https://www.humantruth.info/israel_human_rights_and_freedom.html
By Vexen Crabtree 2018
#gaza_strip #gender #israel #israel_gender #misogyny #palestine #west_bank #women
| Israel State of Israel [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
|---|---|
| Status | Independent State |
| Social and Moral Index | 39th best |
| Location | Asia, The Mediterranean, The Middle East |
| Population | 8.4m1 |
| Life Expectancy | 82.26yrs (2017)2 |
Israel does relatively well in ensuring human rights and freedom, compared to many other countries. Israel does better than average in opposing gender inequality3, combatting modern slavery4, LGBT equality in the 2020s5 and in its average Freedom in the World rating. But, things still need to improve in Israel. Israel does worse than average in commentary in Human Rights Watch reports6, supporting press freedom7 (still high for Asia), its nominal commitment to Human Rights8 and in freethought9. Critics of Israel (including journalists) faced increasing restrictions in 201710 and its blasphemy law is too vague and wide-ranging11. The Israeli government continues to enforce severe and discriminatory restrictions on Palestinians´ human rights and restricts movement in/out of the Gaza Strip10. Israel does not investigate violent abuses committed by its security forces in Palestinian areas. Unfortunately, the Palestinian Authority (PA) in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza both conducted their own crackdowns on their own citizens, including making arbitrary arrests and persecuting dissenters.10
#equality #freedom #gaza_strip #gender_equality #human_rights #israel #morals #palestine #politics #prejudice #tolerance
| Compared to Asia (2025)12 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank12 | |
| 1 | Japan | 31.6 |
| 2 | Taiwan | 42.2 |
| 3 | S. Korea | 45.2 |
| 4 | Cyprus | 49.2 |
| 5 | Israel | 64.8 |
| 6 | Philippines | 81.0 |
| 7 | Mongolia | 81.6 |
| 8 | Timor-Leste (E. Timor) | 81.8 |
| 9 | Thailand | 82.1 |
| 10 | Georgia | 83.0 |
| 11 | Hong Kong | 83.9 |
| 12 | Nepal | 93.0 |
| 13 | Singapore | 97.8 |
| Asia Avg | 110.11 | |
| q=51. | ||
| Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025)12 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank12 | |
| 1 | Sweden | 7.5 |
| 2 | Netherlands | 8.6 |
| 3 | Denmark | 9.0 |
| ... | ||
| 45 | Monaco | 61.1 |
| 46 | Chile | 61.4 |
| 47 | Montenegro | 64.3 |
| 48 | Israel | 64.8 |
| 49 | Cape Verde | 65.1 |
| 50 | Bolivia | 65.3 |
| 51 | Mexico | 66.3 |
| 52 | Serbia | 67.5 |
| World Avg | 90.04 | |
| q=198. | ||
The best countries in the world at ensuring human rights, fostering equality and promoting tolerance, are Sweden, The Netherlands and Denmark13. These countries are displaying the best traits that humanity has to offer. The worst countries are Somalia, Eritrea and Saudi Arabia13.
30 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on supporting press freedom, combatting modern slavery, its average Freedom in the World rating, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports, its nominal commitment to Human Rights, speed of uptake of HR treaties, opposing gender inequality, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators), the year from which women could participate in democracy, its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, LGBT equality and freethought. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe13, whereas the worst are The Middle East, Africa and Asia13.
For more, see:
Amnesty International's 2023-23 summary on human rights in Israel stated:
“Israel’s continuing oppressive and discriminatory system of governing Palestinians in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) constituted a system of apartheid, and Israeli officials committed the crime of apartheid under international law. Israeli forces launched a three-day offensive on the occupied Gaza Strip in August during which they committed apparent war crimes. This compounded the impact of a 15-year ongoing Israeli blockade that amounts to illegal collective punishment and further fragments Palestinian territory. Israel escalated its crackdown on Palestinians’ freedom of association. It also imposed arbitrary restrictions on freedom of movement and closures that amounted to collective punishment, mainly in the northern West Bank, ostensibly in response to armed attacks by Palestinians on Israeli soldiers and settlers. The year saw a rise in the number of Palestinians unlawfully killed and seriously injured by Israeli forces during raids in the West Bank. Administrative detentions of Palestinians hit a 14-year high, and torture and other ill treatment continued. Israeli forces demolished al-Araqib village in the Negev/ Naqab for the 211th time. A further 35 Palestinian-Bedouin towns in Israel were still denied formal recognition and residents faced possible forcible transfer. Authorities failed to process asylum claims for thousands of asylum seekers, and imposed restrictions on their right to work.”
"The State of the World's Human Rights 2022/23" by Amnesty International (2023)14
“The Israeli government continued to enforce severe and discriminatory restrictions on Palestinians´ human rights; restrict the movement of people and goods into and out of the Gaza Strip; and facilitate the unlawful transfer of Israeli citizens to settlements in the occupied West Bank. Punitive measures taken by the Palestinian Authority (PA) exacerbated the humanitarian crisis in Gaza caused by the closure enforced by Israel. The PA in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza escalated crackdowns on dissent, arbitrarily arresting critics, and abusing those in their custody. [...]
The Israeli government continued its openly stated policy of rendering “miserable” the lives of the roughly 40,000 Eritrean and Sudanese asylum seekers present in the country in order to induce them to depart. These measures include prolonged detention; restrictions on freedom of movement; ambiguous policies on permission to work; and restricting access to health care.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)10
#democracy #freedom #Freedom_of_Speech #Good_Governance #mass_media #politics #UK
| Press Freedom Higher is better7 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20257 | |
| 1 | Norway | 92.31 |
| 2 | Estonia | 89.46 |
| 3 | Netherlands | 88.64 |
| ... | ||
| 108 | S. Sudan | 51.63 |
| 109 | Guinea-Bissau | 51.36 |
| 110 | Haiti | 51.06 |
| 111 | Israel | 51.06 |
| 112 | Madagascar | 50.80 |
| 113 | Georgia | 50.53 |
| 114 | Colombia | 49.80 |
| 115 | Philippines | 49.57 |
| Asia Avg | 39.69 | |
| World Avg | 54.65 | |
| q=179. Also scored for 2000s-2010s. | ||
The freedom to investigate, publish information, and have access to others' opinion is a fundamental part of today's information-driven world, and is linked with Freedom of Speech and Good Governance. Scores on the Press Freedom Index are calculated according to indicators including pluralism - the degree to which opinions are represented in the media, media independence of authorities, self-censorship, legislation, transparency and the infrastructure that supports news and information, and, the level of violence against journalists which includes lengths of imprisonments. The index "does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted". The rankings are used as one of the datasets of the Social and Moral Development Index15
It must be noted that press freedom is not an indicator of press quality and the press itself can be abusive; the UK suffers in particular from a popular brand of nasty reporting that infuses several of its newspapers who are particularly prone to running destructive and often untrue campaigns against victims. The Press Freedom Index notes that "the index should in no way be taken as an indicator of the quality of the media in the countries concerned".
For more, see:
“Israeli authorities have continued to narrow the space for criticism of its policies toward Palestinians. In March, the Knesset passed a law barring entry to foreigners who call for boycotting Israel or settlements. Authorities continue to impose onerous reporting requirements on nongovernment organizations receiving most of their funding from foreign government entities.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)10
Averages by decade for Israel (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Press Freedom | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|
| Israel: | 20.00 | 68.44 |
| World Rank: | 78th | ⇣ 96th |
| World Avg: | 27.44 | 65.91 |
#burundi #eritrea #human_rights #indonesia #slavery
| Slavery in the 2020s Lower is better4 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Slavery in the 2020s Per 10004 | |
| 1= | Switzerland | 0.50 |
| 1= | Norway | 0.50 |
| 3= | Germany | 0.60 |
| ... | ||
| 45 | Swaziland | 3.60 |
| 46 | Burkina Faso | 3.70 |
| 47= | Portugal | 3.80 |
| 47= | Israel | 3.80 |
| 49= | Guinea | 4.00 |
| 49= | Sudan | 4.00 |
| 49= | China | 4.00 |
| 49= | Mongolia | 4.00 |
| Asia Avg | 9.89 | |
| World Avg | 7.15 | |
| q=160. Also scored for 2010s-2020s. | ||
Modern slavery includes forced labour (often of the under-age), debt bondage (especially generational), sexual slavery, chattel slavery and other forms of abuse, some of which can be surprisingly difficult to detect, but often target those fleeing from warzones, and the poverty-stricken vulnerable.16. Some industries (diamond, clothing, coal) from some countries (Burundi17, Eritrea17, Indonesia18) are a particular concern. The Walk Free Foundation, say in their 2023 report, that 50 million people are living in modern slavery17, and, nearly two-thirds of those in forced labour are employed at the end of supply chains working for large multinationals that creating products consumed by rich countries19.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Israel (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Slavery | 2010s Average | 2020s Average |
|---|---|---|
| Israel: | 3.90 | 3.80 |
| World Rank: | 78th | ⇡ 47th |
| World Avg: | 6.54 | 7.15 |
#freedom #human_rights #hungary #politics #USA
| Freedom in the World Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2024 Score | |
| 1= | Norway | 1.0 |
| 1= | Canada | 1.0 |
| 1= | Cape Verde | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 75= | Ghana | 2.0 |
| 76= | Timor-Leste (E. Timor) | 2.5 |
| 76= | Senegal | 2.5 |
| 76= | Israel | 2.5 |
| 76= | Solomon Islands | 2.5 |
| 76= | Colombia | 2.5 |
| 76= | Nauru | 2.5 |
| 76= | Lesotho | 2.5 |
| Asia Avg | 5.0 | |
| World Avg | 3.7 | |
| q=205. Also scored for 1970s-2010s. | ||
Freedom House's long-standing annual report has been running since the 1970s, collecting data on political rights (PR) and civil liberties (CL). Their reports rate countries as "Free", "Partially Free" or "Not Free", however the results here are based on their numerical values. Many countries score the best combination of scores (1 and 1), which is why the table of results show many places equally placed in 1st place. In the past two decades, some well-established democracies like the USA and Hungary have been falling. Whilst most of the world in general is improving rights and freedoms over time, the 2020s has seen some regression.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Israel (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Freedom in the World | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Israel: | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| World Rank: | 39th | ⇡ 38th | ⇣ 55th | ⇣ 62nd | ⇡ 59th |
| World Avg: | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| Human Rights Watch Comments Higher is better6 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2017 Score6 | |
| 1= | UK | 9 |
| 1= | France | 9 |
| 1= | Germany | 9 |
| ... | ||
| 87= | Tajikistan | -5 |
| 87= | Lebanon | -5 |
| 87= | Mali | -5 |
| 87= | Israel | -5 |
| 91= | UAE | -6 |
| 91= | Rwanda | -6 |
| 91= | Uzbekistan | -6 |
| 91= | Iraq | -6 |
| Asia Avg | -5.0 | |
| World Avg | -1.9 | |
| q=123. | ||
Human Rights Watch comments concentrate mostly on negative issues, however, they also make positive comments for those countries that engage in human rights defence around the world, or who make improvements at home. By adding up positive and negative comments (including double-points for negatives that involve large scales and crimes against humanity), the Social and Moral Index turns HRW commentary into quantified values. Some countries may be unfairly penalized because HRW have not examined them, and, some countries "get away" with abuses if they manage to hide it, or if it goes unnoticed - a negative point has been given for those countries in which HRW specifically state that access to investigators has been barred. The points were limited to a minimum of -10 because there are some points at which things are so bad, with abuses affecting so many, it is difficult to be more specific about the depths of the issues.
For more, see:
| Nominal Commitment to HR Higher is better8 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2009 Treaties8 | |
| 1 | Argentina | 24 |
| 2= | Chile | 23 |
| 2= | Costa Rica | 23 |
| ... | ||
| 139= | Dominica | 12 |
| 139= | Central African Rep. | 12 |
| 139= | Bahrain | 12 |
| 139= | Israel | 12 |
| 139= | Angola | 12 |
| 139= | Suriname | 12 |
| 139= | Kuwait | 12 |
| 139= | Trinidad & Tobago | 12 |
| Asia Avg | 12.7 | |
| World Avg | 15.1 | |
| q=194. | ||
There are many international agreements on Human Rights, and, many mechanisms by which countries can be brought to account for their actions. Together, these have been the biggest historical movement in the fight against oppression and inhumanity. Or, putting it another way: these are rejected mostly by those who wish to oppress inhumanely. None of them are perfect and many people object to various components and wordings, but, no-one has come up with, and enforced, better methods of controlling the occasional desires that states and peoples have of causing angst for other states and peoples in a violent, unjust or inhumane way. Points are awarded for the number of Human Rights agreements ratified by the country, plus the acceptance of the petition mechanisms for disputes. The maximum possible score in 2009 was 24.
For more, see:
#human_rights #international_law #micronesia #politics #small_islands
| HR Treaties Lag Lower is better20 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2019 Avg Yrs/Treaty20 | |
| 1 | Ecuador | 2.15 |
| 2 | Uruguay | 2.25 |
| 3 | Tunisia | 3.65 |
| ... | ||
| 104 | Zambia | 10.81 |
| 105 | Iran | 10.81 |
| 106 | Albania | 10.94 |
| 107 | Israel | 10.97 |
| 108 | Armenia | 11.00 |
| 109 | Lithuania | 11.03 |
| 110 | Mozambique | 11.04 |
| 111 | Tajikistan | 11.08 |
| Asia Avg | 10.97 | |
| World Avg | 10.02 | |
| q=195. | ||
Human Rights (HR) Treaties Lag is a count of how long it took each country to sign each of 11 key HR treaties. From the date of the first signatory of each treaty, all other countries have one point added to their score for each day they delayed in signing. Results are presented as average time in years to sign each one. The lower a country's score, the more enthusiastically it has taken on international Human Rights Treaties - which are, of course, minimal standards of good governance. The slowest are the countries of Micronesia, Melanesia, Australasia and Polynesia all lagged by over 12 years per treaty. The best regions are The Americas, Scandinavia and the Mediterranean.
For more, see:
Israel is notable for its equality between the sexes.
See:
#gender #gender_equality #human_rights #misogyny #women
| Gender Inequality Lower is better3 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20223 | |
| 1 | Denmark | 0.01 |
| 2 | Norway | 0.01 |
| 3 | Switzerland | 0.02 |
| ... | ||
| 22 | Japan | 0.08 |
| 23 | France | 0.08 |
| 24 | New Zealand | 0.09 |
| 25 | Israel | 0.09 |
| 26 | Croatia | 0.09 |
| 27 | Estonia | 0.10 |
| 28 | UK | 0.10 |
| 29 | Belarus | 0.10 |
| Asia Avg | 0.33 | |
| World Avg | 0.34 | |
| q=166. Also scored for 1990s-2010s. | ||
The UN Human Development Reports include statistics on gender equality which take into account things like maternal mortality, access to political power (seats in parliament) and differences between male and female education rates. Gender inequality is not a necessary part of early human development. Although a separation of roles is almost universal due to different strengths between the genders, this does not have to mean that women are subdued, and, such patriarchalism is not universal in ancient history. Those cultures and peoples who shed, or never developed, the idea that mankind ought to dominate womankind, are better cultures and peoples than those who, even today, cling violently to those mores.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Israel (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Gender Inequality | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Israel: | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.11 |
| World Rank: | 33rd | ⇡ 25th | ⇡ 23rd |
| World Avg: | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.37 |
#christianity #gender_equality #human_rights #politics #women
| Year Women Can Vote Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Year Women Can Vote Year | |
| 1 | New Zealand | 1893 |
| 2 | Australia | 1902 |
| 3 | Finland | 1906 |
| ... | ||
| 70= | Malta | 1947 |
| 70= | Argentina | 1947 |
| 72= | S. Korea | 1948 |
| 72= | Israel | 1948 |
| 72= | Belgium | 1948 |
| 72= | Niger | 1948 |
| 72= | Suriname | 1948 |
| 72= | Seychelles | 1948 |
| Asia Avg | 1907 | |
| World Avg | 1930 | |
| q=189. | ||
Women now have equal rights in the vast majority of countries across the world. Although academic literature oftens talks of when a country "grants women the right to vote", this enforces a backwards way of thinking. Women always had the right to vote, however, they were frequently denied that right. The opposition to women's ability to vote in equality with man was most consistently and powerfully opposed by the Catholic Church, other Christian organisations, Islamic authorities and some other religious and secular traditionalists.
For more, see:
#2020s #equality #homosexuality #human_rights #ICCPR #intolerance #sexuality #tolerance
| LGBT Equality in the 2020s Higher is better5 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | LGBT Equality in the 2020s Score5 | |
| 1= | Germany | 4.88 |
| 1= | Spain | 4.88 |
| 3 | Portugal | 4.81 |
| ... | ||
| 54= | Jersey | 1.62 |
| 54= | Sint Eustatius | 1.62 |
| 54= | Saba | 1.62 |
| 57 | Israel | 1.58 |
| 58 | Taiwan | 1.57 |
| 59 | Cayman Islands | 1.35 |
| 60 | Falkland Islands | 1.33 |
| 61 | S. Korea | 1.26 |
| Asia Avg | -2.88 | |
| World Avg | -1.21 | |
| q=215. Also scored for 1970s-2020s. | ||
Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) folk is rife across the world. Legal restrictions co-exist alongside social stigmatisation and physical violence21. LGBT tolerance and equal rights have been fought for country-by-country against tightly entrenched cultural and religious opposition. Adult consensual sexual activity is a Human Right and protected by privacy laws22. Despite this, it is illegal to be homosexual in over 60 countries (as of 2025)23. The Vexen LGBT Equality Index as part of the Social and Moral Development Index grants points to each country depending on its LGBT stance since the 1970s24,25. Europe is by far the least prejudiced region, but in the Middle East and Africa cultural prejudice goes hand-in-hand with state intolerance, all too often including physical violence.
For more, see:
Homosexuality has been legal in Israel since 1988, though laws against sodomy had not been enforced since 1953, when the Attorney General declared sodomy laws would not be enforced against consenting adults (confirmed by its Supreme Court in 1963). Same-sex marriages performed abroad are recognized, adoption rights are available, discrimination protections are strong, and LGBTQ people serve openly in the military. The High Court of Justice unanimously ruled in 2023 that the 1981 law must be interpreted to allow sameâ€`sex couples to adopt, stating that the law's intent was to ensure children were placed in stable twoâ€`parent families, not specifically heterosexual ones.ILGA researchers in 2017 found that Israel had legal protections against anti-LGBT employment discrimination, .
Actions taken at the United Nations:
Averages by decade for Israel (for the ranks, lower is better):
| LGBT Equality | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average | 2020s Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Israel: | -2.00 | -1.70 | 0.95 | 2.20 | 2.25 | 1.58 |
| World Rank: | 64th | ⇣ 70th | ⇡ 10th | ⇣ 43rd | ⇣ 54th | ⇣ 57th |
| World Avg: | -2.98 | -2.87 | -2.60 | -2.15 | -1.10 | -1.21 |
#europe #freedom_of_belief #freethought #human_rights #netherlands #religion #religious_tolerance #secularism #the_enlightenment
| Freedom of Thought Lower is better9 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20219 | |
| 1= | Belgium | 1.0 |
| 1= | Taiwan | 1.0 |
| 1= | Netherlands | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 155= | Sri Lanka | 3.8 |
| 155= | Russia | 3.8 |
| 155= | Belarus | 3.8 |
| 155= | Israel | 3.8 |
| 155= | Palestine | 3.8 |
| 155= | Oman | 3.8 |
| 161= | Azerbaijan | 4.0 |
| 161= | Algeria | 4.0 |
| Asia Avg | 3.7 | |
| World Avg | 3.0 | |
| q=196. | ||
Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Belief are upheld in Article 18 the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights26. It affirms that it is a basic human right that all people are free to change their beliefs and religion as they wish27. No countries voted against this (although eight abstained). This right was first recognized clearly in the policies of religious toleration of the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe in the post-enlightenment era28 of the 19th century. In democratic countries, freedom of belief and religion is now taken for granted29. In 2016 a study found that over 180 countries in the world had come to guarantee freedom of religion and belief30. The best countries at doing so are Belgium, The Netherlands and Taiwan9,31 and the worst: Afghanistan, N. Korea, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia9,32.
Long-term studies have shown that religious violence and persecution both decrease in cultures where religious freedom is guaranteed33. Despite this, there still are many who are strongly against freedom of belief27, including entire cultures and many individual communities of religious believers. Their alternative is that you are not free to believe what you want and they often state that you cannot change religion without being punished (often including the death penalty): this is bemoaned as one of the most dangerous elements of religion34 and "the denial of religious freedoms is inevitably intertwined with the denial of other freedoms"35 and the solution is, everywhere, to allow religious freedom and the freedom of belief.
For more, see:
#israel #judaism #religion_in_israel
Israel upholds the human rights of freedom of belief and freedom of religion, however, "governmental and legal discrimination" exists against those who do not belong to orthodox Judaism, "for example practicing Jews who are not Orthodox must leave the country to marry"11. Israel's blasphemy law (Article 173) is too vague and wide-ranging11.
The International Humanist and Ethical Union produced a report in 2012 entitled "Freedom of Thought" (2012)11, in which they document bias and prejudice at the national level that is based on religion, belief and/or lack of belief. Their entry for Israel states:
“While there is no formal constitution, Israel's Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the Basic Law on Human Dignity and Liberty protects freedom of religion or belief. The Basic Law describes the country as a "Jewish and democratic state" and references the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel, which promises religious freedom and full social and political equality, regardless of religious affiliation. However, governmental and legal discrimination against non-Jews, and non-Orthodox streams of Judaism including Secular Humanistic Judaism, continued. As a "Jewish State" some laws and policies promote certain Orthodox Jewish values over those of other religious beliefs.
Each officially recognized religious community has legal authority over its members in matters of marriage, divorce, and burial, limiting the freedom of many individuals who may not otherwise subject themselves to the authority of those religious communities. Orthodox control of Jewish family law continues to create problems for non-Orthodox Jewish families; for example practicing Jews who are not Orthodox must leave the country to marry. The government does not allow civil marriages, such as secular ceremonies performed by state or municipal authorities, or marriages performed by non-Orthodox rabbis. Secular marriages, non-Orthodox marriages of Jews, or interfaith marriages must take place abroad to be recognized by the government. As a result, several hundred thousand citizens cannot marry within their own country due to either a lack of eligibility or their desire to wed outside of the rabbinic system. In 2010, a bill was passed that allows a limited right to an alternative form of civil marriage ("couplehood union" status) for Israelis who declare a non-religious status.
The religious freedom Article 173 of the country's penal code allows for one year imprisonment if "One publishes a publication that is liable to crudely offend the religious faith or sentiment of others," or if "One voices in a public place and in the hearing of another person any word or sound that is liable to crudely offend the religious faith or sentiment of others."”
"Freedom of Thought" by IHEU (2012)11