously open-minded and nonaggressive (well, at least in the recent past). A country full of athletic folk [...] at the cutting edge of technology (think Ericsson), well cared-for by the state and living very comfortable lives: flash cars parked in the garage (think Volvo and Saab) [...]. Dig even slightly below the glossy surface and you'll find more to be impressed by. [...] Sweden is also home of the Nobel Peace Prize.”
For up to date statistics, see: Sweden.
Denmark Kingdom of Denmark [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
---|---|
Status | Independent State |
Social and Moral Index | The Best (#1) |
Capital | Copenhagen |
Land Area | 42 430km24 |
Location | Europe, Scandinavia |
Population | 5.8m2 |
Life Expectancy | 81.38yrs (2017)87 |
GNI | $60 365 (2017)88 |
ISO3166-1 Codes | DK, DNK, 20889 |
Internet Domain | .dk95 |
Currency | Krone (DKK)91 |
Telephone | +4592 |
Only listed as 14th in the world by the United Nations Human Development Report, Denmark is nonetheless a consistent high-ranker in many of the moral issues examined on this page. The World Economic Forum lists Denmark as the 4th most equal country in terms of gender, and was beaten by only four other countries in the historical granting of equal votes to women. The Economist's World in 2005 survey had Denmark rank as the ninth best country for quality of life. The fourth most competitive economy. Gay rights were attained in the 1990s, beaten only by a handful of states. One of the least obese countries in the world. The 3rd best country in the world for high adult literacy. One of the best countries towards the environment; one of the best recyclers. Open Access to scientific research speeds up scientific discovery and advances humanity, Denmark is the 7th most open country in the world. When it comes to accepting asylum seekers, Denmark accepts more than anyone else (74%). It also gives aid third most generously, and does not tie its aid in to its own economy. The Center for Global Development says that Denmark is the second best country at helping the poor of the world. Denmark has the fifth lowest rate of computer software piracy. Transparency International rates Denmark as (jointly) the least corrupt country.
Denmark's Labour Market:
“Unemployment, at 4.5%, is at its lowest in over 30 years, inflation is below the euro-area average and growth is faster. The budget surplus hit 3.9% of GDP in 2005. It is Denmark's exceptional performance on jobs that has attracted most attention. [...] The government cannot take all the credit, but many economists fulsomely praise "flexicurity" - a peculiarly Danish blend of a flexible labour market, generous social security and an active labour-market policy with rights and obligations for the unemployed.”
The Economist (2006)96
For up to date statistics, see: Denmark.
Norway Kingdom of Norway [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
---|---|
Status | Independent State |
Social and Moral Index | 2nd best |
Capital | Oslo |
Land Area | 304 250km24 |
Location | Europe, Scandinavia |
Population | 5.3m2 |
Life Expectancy | 83.23yrs (2017)87 |
GNI | $64 660 (2017)88 |
ISO3166-1 Codes | NO, NOR, 57889 |
Internet Domain | .no97 |
Currency | Krone (NOK)91 |
Telephone | +4792 |
Impressively listed as the best country in the United Nations Human Development Report every year since 2001. The fourth country to allow women the same voting rights as men, in 1913 and coming in 2nd best in the world for gender equality overall. The 12th best life expectancy in the world. The third best country to live in for quality of life. One of the world's most economically competitive countries, coming in annually around 6th (2003-2004) and 12th (2006). It was the second country to officially recognize same-sex marriages, granting almost full legal equality for gay partnerships in 1993. Impressively Norway is the fourth least obese developed nation in the world, only 8.3% of the population are obese. Norway has the second highest high literacy level in the world, second only to Sweden. Norway gives a higher percentage of its National Income as foreign aid than does any other country, and was the 4th best country for the poor in 2006.
However its capital city, Oslo, is the most expensive city to live in in the world (2006, 2007) 98. Norway's wealth comes largely from its off-shore oil deposits, and it very wisely invests much of this for future generations99.
For up to date statistics, see: Norway.
#australia #denmark #finland #new_zealand #switzerland #USA
Finland Republic of Finland [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
---|---|
Status | Independent State |
Social and Moral Index | 6th best |
Capital | Helsinki |
Land Area | 303 890km24 |
Location | Europe, Scandinavia |
Population | 5.5m2 |
Life Expectancy | 82.04yrs (2017)87 |
GNI | $49 452 (2017)88 |
ISO3166-1 Codes | FI, FIN, 24689 |
Internet Domain | .fi100 |
Currency | Euro (EUR)91 |
Telephone | +35892 |
Listed as the 13th best country in the United Nations Human Development Report 2005. One of the first countries to give women equal votes with men, beaten only by New Zealand and Australia in 1893 and 1902 respectively. Judging by a range of criteria Finland is in modern times the fifth best country for gender equality. 19th best life expectancy. The most economically competitive country according to the 2001, 2003, and 2004-5 reports from the World Economic Forum (and 2nd place to Switzerland in 2006), with the USA as their hottest contender and previous title-holder. Finland was not one of the first countries where legal equality for homosexuals were attained, but in 2002 it is still ahead the majority of the countries in the world that have not yet got there. Perhaps one of the least obese countries, 10th or so in the developed world. Finland is the fourth best country in the world for high literacy. Open access to scientific research is beneficial to humanity; Finland is the sixth most open country in the world. The 7th best country for the world's poor, in 2006. It has the 4th lowest computer software piracy rate. Transparency International rates Denmark as (jointly) the least corrupt country.
“[Despite having been in] one of the worst recessions any European country has seen [...] their small country (5m people) is at or near the top of most league tables: [...] first in the OECD's world ranking of educational performance; second-highest share of R&D spending in the European Union. The country is reversing its demographic decline: its fertility rate is one of the highest in Europe. A Finnish group even won this years' Eurovision song contest.”
The Economist (2006)101
The 'real lesson' to learn from Finland is organisation and responsibility. Its government makes tough political decisions that are unpopular but good for the long-term health of the country101, and has a powerful green lobby, showing responsibility for both self-care and world-care.
“Around two-thirds of Finland is covered in forest and about a tenth by water. In the far north the White Nights, during which the sun does not set, last for around 10 weeks of the summer. In winter the same area goes through nearly eight weeks when the sun never rises above the horizon.”
BBC Website102
http://www2.helsinginsanomat.fi/ lists:
For up to date statistics, see: Finland.
#belgium #denmark #finland #iceland #norway #sweden #UK
Taxes (% of GDP) (2006)
On Income, Wealth, etc. (not trade).
Rank | 2000 | 2004 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Denmark | 30.3 | Denmark | 30.1 |
2. | Sweden | 22.2 | Norway | 21.7 |
3. | Finland | 21.3 | Iceland | 19.4 |
4. | Norway | 20.2 | Sweden | 19.4 |
5. | Belgium | 17.1 | Finland | 17.8 |
6. | UK | 16.6 | Belgium | 16.8 |
7. | Iceland | 16.5 | UK | 15.6 |
EU Average (EU25) | 13.8 | 12.5 |
Source: Eurostat103
The Nordic states consistently have the world's highest taxes96 (see chart), pursued half-heartedly by Belgium and the UK and the most expensive living costs. Those who live there tend not to complain, as they have a very high quality of life, but, immigrants and outsiders could easily be overwhelmed.
An issue of the future is the demographic shift towards an older population - the 'demographic crises', something all developed countries are having to face up to. Although low unemployment may sound good; a combination of a labour shortage and a greying workforce means that many Nordic countries' economies have are being throttled. As a result, wages will rise as companies cling to their existing employees, and therefore exports will suffer due to an increase in the cost of goods.
“The Swedish response has been the most radical: a proposal that will virtually guarantee entry to any non-EU worker with a job offer from a Swedish employer. [...] The labour minister, Tobias Billstrom, says foreign workers are needed to counter a greying population and shrinking labour force.”
The Economist (2008)104