https://www.humantruth.info/paraguay_human_rights_and_freedom.html
By Vexen Crabtree 2022
| Paraguay Republic of Paraguay [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
|---|---|
| Status | Independent State |
| Social and Moral Index | 97th best |
| Capital | Asuncion |
| Land Area | 397 300km21 |
| Location | South America, The Americas |
| Population | 7.0m2 |
| Life Expectancy | 70.26yrs (2017)3 |
| GNI | $12 349 (2017)4 |
| ISO3166-1 Codes | PY, PRY, 6005 |
| Internet Domain | .py6 |
| Currency | Guarani (PYG)7 |
| Telephone | +5958 |
Paraguay does relatively well in ensuring human rights and freedom, compared to many other countries. Paraguay does the second-best for its nominal commitment to Human Rights9. It does better than average in terms of commentary in Human Rights Watch reports10, LGBT equality in the 2020s11, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms12 (but bad for The Americas), supporting press freedom13 and in its average Freedom in the World rating (but high for The Americas). Along with 11 others, Paraguay signed the Lima Declaration in 2017, condemning "the assault on democratic order and the systematic violation of human rights in Venezuela"14.
But, things still need to improve in Paraguay. Paraguay does worse than average when it comes to its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice15, combatting modern slavery16, opposing gender inequality17 and in freethought18. Human Rights in Paraguay are under sustained attack from Catholic lobby groups and traditionalist Christians supported by US Conservative Christians. In particular, they are succeeding in preventing women's rights, and have reversed some movements towards LGBT tolerance19.
#equality #freedom #gender_equality #human_rights #morals #paraguay #politics #prejudice #tolerance
| Compared to The Americas (2025)20 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank20 | |
| 1 | Canada | 16.7 |
| 2 | Uruguay | 31.2 |
| 3 | Costa Rica | 38.8 |
| ... | ||
| 20 | Honduras | 79.4 |
| 21 | Dominican Rep. | 79.7 |
| 22 | Colombia | 80.7 |
| 23 | Paraguay | 83.7 |
| 24 | St Vincent & Grenadines | 84.8 |
| 25 | Belize | 86.3 |
| 26 | St Lucia | 90.3 |
| 27 | Guyana | 91.5 |
| 28 | Dominica | 92.0 |
| The Americas Avg | 71.80 | |
| q=35. | ||
| Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025)20 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank20 | |
| 1 | Sweden | 7.8 |
| 2 | Netherlands | 8.7 |
| 3 | Denmark | 8.8 |
| ... | ||
| 79 | Seychelles | 82.0 |
| 80 | Thailand | 83.0 |
| 81 | Timor-Leste (E. Timor) | 83.5 |
| 82 | Paraguay | 83.7 |
| 83 | Moldova | 83.7 |
| 84 | Tuvalu | 83.8 |
| 85 | St Vincent & Grenadines | 84.8 |
| 86 | Namibia | 85.9 |
| World Avg | 89.80 | |
| q=199. | ||
The best countries in the world at ensuring human rights, fostering equality and promoting tolerance, are Sweden, The Netherlands and Denmark21. These countries are displaying the best traits that humanity has to offer. The worst countries are Somalia, Eritrea and Saudi Arabia21.
31 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on supporting press freedom, combatting modern slavery, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms, its average Freedom in the World rating, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports, its nominal commitment to Human Rights, speed of uptake of HR treaties, opposing gender inequality, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators), the year from which women could participate in democracy, its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, LGBT equality and freethought. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe21, whereas the worst are The Middle East, Africa and Asia21.
For more, see:
Amnesty International's 2023-23 summary on human rights in Paraguay stated:
“Authorities continued to criminalize social protest. Investigations into cases of torture and other ill-treatment did not make progress. Forced evictions remained a serious problem, affecting the rights of thousands of small-scale farmers and Indigenous families. Authorities failed to take action to protect LGBTI people and human rights defenders. Sexual abuse of children and girls†forced pregnancies remained serious concerns.”
"The State of the World's Human Rights 2022/23" by Amnesty International (2023)22
#democracy #freedom #Freedom_of_Speech #Good_Governance #mass_media #politics #UK
| Press Freedom Higher is better13 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 202513 | |
| 1 | Norway | 92.31 |
| 2 | Estonia | 89.46 |
| 3 | Netherlands | 88.64 |
| ... | ||
| 80 | Botswana | 57.64 |
| 81 | Zambia | 57.33 |
| 82 | Niger | 57.05 |
| 83 | Paraguay | 56.84 |
| 84 | Thailand | 56.72 |
| 85 | Bosnia & Herzegovina | 56.33 |
| 86 | Argentina | 56.14 |
| 87 | Malaysia | 56.09 |
| The Americas Avg | 55.99 | |
| World Avg | 54.65 | |
| q=179. | ||
The freedom to investigate, publish information, and have access to others' opinion is a fundamental part of today's information-driven world, and is linked with Freedom of Speech and Good Governance. Scores on the Press Freedom Index are calculated according to indicators including pluralism - the degree to which opinions are represented in the media, media independence of authorities, self-censorship, legislation, transparency and the infrastructure that supports news and information, and, the level of violence against journalists which includes lengths of imprisonments. The index "does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted". The rankings are used as one of the datasets of the Social and Moral Development Index23
It must be noted that press freedom is not an indicator of press quality and the press itself can be abusive; the UK suffers in particular from a popular brand of nasty reporting that infuses several of its newspapers who are particularly prone to running destructive and often untrue campaigns against victims. The Press Freedom Index notes that "the index should in no way be taken as an indicator of the quality of the media in the countries concerned".
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Paraguay (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Press Freedom | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|
| Paraguay: | 15.11 | 67.38 |
| World Rank: | 61st | ⇣ 101st |
| World Avg: | 27.44 | 65.91 |
#burundi #eritrea #human_rights #indonesia #slavery
| Slavery in the 2020s Lower is better16 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Total Per 100016 | |
| 1= | Switzerland | 0.50 |
| 1= | Norway | 0.50 |
| 3= | Germany | 0.60 |
| ... | ||
| 89= | Malaysia | 6.30 |
| 89= | Ethiopia | 6.30 |
| 91= | Greece | 6.40 |
| 91= | Paraguay | 6.40 |
| 93= | Sri Lanka | 6.50 |
| 93= | Gambia | 6.50 |
| 93= | Oman | 6.50 |
| 96= | Hungary | 6.60 |
| The Americas Avg | 5.84 | |
| World Avg | 7.15 | |
| q=160. | ||
Modern slavery includes forced labour (often of the under-age), debt bondage (especially generational), sexual slavery, chattel slavery and other forms of abuse, some of which can be surprisingly difficult to detect, but often target those fleeing from warzones, and the poverty-stricken vulnerable.24. Some industries (diamond, clothing, coal) from some countries (Burundi25, Eritrea25, Indonesia26) are a particular concern. The Walk Free Foundation, say in their 2023 report, that 50 million people are living in modern slavery25, and, nearly two-thirds of those in forced labour are employed at the end of supply chains working for large multinationals that creating products consumed by rich countries27.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Paraguay (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Slavery | 2010s Average | 2020s Average |
|---|---|---|
| Paraguay: | 1.60 | 6.40 |
| World Rank: | 16th | ⇣ 91st |
| World Avg: | 6.54 | 7.15 |
| Personal, Civil & Economic Freedom Lower is better12 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2014 Rank12 | |
| 1 | Hong Kong | 1 |
| 2 | Switzerland | 2 |
| 3 | New Zealand | 3 |
| ... | ||
| 74= | S. Africa | 74 |
| 74= | Papua New Guinea | 74 |
| 76 | Nicaragua | 76 |
| 77= | Paraguay | 77 |
| 77= | Mexico | 77 |
| 79= | Trinidad & Tobago | 79 |
| 79= | Bhutan | 79 |
| 79= | Benin | 79 |
| The Americas Avg | 72.4 | |
| World Avg | 79.7 | |
| q=159. | ||
The Human Freedom Index published by the Fraser Institute is...
“... a broad measure of human freedom, understood as the absence of coercive constraint. It uses 79 distinct indicators of personal and economic freedom in the following areas: Rule of Law, Security and Safety, Movement, Religion, Association, Assembly, and Civil Society, Expression, Relationships, Size of Government, Legal System and Property Rights, Access to Sound Money, Freedom to Trade Internationally, Regulation of Credit, Labor, and Business. [...]
The highest levels of freedom are in Western Europe, Northern Europe, and North America (Canada and the United States. The lowest levels are in the Middle East and North Africa, South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. [...]
Countries in the top quartile of freedom enjoy a significant higher per capita income ($37,147) [compared with] the least-free quartile [at] $8,700). The HFI finds a strong correlation between human freedom and democracy.”
"The Human Freedom Index" by The Fraser Institute (2016)28
For more, see:
#freedom #human_rights #hungary #politics #USA
| Freedom in the World Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2024 Score | |
| 1= | Norway | 1.0 |
| 1= | Canada | 1.0 |
| 1= | Cape Verde | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 85= | Bhutan | 2.5 |
| 86= | Liberia | 3.0 |
| 86= | Peru | 3.0 |
| 86= | Paraguay | 3.0 |
| 86= | Malawi | 3.0 |
| 86= | Moldova | 3.0 |
| 86= | Montenegro | 3.0 |
| 86= | Macedonia | 3.0 |
| The Americas Avg | 2.7 | |
| World Avg | 3.7 | |
| q=205. | ||
Freedom House's long-standing annual report has been running since the 1970s, collecting data on political rights (PR) and civil liberties (CL). Their reports rate countries as "Free", "Partially Free" or "Not Free", however the results here are based on their numerical values. Many countries score the best combination of scores (1 and 1), which is why the table of results show many places equally placed in 1st place. In the past two decades, some well-established democracies like the USA and Hungary have been falling. Whilst most of the world in general is improving rights and freedoms over time, the 2020s has seen some regression.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Paraguay (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Freedom in the World | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paraguay: | 5.1 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 |
| World Rank: | 95th | ⇡ 92nd | ⇣ 93rd | ⇣ 99th | ⇡ 95th |
| World Avg: | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| Human Rights Watch Comments Higher is better10 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2017 Score10 | |
| 1= | UK | 9 |
| 1= | France | 9 |
| 1= | Germany | 9 |
| ... | ||
| 33= | Gambia | 2 |
| 33= | Liechtenstein | 2 |
| 33= | Chile | 2 |
| 36= | Paraguay | 1 |
| 36= | Costa Rica | 1 |
| 36= | Norway | 1 |
| 36= | Panama | 1 |
| 40= | Ukraine | 0 |
| The Americas Avg | -0.8 | |
| World Avg | -1.9 | |
| q=123. | ||
Human Rights Watch comments concentrate mostly on negative issues, however, they also make positive comments for those countries that engage in human rights defence around the world, or who make improvements at home. By adding up positive and negative comments (including double-points for negatives that involve large scales and crimes against humanity), the Social and Moral Index turns HRW commentary into quantified values. Some countries may be unfairly penalized because HRW have not examined them, and, some countries "get away" with abuses if they manage to hide it, or if it goes unnoticed - a negative point has been given for those countries in which HRW specifically state that access to investigators has been barred. The points were limited to a minimum of -10 because there are some points at which things are so bad, with abuses affecting so many, it is difficult to be more specific about the depths of the issues.
For more, see:
| Nominal Commitment to HR Higher is better9 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2009 Treaties9 | |
| 1 | Argentina | 24 |
| 2= | Chile | 23 |
| 2= | Costa Rica | 23 |
| ... | ||
| 5= | Peru | 23 |
| 5= | Spain | 23 |
| 5= | Slovenia | 23 |
| 5= | Paraguay | 23 |
| 5= | Serbia | 23 |
| 5= | Sweden | 23 |
| 5= | Uruguay | 23 |
| 14= | Italy | 22 |
| The Americas Avg | 16.5 | |
| World Avg | 15.1 | |
| q=194. | ||
There are many international agreements on human rights, and, many mechanisms by which countries can be brought to account for their actions. Together, these have been the biggest historical movement in the fight against oppression and inhumanity. Or, putting it another way: these are rejected mostly by those who wish to oppress inhumanely. None of them are perfect and many people object to various components and wordings, but, no-one has come up with, and enforced, better methods of controlling the occasional desires that states and peoples have of causing angst for other states and peoples in a violent, unjust or inhumane way. Points are awarded for the number of human rights agreements ratified by the country, plus the acceptance of the petition mechanisms for disputes. The maximum possible score in 2009 was 24.
For more, see:
#human_rights #international_law #micronesia #politics #small_islands
| HR Treaties Lag Lower is better29 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2019 Avg Yrs/Treaty29 | |
| 1 | Ecuador | 2.15 |
| 2 | Uruguay | 2.25 |
| 3 | Tunisia | 3.65 |
| ... | ||
| 69 | Greece | 8.44 |
| 70 | Kenya | 8.58 |
| 71 | Eritrea | 8.66 |
| 72= | Paraguay | 8.78 |
| 72= | Burkina Faso | 8.78 |
| 74 | Belize | 8.88 |
| 75 | Yemen | 8.88 |
| 76 | Japan | 9.16 |
| The Americas Avg | 8.45 | |
| World Avg | 10.02 | |
| q=195. | ||
Human Rights (HR) Treaties Lag is a count of how long it took each country to sign each of 11 key HR treaties. From the date of the first signatory of each treaty, all other countries have one point added to their score for each day they delayed in signing. Results are presented as average time in years to sign each one. The lower a country's score, the more enthusiastically it has taken on international Human Rights Treaties - which are, of course, minimal standards of good governance. The slowest are the countries of Micronesia, Melanesia, Australasia and Polynesia all lagged by over 12 years per treaty. The best regions are The Americas, Scandinavia and the Mediterranean.
For more, see:
Paraguay has made some steps towards ending gender inequality but much more needs to be done.
Abortion is too limited and only legal if pregnancy threatens the life of the mother19. Many cities are even more restricted than required, with church representatives standing with celebrants each time a city declares its "pro-life" stance in the name of traditional family values19.
See:
#gender #gender_equality #human_rights #misogyny #women
| Gender Inequality Lower is better17 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 202217 | |
| 1 | Denmark | 0.01 |
| 2 | Norway | 0.01 |
| 3 | Switzerland | 0.02 |
| ... | ||
| 103 | Guyana | 0.42 |
| 104 | Samoa | 0.42 |
| 105 | Bolivia | 0.42 |
| 106 | Paraguay | 0.43 |
| 107 | Dominican Rep. | 0.44 |
| 108 | Algeria | 0.44 |
| 109 | Morocco | 0.44 |
| 110 | Indonesia | 0.44 |
| The Americas Avg | 0.36 | |
| World Avg | 0.34 | |
| q=166. | ||
The UN Human Development Reports include statistics on gender equality which take into account things like maternal mortality, access to political power (seats in parliament) and differences between male and female education rates. Gender inequality is not a necessary part of early human development. Although a separation of roles is almost universal due to different strengths between the genders, this does not have to mean that women are subdued, and, such patriarchalism is not universal in ancient history. Those cultures and peoples who shed, or never developed, the idea that mankind ought to dominate womankind, are better cultures and peoples than those who, even today, cling violently to those mores.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Paraguay (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Gender Inequality | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paraguay: | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.45 |
| World Rank: | 83rd | ⇣ 98th | ⇣ 105th |
| World Avg: | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.37 |
#christianity #gender_equality #human_rights #politics #women
| Year Women Can Vote Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Total Year | |
| 1 | New Zealand | 1893 |
| 2 | Australia | 1902 |
| 3 | Finland | 1906 |
| ... | ||
| 130= | Mauritania | 1961 |
| 130= | Burundi | 1961 |
| 130= | Malawi | 1961 |
| 130= | Paraguay | 1961 |
| 130= | Sierra Leone | 1961 |
| 135= | Zambia | 1962 |
| 135= | Uganda | 1962 |
| 135= | Monaco | 1962 |
| The Americas Avg | 1947 | |
| World Avg | 1930 | |
| q=189. | ||
Women now have equal rights in the vast majority of countries across the world. Although academic literature oftens talks of when a country "grants women the right to vote", this enforces a backwards way of thinking. Women always had the right to vote, however, they were frequently denied that right. The opposition to women's ability to vote in equality with man was most consistently and powerfully opposed by the Catholic Church, other Christian organisations, Islamic authorities and some other religious and secular traditionalists.
For more, see:
#antisemitism #christianity #germany #indonesia #jordan #judaism #laos #morocco #netherlands #pakistan #philippines #religion #religious_violence #saudi_arabia #spain #sweden #turkey #UK #vietnam
| Anti-Semite Opinions Lower is better15 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2014 %15 | |
| 1 | Laos | 0 |
| 2 | Philippines | 3 |
| 3 | Sweden | 4 |
| ... | ||
| 57 | Nicaragua | 34 |
| 58= | Romania | 35 |
| 58= | Cameroon | 35 |
| 58= | Paraguay | 35 |
| 58= | Kenya | 35 |
| 62= | Lithuania | 36 |
| 62= | Guatemala | 36 |
| 64= | France | 37 |
| The Americas Avg | 29.7 | |
| World Avg | 36.8 | |
| q=101. | ||
Anti-Semitism is the word given to irrational racism against Jews. It's not the same as anti-Judaism (arguments against the religion) nor the same as anti-Zionism (arguments against Israel). In history, influential Christian theologians concocted the arguments against Jews that led, very early on, to widespread Christian action against Jews30,31,32,33. As Christianity rose to power in the West and presided over the Dark Ages, there were repeated violent outbursts against Jews of the most horrible kind. Entire Crusades were aimed at them and the feared Spanish Inquisition paid Jews particular attention. The horror of the holocaust instigated by German Nazis in the 1940s was followed (finally) by the era of European human rights and a movement against racism in general.
The places that are the least anti-Semitical are a few countries of south-east Asia (Laos, the Philippines and Vietnam) and some of the secular liberal democracies of Europe (Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK). The worst countries for antisemitism are Islamic states of the Middle East34, which are undergoing their own Dark Age. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Morocco, Indonesia, Pakistan and Turkey see the most oppressive and violent actions towards Jews35,36. Jews in Muslim countries face a host of restrictions and "ceaseless humiliation and regular pogroms"37. In 2004 the European Union Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia reported on violent anti-Jew crimes in the EU and found that that largest group of perpetrators were young Muslim males38.
For more, see:
#equality #homosexuality #human_rights #ICCPR #intolerance #sexuality #tolerance
| LGBT Equality in the 2020s Higher is better11 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Total Score11 | |
| 1= | Germany | 4.88 |
| 1= | Spain | 4.88 |
| 3 | Portugal | 4.81 |
| ... | ||
| 72= | Lesotho | 0.89 |
| 72= | Seychelles | 0.89 |
| 74 | Botswana | 0.88 |
| 75 | Paraguay | 0.84 |
| 76 | Angola | 0.83 |
| 77 | Sao Tome & Principe | 0.81 |
| 78= | Micronesia | 0.80 |
| 78= | El Salvador | 0.80 |
| The Americas Avg | 0.41 | |
| World Avg | -1.21 | |
| q=215. | ||
Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) folk is rife across the world. Legal restrictions co-exist alongside social stigmatisation and physical violence39. LGBT tolerance and equal rights have been fought for country-by-country against tightly entrenched cultural and religious opposition. Adult consensual sexual activity is a Human Right and protected by privacy laws40. Despite this, it is illegal to be homosexual in over 60 countries (as of 2025)41. The Vexen LGBT Equality Index as part of the Social and Moral Development Index grants points to each country depending on its LGBT stance since the 1970s42,43. Europe is by far the least prejudiced region, but in the Middle East and Africa cultural prejudice goes hand-in-hand with state intolerance, all too often including physical violence.
For more, see:
LGBT tolerance in is going backwards. Same-sex marriage remains illegal, the awful practice of 'conversion therapy' is too common. LGBT events face violence, including murder. There is no generic law prohibiting prejudice and discrimination.19
“In 2017, Paraguay became the first country in the world to ban gender issues from school lessons due to the support of conservative Christian groups based in the US, such as Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). At the time of the ban, the then Minister for Education swore he would burn any books that contained so-called "gender ideology."”
"The Freedom of Thought Report" by Humanists International (2021)19
A few years later, things had not improved, with homophobic paranoia ignited by religious fervour proving an immovable obstacle to progress..
In Paraguay historically, LGBT folk faced severe persecution, especially under the dictatorship of Alfredo Stroessner (1954-1989), most infamously during a mass arrest of 108 people in 1959, who were suspected of being homosexual, and were tortured. Thankfully, Paraguay began to modernize, and homosexuality has been legal since 1990, although the age of consent remains unequal and sameā€`sex marriage and civil unions are constitutionally banned, adoption rights are denied, and ILGA researchers in 2017 found that Paraguay still had no legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination.“In December 2020, a draft National Plan for Childhood and Adolescence 2020-2024 - which sought to address sexual abuse, issues of violence, and the need for comprehensive sexuality education - was withdrawn for redrafting following statements made by members of the Catholic Church that argued that the Plan would promote the destruction of conservative family values.
It appears that groups opposed to the Plan particularly objected to the proposals around sex education, the teaching of sexuality with a gender lens, and issues surrounding sexual reproductive health. Conservative opponents appeared concerned that the use of the term "gender" was a means to introduce the "LGBTI+ agenda."”
"The Freedom of Thought Report" by Humanists International (2021)19
Actions taken at the United Nations:
Averages by decade for Paraguay (for the ranks, lower is better):
| LGBT Equality | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average | 2020s Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paraguay: | -5.00 | -5.00 | -0.40 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.84 |
| World Rank: | 136th | ⇣ 138th | ⇡ 67th | ⇡ 61st | ⇣ 80th | ⇡ 75th |
| World Avg: | -2.98 | -2.87 | -2.60 | -2.15 | -1.10 | -1.21 |
#europe #freedom_of_belief #freethought #human_rights #netherlands #Paraguay #religion #religion_in_Paraguay #religious_tolerance #secularism #the_enlightenment
Although Paraguay's constitution states that "the State is independent of religion"44, the Catholic Church is also named as a cooperative partner in Articles 24 and 8919. Conservative Catholics have great influence over politics to the extent that they damage democracy and human rights, especially women's rights and LGBT tolerance. With support of US Christian organisations, they managed ban the teaching of tolerance in schools, with the Minister for Education swearing that he would "burn any books that contained so-called gender ideology"19.
| Freedom of Thought Lower is better18 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 202118 | |
| 1= | Belgium | 1.0 |
| 1= | Taiwan | 1.0 |
| 1= | Netherlands | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 107= | Finland | 3.0 |
| 107= | Panama | 3.0 |
| 109= | Philippines | 3.3 |
| 109= | Paraguay | 3.3 |
| 109= | Singapore | 3.3 |
| 109= | Vanuatu | 3.3 |
| 109= | Tajikistan | 3.3 |
| 109= | Zambia | 3.3 |
| The Americas Avg | 2.7 | |
| World Avg | 3.0 | |
| q=196. | ||
Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Belief are upheld in Article 18 the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights45. It affirms that it is a basic human right that all people are free to change their beliefs and religion as they wish46. No countries voted against this (although eight abstained). This right was first recognized clearly in the policies of religious toleration of the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe in the post-enlightenment era47 of the 19th century. In democratic countries, freedom of belief and religion is now taken for granted48. In 2016 a study found that over 180 countries in the world had come to guarantee freedom of religion and belief49. The best countries at doing so are Belgium, The Netherlands and Taiwan18,50 and the worst: Afghanistan, N. Korea, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia18,51.
Long-term studies have shown that religious violence and persecution both decrease in cultures where religious freedom is guaranteed52. Despite this, there still are many who are strongly against freedom of belief46, including entire cultures and many individual communities of religious believers. Their alternative is that you are not free to believe what you want and they often state that you cannot change religion without being punished (often including the death penalty): this is bemoaned as one of the most dangerous elements of religion53 and "the denial of religious freedoms is inevitably intertwined with the denial of other freedoms"54 and the solution is, everywhere, to allow religious freedom and the freedom of belief.
For more, see:
The concept of Christian family values - often called simply traditional family values, is preventing the government, and society, from properly tackling a culture that has a dark side. Even where cases of abuse are clear-cut, in a country that doesn't take liberalism seriously, power and influence can grant effective immunity.
“In 2020, a court in San Lorenzo de Limpio dismissed charges against a Catholic priest accused of sexual harassment despite clear evidence, including his confession, to having groped her. The judges argued that for harassment to be proven there would have to be evidence that the priest was in a position of power over the Church´s Coordinator of its Youth Ministry, and that it was not just a one-off occurrence. The woman in question took the case to court after the archdiocese failed to investigate, instead emphasizing that the dignity of the priest must be safeguarded. In December, an appeals court overturned the ruling and ordered a new trial.”
"The Freedom of Thought Report" by Humanists International (2021)19
Walking alongside is an even darker spectre:
“Cases of sexual abuse and exploitation of children are reportedly prevalent in Paraguay.
In December 2020, a draft National Plan for Childhood and Adolescence 2020-2024 - which sought to address sexual abuse, issues of violence, and the need for comprehensive sexuality education - was withdrawn for redrafting following statements made by members of the Catholic Church that argued that the Plan would promote the destruction of conservative family values.
It appears that groups opposed to the Plan particularly objected to the proposals around sex education, the teaching of sexuality with a gender lens, and issues surrounding sexual reproductive health. Conservative opponents appeared concerned that the use of the term "gender" was a means to introduce the "LGBTI+ agenda."”
"The Freedom of Thought Report" by Humanists International (2021)19