https://www.humantruth.info/mozambique_human_rights_and_freedom.html
By Vexen Crabtree 2019
#freethought #mozambique #mozambique_freethought #religious_tolerance
| Mozambique Republic of Mozambique [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
|---|---|
| Status | Independent State |
| Social and Moral Index | 186th best |
| Location | Africa |
| Population | 29.5m1 |
| Life Expectancy | 59.32yrs (2017)2 |
Mozambique does relatively well in ensuring human rights and freedom, compared to many other countries. Mozambique comes in the best 20 when it comes to freethought3. It does better than average in terms of combatting modern slavery4 and in commentary in Human Rights Watch reports5. Mozambique still has work to do. Mozambique does worse than average in terms of supporting press freedom6, its nominal commitment to Human Rights7, LGBT equality in the 2020s8, opposing gender inequality9 (still low for Africa) and in its average Freedom in the World rating (still good for Africa). Government and rebel (now reformed into a political party, RENAMO) both continued to commit violent abuses with impunity and major crimes and murders are often not investigated at all10. Progress is always going to be difficult in a country where the richest 10% hold 46% of the country's entire income11.
#dangerous_beliefs #equality #freedom #gender_equality #human_rights #morals #mozambique #politics #prejudice #tolerance
| Compared to Africa (2025)12 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank12 | |
| 1 | Cape Verde | 65.1 |
| 2 | S. Africa | 70.5 |
| 3 | Mauritius | 76.4 |
| ... | ||
| 12 | Gabon | 101.8 |
| 13 | Mali | 102.1 |
| 14 | Rwanda | 103.1 |
| 15 | Mozambique | 104.8 |
| 16 | Tunisia | 104.9 |
| 17 | Sierra Leone | 105.2 |
| 18 | Central African Rep. | 107.0 |
| 19 | Benin | 109.8 |
| 20 | Ivory Coast | 110.4 |
| Africa Avg | 116.60 | |
| q=54. | ||
| Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025)12 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank12 | |
| 1 | Sweden | 7.5 |
| 2 | Netherlands | 8.6 |
| 3 | Denmark | 9.0 |
| ... | ||
| 119 | Haiti | 104.1 |
| 120 | Russia | 104.6 |
| 121 | Sri Lanka | 104.8 |
| 122 | Mozambique | 104.8 |
| 123 | Tunisia | 104.9 |
| 124 | India | 105.1 |
| 125 | Sierra Leone | 105.2 |
| 126 | Cuba | 106.0 |
| World Avg | 90.04 | |
| q=198. | ||
The best countries in the world at ensuring human rights, fostering equality and promoting tolerance, are Sweden, The Netherlands and Denmark13. These countries are displaying the best traits that humanity has to offer. The worst countries are Somalia, Eritrea and Saudi Arabia13.
30 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on supporting press freedom, combatting modern slavery, its average Freedom in the World rating, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports, its nominal commitment to Human Rights, speed of uptake of HR treaties, opposing gender inequality, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators), the year from which women could participate in democracy, its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, LGBT equality and freethought. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe13, whereas the worst are The Middle East, Africa and Asia13.
For more, see:
Amnesty International's 2023-23 summary on human rights in Mozambique stated:
“Armed conflict-driven human rights violations continued in northern Mozambique, aggravating the humanitarian crisis. Armed groups continued to burn villages, behead people and abduct women and girls. Meanwhile government security forces operating in the area also committed human rights violations against the population, including enforced disappearances, harassment and intimidation of civilians, and extortion of payments from traders. Internally displaced people continued to live in deplorable conditions with little access to food, water and housing. The rights to peaceful assembly and expression were repressed. A new NGO law threatened to limit civic space if implemented.”
"The State of the World's Human Rights 2022/23" by Amnesty International (2023)14
“The killings, kidnappings, and physical attacks against people [including children] with albinism continued, despite government efforts to stop the violence, including several arrests. In Mozambique and some neighboring countries, people with albinism are hunted for their body parts, which are used for witchcraft.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)10
#democracy #freedom #Freedom_of_Speech #Good_Governance #mass_media #politics #UK
| Press Freedom Higher is better6 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20256 | |
| 1 | Norway | 92.31 |
| 2 | Estonia | 89.46 |
| 3 | Netherlands | 88.64 |
| ... | ||
| 97 | Swaziland | 52.86 |
| 98 | Kosovo | 52.73 |
| 99 | Angola | 52.67 |
| 100 | Mozambique | 52.63 |
| 101 | Mongolia | 52.57 |
| 102 | Guinea | 52.53 |
| 103 | Maldives | 52.46 |
| 104 | Burkina Faso | 52.25 |
| Africa Avg | 52.30 | |
| World Avg | 54.65 | |
| q=179. Also scored for 2000s-2010s. | ||
The freedom to investigate, publish information, and have access to others' opinion is a fundamental part of today's information-driven world, and is linked with Freedom of Speech and Good Governance. Scores on the Press Freedom Index are calculated according to indicators including pluralism - the degree to which opinions are represented in the media, media independence of authorities, self-censorship, legislation, transparency and the infrastructure that supports news and information, and, the level of violence against journalists which includes lengths of imprisonments. The index "does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted". The rankings are used as one of the datasets of the Social and Moral Development Index15
It must be noted that press freedom is not an indicator of press quality and the press itself can be abusive; the UK suffers in particular from a popular brand of nasty reporting that infuses several of its newspapers who are particularly prone to running destructive and often untrue campaigns against victims. The Press Freedom Index notes that "the index should in no way be taken as an indicator of the quality of the media in the countries concerned".
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Mozambique (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Press Freedom | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|
| Mozambique: | 17.28 | 69.67 |
| World Rank: | 72nd | ⇣ 87th |
| World Avg: | 27.44 | 65.91 |
#burundi #eritrea #human_rights #indonesia #slavery
| Slavery in the 2020s Lower is better4 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Slavery in the 2020s Per 10004 | |
| 1= | Switzerland | 0.50 |
| 1= | Norway | 0.50 |
| 3= | Germany | 0.60 |
| ... | ||
| 31= | Senegal | 2.90 |
| 31= | Ghana | 2.90 |
| 33= | Benin | 3.00 |
| 33= | Mozambique | 3.00 |
| 35 | Liberia | 3.10 |
| 36= | Chile | 3.20 |
| 36= | Costa Rica | 3.20 |
| 38= | Nepal | 3.30 |
| Africa Avg | 6.90 | |
| World Avg | 7.15 | |
| q=160. Also scored for 2010s-2020s. | ||
Modern slavery includes forced labour (often of the under-age), debt bondage (especially generational), sexual slavery, chattel slavery and other forms of abuse, some of which can be surprisingly difficult to detect, but often target those fleeing from warzones, and the poverty-stricken vulnerable.16. Some industries (diamond, clothing, coal) from some countries (Burundi17, Eritrea17, Indonesia18) are a particular concern. The Walk Free Foundation, say in their 2023 report, that 50 million people are living in modern slavery17, and, nearly two-thirds of those in forced labour are employed at the end of supply chains working for large multinationals that creating products consumed by rich countries19.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Mozambique (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Slavery | 2010s Average | 2020s Average |
|---|---|---|
| Mozambique: | 5.40 | 3.00 |
| World Rank: | 101st | ⇡ 33rd |
| World Avg: | 6.54 | 7.15 |
#freedom #human_rights #hungary #politics #USA
| Freedom in the World Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2024 Score | |
| 1= | Norway | 1.0 |
| 1= | Canada | 1.0 |
| 1= | Cape Verde | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 128= | Guinea-Bissau | 4.5 |
| 128= | Maldives | 4.5 |
| 128= | Lebanon | 4.5 |
| 128= | Mozambique | 4.5 |
| 132= | Morocco | 5.0 |
| 132= | Mauritania | 5.0 |
| 132= | Jordan | 5.0 |
| 132= | Pakistan | 5.0 |
| Africa Avg | 4.8 | |
| World Avg | 3.7 | |
| q=205. Also scored for 1970s-2010s. | ||
Freedom House's long-standing annual report has been running since the 1970s, collecting data on political rights (PR) and civil liberties (CL). Their reports rate countries as "Free", "Partially Free" or "Not Free", however the results here are based on their numerical values. Many countries score the best combination of scores (1 and 1), which is why the table of results show many places equally placed in 1st place. In the past two decades, some well-established democracies like the USA and Hungary have been falling. Whilst most of the world in general is improving rights and freedoms over time, the 2020s has seen some regression.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Mozambique (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Freedom in the World | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mozambique: | 6.8 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 3.8 |
| World Rank: | 154th | ⇡ 149th | ⇡ 121st | ⇡ 104th | ⇣ 117th |
| World Avg: | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| Human Rights Watch Comments Higher is better5 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2017 Score5 | |
| 1= | UK | 9 |
| 1= | France | 9 |
| 1= | Germany | 9 |
| ... | ||
| 46= | Kosovo | -1 |
| 46= | Honduras | -1 |
| 46= | Peru | -1 |
| 49= | Mozambique | -2 |
| 49= | Brazil | -2 |
| 49= | Argentina | -2 |
| 49= | Georgia | -2 |
| 49= | Turkey | -2 |
| Africa Avg | -5.6 | |
| World Avg | -1.9 | |
| q=123. | ||
Human Rights Watch comments concentrate mostly on negative issues, however, they also make positive comments for those countries that engage in human rights defence around the world, or who make improvements at home. By adding up positive and negative comments (including double-points for negatives that involve large scales and crimes against humanity), the Social and Moral Index turns HRW commentary into quantified values. Some countries may be unfairly penalized because HRW have not examined them, and, some countries "get away" with abuses if they manage to hide it, or if it goes unnoticed - a negative point has been given for those countries in which HRW specifically state that access to investigators has been barred. The points were limited to a minimum of -10 because there are some points at which things are so bad, with abuses affecting so many, it is difficult to be more specific about the depths of the issues.
For more, see:
| Nominal Commitment to HR Higher is better7 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2009 Treaties7 | |
| 1 | Argentina | 24 |
| 2= | Chile | 23 |
| 2= | Costa Rica | 23 |
| ... | ||
| 108= | Andorra | 15 |
| 108= | Cape Verde | 15 |
| 108= | Bangladesh | 15 |
| 108= | Mozambique | 15 |
| 112= | Dominican Rep. | 14 |
| 112= | Kenya | 14 |
| 112= | Japan | 14 |
| 112= | Jamaica | 14 |
| Africa Avg | 14.8 | |
| World Avg | 15.1 | |
| q=194. | ||
There are many international agreements on Human Rights, and, many mechanisms by which countries can be brought to account for their actions. Together, these have been the biggest historical movement in the fight against oppression and inhumanity. Or, putting it another way: these are rejected mostly by those who wish to oppress inhumanely. None of them are perfect and many people object to various components and wordings, but, no-one has come up with, and enforced, better methods of controlling the occasional desires that states and peoples have of causing angst for other states and peoples in a violent, unjust or inhumane way. Points are awarded for the number of Human Rights agreements ratified by the country, plus the acceptance of the petition mechanisms for disputes. The maximum possible score in 2009 was 24.
For more, see:
#human_rights #international_law #micronesia #politics #small_islands
| HR Treaties Lag Lower is better20 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2019 Avg Yrs/Treaty20 | |
| 1 | Ecuador | 2.15 |
| 2 | Uruguay | 2.25 |
| 3 | Tunisia | 3.65 |
| ... | ||
| 107 | Israel | 10.97 |
| 108 | Armenia | 11.00 |
| 109 | Lithuania | 11.03 |
| 110 | Mozambique | 11.04 |
| 111 | Tajikistan | 11.08 |
| 112 | Ethiopia | 11.13 |
| 113 | Slovenia | 11.13 |
| 114 | Dominica | 11.14 |
| Africa Avg | 9.88 | |
| World Avg | 10.02 | |
| q=195. | ||
Human Rights (HR) Treaties Lag is a count of how long it took each country to sign each of 11 key HR treaties. From the date of the first signatory of each treaty, all other countries have one point added to their score for each day they delayed in signing. Results are presented as average time in years to sign each one. The lower a country's score, the more enthusiastically it has taken on international Human Rights Treaties - which are, of course, minimal standards of good governance. The slowest are the countries of Micronesia, Melanesia, Australasia and Polynesia all lagged by over 12 years per treaty. The best regions are The Americas, Scandinavia and the Mediterranean.
For more, see:
Mozambique is an unequal country, with male rights dominating those of women.
See:
#gender #gender_equality #human_rights #misogyny #women
| Gender Inequality Lower is better9 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20229 | |
| 1 | Denmark | 0.01 |
| 2 | Norway | 0.01 |
| 3 | Switzerland | 0.02 |
| ... | ||
| 115 | Laos | 0.46 |
| 116 | Myanmar | 0.48 |
| 117 | Guatemala | 0.48 |
| 118 | Mozambique | 0.48 |
| 119 | Botswana | 0.49 |
| 120 | Iran | 0.49 |
| 121 | Cambodia | 0.49 |
| 122 | Syria | 0.49 |
| Africa Avg | 0.53 | |
| World Avg | 0.34 | |
| q=166. Also scored for 1990s-2010s. | ||
The UN Human Development Reports include statistics on gender equality which take into account things like maternal mortality, access to political power (seats in parliament) and differences between male and female education rates. Gender inequality is not a necessary part of early human development. Although a separation of roles is almost universal due to different strengths between the genders, this does not have to mean that women are subdued, and, such patriarchalism is not universal in ancient history. Those cultures and peoples who shed, or never developed, the idea that mankind ought to dominate womankind, are better cultures and peoples than those who, even today, cling violently to those mores.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Mozambique (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Gender Inequality | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mozambique: | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.52 |
| World Rank: | 87th | ⇣ 109th | ⇣ 124th |
| World Avg: | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.37 |
#christianity #gender_equality #human_rights #politics #women
| Year Women Can Vote Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Year Women Can Vote Year | |
| 1 | New Zealand | 1893 |
| 2 | Australia | 1902 |
| 3 | Finland | 1906 |
| ... | ||
| 166= | Sao Tome & Principe | 1975 |
| 166= | Cape Verde | 1975 |
| 166= | Angola | 1975 |
| 166= | Mozambique | 1975 |
| 170 | Portugal | 1976 |
| 171 | Guinea-Bissau | 1977 |
| 172 | Zimbabwe | 1978 |
| 173= | Marshall Islands | 1979 |
| Africa Avg | 1961 | |
| World Avg | 1930 | |
| q=189. | ||
Women now have equal rights in the vast majority of countries across the world. Although academic literature oftens talks of when a country "grants women the right to vote", this enforces a backwards way of thinking. Women always had the right to vote, however, they were frequently denied that right. The opposition to women's ability to vote in equality with man was most consistently and powerfully opposed by the Catholic Church, other Christian organisations, Islamic authorities and some other religious and secular traditionalists.
For more, see:
#2020s #equality #homosexuality #human_rights #ICCPR #intolerance #sexuality #tolerance
“Two years since the decriminalization of homosexuality in Mozambique, the government had still not registered the country´s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) group, Lambda. Since January 2016, the government has not made a public statement about Lambda or the rights of homosexuals in the country, despite constant appeals by the UN Human Rights Council for the government to register nongovernmental organizations that work on issues of sexual orientation and gender identity. Homosexuality is widely tolerated in Mozambique, but LGBT people and local activists point to frequent discrimination at work and mistreatment by family members.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)10
| LGBT Equality in the 2020s Higher is better8 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | LGBT Equality in the 2020s Score8 | |
| 1= | Germany | 4.88 |
| 1= | Spain | 4.88 |
| 3 | Portugal | 4.81 |
| ... | ||
| 108 | Mongolia | -0.48 |
| 109 | Hungary | -0.50 |
| 110 | Honduras | -0.51 |
| 111 | Mozambique | -0.55 |
| 112 | Vanuatu | -0.61 |
| 113 | Dominican Rep. | -0.63 |
| 114 | Palau | -0.65 |
| 115 | Congo, (Brazzaville) | -0.68 |
| Africa Avg | -3.78 | |
| World Avg | -1.21 | |
| q=215. Also scored for 1970s-2020s. | ||
Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) folk is rife across the world. Legal restrictions co-exist alongside social stigmatisation and physical violence21. LGBT tolerance and equal rights have been fought for country-by-country against tightly entrenched cultural and religious opposition. Adult consensual sexual activity is a Human Right and protected by privacy laws22. Despite this, it is illegal to be homosexual in over 60 countries (as of 2025)23. The Vexen LGBT Equality Index as part of the Social and Moral Development Index grants points to each country depending on its LGBT stance since the 1970s24,25. Europe is by far the least prejudiced region, but in the Middle East and Africa cultural prejudice goes hand-in-hand with state intolerance, all too often including physical violence.
For more, see:
Homosexuality in Mozambique has been legal since 2015, when the new Penal Code replaced colonial-era "acts against nature" law imposed by Portugal from 1886 (though prosecutions were rare). When same-sex marriage began to be tolerated throughout the world, Mozambique reacted homophobically with a new Family Law that specifically defined same-sex marriage as between "a man and a woman". But things got better; a few years before decriminalisation in 2015, Mozambique’s Justice Minister declared homosexuality "not an offence" (2011). ILGA researchers in 2017 found that Mozambique still had almost no legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination (except in employment), and supportive NGOs are banned. Progress was made with the Penal Code of 2020 (Law 24/2019) that introduced explicit protections against hate crimes and hate speech targeting LGBT folk. At the end of 2025, same-sex marriage and adoption remained banned, but Mozambique has introduced some protections against hate crimes and discrimination.Actions taken at the United Nations:
Averages by decade for Mozambique (for the ranks, lower is better):
| LGBT Equality | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average | 2020s Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mozambique: | -3.00 | -3.00 | -3.00 | -6.60 | -2.20 | -0.55 |
| World Rank: | 79th | ⇣ 85th | ⇣ 107th | ⇣ 174th | ⇡ 129th | ⇡ 111th |
| World Avg: | -2.98 | -2.87 | -2.60 | -2.15 | -1.10 | -1.21 |
#europe #freedom_of_belief #freethought #human_rights #netherlands #religion #religious_tolerance #secularism #the_enlightenment
| Freedom of Thought Lower is better3 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20213 | |
| 1= | Belgium | 1.0 |
| 1= | Taiwan | 1.0 |
| 1= | Netherlands | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 15= | S. Africa | 1.7 |
| 16= | St Kitts & Nevis | 1.8 |
| 16= | Namibia | 1.8 |
| 16= | Mozambique | 1.8 |
| 16= | Micronesia | 1.8 |
| 16= | USA | 1.8 |
| 16= | Slovenia | 1.8 |
| 16= | Palau | 1.8 |
| Africa Avg | 3.1 | |
| World Avg | 3.0 | |
| q=196. | ||
Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Belief are upheld in Article 18 the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights26. It affirms that it is a basic human right that all people are free to change their beliefs and religion as they wish27. No countries voted against this (although eight abstained). This right was first recognized clearly in the policies of religious toleration of the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe in the post-enlightenment era28 of the 19th century. In democratic countries, freedom of belief and religion is now taken for granted29. In 2016 a study found that over 180 countries in the world had come to guarantee freedom of religion and belief30. The best countries at doing so are Belgium, The Netherlands and Taiwan3,31 and the worst: Afghanistan, N. Korea, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia3,32.
Long-term studies have shown that religious violence and persecution both decrease in cultures where religious freedom is guaranteed33. Despite this, there still are many who are strongly against freedom of belief27, including entire cultures and many individual communities of religious believers. Their alternative is that you are not free to believe what you want and they often state that you cannot change religion without being punished (often including the death penalty): this is bemoaned as one of the most dangerous elements of religion34 and "the denial of religious freedoms is inevitably intertwined with the denial of other freedoms"35 and the solution is, everywhere, to allow religious freedom and the freedom of belief.
For more, see: