https://www.humantruth.info/tajikistan_human_rights_and_freedom.html
By Vexen Crabtree 2019
Tajikistan Republic of Tajikistan [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
---|---|
Status | Independent State |
Social and Moral Index | 131st best |
Location | Asia |
Population | 9.1m1 |
Life Expectancy | 71.59yrs (2017)2 |
Tajikistan is very poor at ensuring human rights and freedom compared to the rest of the world, and it has cultural issues when it comes to tolerance and equality. Tajikistan does better than average in opposing gender inequality3 and in its nominal commitment to Human Rights4. But that's it. Tajikistan has problems. It does worse than average in commentary in Human Rights Watch reports5, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms6 (still low for Asia), eliminating modern slavery7, LGBT equality8, freethought9 (still good for Asia) and in supporting press freedom10. It falls into the worst-performing 20 in terms of its average Freedom in the World rating (amongst the worst in Asia). And finally, it is the worst in the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators)11. Persecution of critics and opposition politicians continues12 and human rights defenders are harassed - 7 human rights lawyers have been arrested or imprisoned since 201412.
#equality #freedom #gender_equality #human_rights #morals #politics #prejudice #tajikistan #tolerance
Compared to Asia (2025)13 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank13 | |
1 | Taiwan | 23.7 |
2 | Japan | 38.8 |
3 | Cyprus | 42.8 |
... | ||
17 | Sri Lanka | 95.3 |
18 | Timor-Leste (E. Timor) | 95.8 |
19= | India | 96.0 |
20 | Tajikistan | 96.5 |
21 | Thailand | 96.8 |
22 | China | 98.2 |
23 | Vietnam | 98.9 |
24 | Lebanon | 100.6 |
25 | Kazakhstan | 102.8 |
Asia Avg | 103.0 | |
q=52. |
Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025)13 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank13 | |
1 | Sweden | 8.5 |
2 | Denmark | 13.5 |
3 | Norway | 13.5 |
... | ||
105= | India | 96.0 |
105= | Antigua & Barbuda | 96.0 |
107 | Benin | 96.1 |
108 | Tajikistan | 96.5 |
109 | Thailand | 96.8 |
110 | Bahamas | 97.1 |
111 | Mozambique | 97.5 |
112 | Guyana | 97.5 |
World Avg | 87.8 | |
q=200. |
The best countries in the world at ensuring human rights, fostering equality and promoting tolerance, are Sweden, Denmark and Norway14. These countries are displaying the best traits that humanity has to offer. The worst countries are Somalia, The Vatican City and Sudan14.
The data sets used to calculate points for each country are statistics on supporting press freedom, eliminating modern slavery, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms, its average Freedom in the World rating, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports, its nominal commitment to Human Rights, speed of uptake of HR treaties, opposing gender inequality, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators), the year from which women could participate in democracy, its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, LGBT equality and freethought. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe14, whereas the worst are Melanesia, The Middle East and Micronesia14.
For more, see:
Amnesty International's 2023-23 summary on human rights in Tajikistan stated:
“Tens of ethnic Pamiri protesters were killed by security forces as demonstrations were violently suppressed and an 'anti-terrorist operation' was launched in the east of the country. Activists, local leaders, journalists and bloggers were arrested and sentenced in unfair trials. Many reported being tortured. Access to information, including through the media and internet, remained heavily restricted. Domestic violence remained widespread with victims rarely securing justice or support. Afghan refugees continued to be detained and deported.”
"The State of the World's Human Rights 2022/23" by Amnesty International (2023)15
“Tajikistan's human rights record worsened further in 2017, as authorities deepened a severe, widespread crackdown on free expression and association, peaceful political opposition activity, the independent legal profession, and the independent exercise of religious faith.
Well over 150 political activists, including a number of lawyers and journalists, remain unjustly jailed, and the relatives of dissidents who peacefully criticize the government from outside the country are subjected to violent retaliation orchestrated by authorities, including arbitrary detention, threats of rape, confiscation of passports and property, and vigilante justice at the hands of sometimes-violent mobs.
Torture remains a serious concern.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)12
#democracy #freedom #Freedom_of_Speech #Good_Governance #mass_media #politics #UK
Press Freedom Lower is better10 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 201310 | |
1 | Finland | 638 |
2 | Netherlands | 648 |
3 | Norway | 652 |
... | ||
119 | Cameroon | 3478 |
120 | Chad | 3487 |
121 | Brunei | 3545 |
122 | Tajikistan | 3571 |
123 | S. Sudan | 3620 |
124 | Algeria | 3654 |
125 | Ukraine | 3679 |
126 | Honduras | 3692 |
Asia Avg | 4378 | |
World Avg | 3249 | |
q=178. |
The freedom to investigate, publish information, and have access to others' opinion is a fundamental part of today's information-driven world, and is linked with Freedom of Speech and Good Governance. Scores on the Press Freedom Index are calculated according to indicators including pluralism - the degree to which opinions are represented in the media, media independence of authorities, self-censorship, legislation, transparency and the infrastructure that supports news and information, and, the level of violence against journalists which includes lengths of imprisonments. The index "does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted". The rankings are used as one of the datasets of the Social and Moral Development Index16
It must be noted that press freedom is not an indicator of press quality and the press itself can be abusive; the UK suffers in particular from a popular brand of nasty reporting that infuses several of its newspapers who are particularly prone to running destructive and often untrue campaigns against victims. The Press Freedom Index notes that "the index should in no way be taken as an indicator of the quality of the media in the countries concerned".
For more, see:
“Over the past year, at least 20 journalists have fled the country, fearing persecution for their professional activities. Journalists perceived to be critical of the government are subjected to harassment and intimidation. As a cult of personality around President Rahmon has risen, journalists are subjected to ever stricter provisions regarding the way they must refer to him and his family. As of April 2017, a new law mandates that all media must refer to Rahmon as “The Founderof Peace and National Unity, Leader of the Nation, President of the Republic of Tajikistan, His Excellency Emomali Rahmon.””
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)12
#burundi #eritrea #france #human_rights #indonesia #slavery
Slavery Lower is better7 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2018 % Victims7 | |
1 | Japan | 0.03 |
2= | Canada | 0.05 |
2= | Taiwan | 0.05 |
... | ||
90 | Azerbaijan | 0.45 |
91= | Bulgaria | 0.45 |
91= | Burkina Faso | 0.45 |
91= | Tajikistan | 0.45 |
94 | Indonesia | 0.47 |
95= | Ghana | 0.48 |
95= | Iraq | 0.48 |
95= | Gabon | 0.48 |
Asia Avg | 0.79 | |
World Avg | 0.65 | |
q=167. |
The taking of slaves has been an unwholesome feature of Human cultures since prehistory17. Private households and national endeavours have frequently been augmented with the use of slaves. The Egyptian and Roman empires both thrived on them for both purposes. Aside from labourers they are often abused sexually by their owners and their owners' friends18. The era of colonialism and the beginnings of globalisation changed nothing: the imprisonment and forced movements of labour continued to destroy many lives except that new justifications were invented based on Christian doctrine and the effort to convert non-Christians. By 1786 over 12 million slaves had been extracted from Africa and sent to colonial labour camps, with a truly atrocious condition of life19. But they were not the only ones to blame; in Africa internal nations such as the Asantes sold and bought tens of thousands of slaves20.
The abolition of the slave trade was a long and slow process. Until a relatively modern time, even philosophers, religious leaders and those concerned with ethics justified, or ignored, the problem of slavery21. The first abolitionists were always the slaves themselves. Their protests and rebellions caused the industry to become too expensive to continue. After that, it was the economic costs of maintain slave colonies that led the British to reject and then oppose the slave trade globally. Finally, the enlightenment-era thinkers of France encouraged moral and ethical thinking including the declaration of the inherent value of human life and human dignity22. A long-overdue wave of compassionate and conscientious movements swept across the West, eliminating public support for slavery, until the industries and churches that supported it had no choice but to back down.
'Modern slavery' includes forced labour (often of the under-age), debt bondage (especially generational), sexual slavery, chattel slavery and other forms of abuse, some of which can be surprisingly difficult to detect, but often target those fleeing from warzones and the vulnerable.23. Some industries (diamond, clothing, coal) from some countries (Burundi24, Eritrea24, Indonesia25) are a particular concern. The Walk Free Foundation, say that in 2016, 40.3 million people were living in modern slavery26.
For more, see:
Personal, Civil & Economic Freedom Lower is better6 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2014 Rank6 | |
1 | Hong Kong | 1 |
2 | Switzerland | 2 |
3 | New Zealand | 3 |
... | ||
80= | Bhutan | 79 |
80= | Benin | 79 |
82 | Brazil | 82 |
83 | Tajikistan | 83 |
84 | Nepal | 84 |
85= | Barbados | 85 |
85= | Rwanda | 85 |
87 | India | 87 |
Asia Avg | 94.6 | |
World Avg | 79.7 | |
q=159. |
The Human Freedom Index published by the Fraser Institute is...
“... a broad measure of human freedom, understood as the absence of coercive constraint. It uses 79 distinct indicators of personal and economic freedom in the following areas: Rule of Law, Security and Safety, Movement, Religion, Association, Assembly, and Civil Society, Expression, Relationships, Size of Government, Legal System and Property Rights, Access to Sound Money, Freedom to Trade Internationally, Regulation of Credit, Labor, and Business. [...]
The highest levels of freedom are in Western Europe, Northern Europe, and North America (Canada and the United States. The lowest levels are in the Middle East and North Africa, South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. [...]
Countries in the top quartile of freedom enjoy a significant higher per capita income ($37,147) [compared with] the least-free quartile [at] $8,700). The HFI finds a strong correlation between human freedom and democracy.”
"The Human Freedom Index" by The Fraser Institute (2016)27
For more, see:
#freedom #human_rights #hungary #politics #USA
Freedom in the World Lower is better | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2024 Score | |
1= | Norway | 1.0 |
1= | Canada | 1.0 |
1= | Cape Verde | 1.0 |
... | ||
198 | Myanmar (Burma) | 7.0 |
199= | Eritrea | 7.0 |
199= | Central African Rep. | 7.0 |
199= | Azerbaijan | 7.0 |
199= | Sudan | 7.0 |
199= | Turkmenistan | 7.0 |
199= | Somalia | 7.0 |
199= | Tajikistan | 7.0 |
Asia Avg | 5.0 | |
World Avg | 3.7 | |
q=205. |
Freedom House's long-standing annual report has been running since the 1970s, collecting data on political rights (PR) and civil liberties (CL). Their reports rate countries as "Free", "Partially Free" or "Not Free", however the results here are based on their numerical values. Many countries score the best combination of scores (1 and 1), which is why the table of results show many places equally placed in 1st place. In the past two decades, some well-established democracies like the USA and Hungary have been falling. Whilst most of the world in general is improving rights and freedoms over time, the 2020s has seen some regression.
For more, see:
Human Rights Watch Comments Higher is better5 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2017 Score5 | |
1= | UK | 9 |
1= | France | 9 |
1= | Germany | 9 |
... | ||
84 | Bahrain | -5 |
85= | Venezuela | -5 |
85= | Oman | -5 |
85= | Tajikistan | -5 |
85= | Lebanon | -5 |
85= | Mali | -5 |
85= | Israel | -5 |
91 | UAE | -6 |
Asia Avg | -5.0 | |
World Avg | -1.9 | |
q=123. |
Human Rights Watch comments concentrate mostly on negative issues, however, they also make positive comments for those countries that engage in human rights defence around the world, or who make improvements at home. By adding up positive and negative comments (including double-points for negatives that involve large scales and crimes against humanity), the Social and Moral Index turns HRW commentary into quantified values. Some countries may be unfairly penalized because HRW have not examined them, and, some countries "get away" with abuses if they manage to hide it, or if it goes unnoticed - a negative point has been given for those countries in which HRW specifically state that access to investigators has been barred. The points were limited to a minimum of -10 because there are some points at which things are so bad, with abuses affecting so many, it is difficult to be more specific about the depths of the issues.
For more, see:
Nominal Commitment to HR Higher is better4 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2009 Treaties4 | |
1 | Argentina | 24 |
2= | Chile | 23 |
2= | Costa Rica | 23 |
... | ||
85 | Togo | 16 |
86= | Belarus | 16 |
86= | Seychelles | 16 |
86= | Tajikistan | 16 |
86= | Ghana | 16 |
86= | Belize | 16 |
86= | Monaco | 16 |
86= | Latvia | 16 |
Asia Avg | 12.7 | |
World Avg | 15.1 | |
q=194. |
There are many international agreements on human rights, and, many mechanisms by which countries can be brought to account for their actions. Together, these have been the biggest historical movement in the fight against oppression and inhumanity. Or, putting it another way: these are rejected mostly by those who wish to oppress inhumanely. None of them are perfect and many people object to various components and wordings, but, no-one has come up with, and enforced, better methods of controlling the occasional desires that states and peoples have of causing angst for other states and peoples in a violent, unjust or inhumane way. Points are awarded for the number of human rights agreements ratified by the country, plus the acceptance of the petition mechanisms for disputes. The maximum possible score in 2009 was 24.
For more, see:
#human_rights #international_law #micronesia #politics #small_islands
HR Treaties Lag Lower is better28 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2019 Avg Yrs/Treaty28 | |
1 | Ecuador | 2.15 |
2 | Uruguay | 2.25 |
3 | Tunisia | 3.65 |
... | ||
108 | Armenia | 11.00 |
109 | Lithuania | 11.03 |
110 | Mozambique | 11.04 |
111 | Tajikistan | 11.08 |
112 | Ethiopia | 11.13 |
113 | Slovenia | 11.13 |
114 | Dominica | 11.14 |
115 | Benin | 11.15 |
Asia Avg | 10.97 | |
World Avg | 10.02 | |
q=195. |
Human Rights (HR) Treaties Lag is a count of how long it took each country to sign each of 11 key HR treaties. From the date of the first signatory of each treaty, all other countries have one point added to their score for each day they delayed in signing. Results are presented as average time in years to sign each one. The lower a country's score, the more enthusiastically it has taken on international Human Rights Treaties - which are, of course, minimal standards of good governance. The slowest are the countries of Micronesia, Melanesia, Australasia and Polynesia all lagged by over 12 years per treaty. The best regions are The Americas, Scandinavia and the Mediterranean.
For more, see:
Tajikistan has made some steps towards ending gender inequality but much more needs to be done.
See:
#gender #gender_equality #human_rights #misogyny #women
Gender Inequality Lower is better3 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 20153 | |
1 | Switzerland | 0.04 |
2 | Denmark | 0.04 |
3 | Netherlands | 0.04 |
... | ||
63 | Costa Rica | 0.31 |
64 | Maldives | 0.31 |
65 | Chile | 0.32 |
66 | Tajikistan | 0.32 |
67 | Trinidad & Tobago | 0.32 |
68 | Azerbaijan | 0.33 |
69 | Turkey | 0.33 |
70 | Kuwait | 0.33 |
Asia Avg | 0.36 | |
World Avg | 0.36 | |
q=159. |
The UN Human Development Reports include statistics on gender equality which take into account things like maternal mortality, access to political power (seats in parliament) and differences between male and female education rates. Gender inequality is not a necessary part of early human development. Although a separation of roles is almost universal due to different strengths between the genders, this does not have to mean that women are subdued, and, such patriarchalism is not universal in ancient history. Those cultures and peoples who shed, or never developed, the idea that mankind ought to dominate womankind, are better cultures and peoples than those who, even today, cling violently to those mores.
For more, see:
#gender #gender_equality #prejudice #women
Gender Biases Lower is better11 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2022 %11 | |
1 | Sweden | 31.829 |
2 | New Zealand | 34.430 |
3 | Australia | 37.030 |
... | ||
81 | Nigeria | 99.530 |
82 | Malaysia | 99.530 |
83 | Egypt | 99.630 |
84 | Indonesia | 99.730 |
85 | Libya | 99.730 |
86 | Pakistan | 99.830 |
87 | Qatar | 99.829 |
88 | Tajikistan | 99.930 |
Asia Avg | 94.24 | |
World Avg | 83.93 | |
q=88. |
The Gender Social Norms Index (GSNI) looks at gender biases across seven criteria; the % given here is for the total people who are biased across any of those criteria. By subtracting the value from 100%, you can see that those who do well on this index, you are seeing a count of those who do not appear to be biased against women in any of the criteria, and so, doing well on this index is a very positive sign for any country.
The data was included in UN (2022) with full results in Annex table AS6.7.1; their data stems for ranges between 2005 and 2022, depending on the country in question.
#christianity #gender_equality #human_rights #politics #women
Year Women Can Vote Lower is better | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | Total Year | |
1 | New Zealand | 1893 |
2 | Australia | 1902 |
3 | Finland | 1906 |
... | ||
26= | Armenia | 1921 |
26= | Georgia | 1921 |
28 | Ireland | 1922 |
29= | Tajikistan | 1924 |
29= | Mongolia | 1924 |
29= | St Lucia | 1924 |
32 | Turkmenistan | 1927 |
33 | UK | 1928 |
Asia Avg | 1907 | |
World Avg | 1930 | |
q=189. |
Women now have equal rights in the vast majority of countries across the world. Although academic literature oftens talks of when a country "grants women the right to vote", this enforces a backwards way of thinking. Women always had the right to vote, however, they were frequently denied that right. The opposition to women's ability to vote in equality with man was most consistently and powerfully opposed by the Catholic Church, other Christian organisations, Islamic authorities and some other religious and secular traditionalists.
For more, see:
#equality #homosexuality #human_rights #ICCPR #intolerance #sexuality #tolerance
LGBT Equality Higher is better8 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2017 Score8 | |
1 | Netherlands | 103 |
2 | Belgium | 90 |
3 | Sweden | 86 |
... | ||
106= | China | 12 |
107 | Djibouti | 11 |
108= | Mali | 11 |
108= | Tajikistan | 11 |
110 | Gabon | 10 |
111= | Bahamas | 10 |
112 | Kazakhstan | 8 |
113= | N. Korea | 8 |
Asia Avg | -02.1 | |
World Avg | 12.6 | |
q=196. |
Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) folk is rife across the world. Legal restrictions co-exist alongside social stigmatisation and physical violence31. LGBT tolerance and equal rights have been fought for country-by-country across the world, often against tightly entrenched cultural and religious opposition. Adult consensual sexual activity is a Human Right, protected by privacy laws32. Despite this, homosexual activity is outlawed in around 80 countries31. The Social & Moral LGBT Equality Index was created to compare countries and regions, granting points to each country for a variety of factors including how long gay sex has been criminalized and the extent of LGBT legal rights. Graded negative points are given for criminality of homosexuality, unequal ages of consent, legal punishments and for not signing international accords on LGBT tolerance. The signs in many developed countries are positive, and things are gradually improving. Europe is by far the least prejudiced region (Scandinavia in particular being exemplary). The Middle East and then Africa are the least morally developed, where cultural bias goes hand-in-hand with state intolerance, all too often including physical violence.
For more, see:
#europe #freedom_of_belief #freethought #human_rights #netherlands #religion #religious_tolerance #secularism #the_enlightenment
Freedom of Thought Lower is better9 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 20219 | |
1= | Belgium | 1.0 |
1= | Netherlands | 1.0 |
1= | Taiwan | 1.0 |
... | ||
117 | Armenia | 3.3 |
118= | Philippines | 3.3 |
118= | Trinidad & Tobago | 3.3 |
118= | Tajikistan | 3.3 |
118= | Bosnia & Herzegovina | 3.3 |
118= | Croatia | 3.3 |
118= | Singapore | 3.3 |
118= | Djibouti | 3.3 |
Asia Avg | 3.7 | |
World Avg | 3.0 | |
q=196. |
Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Belief are upheld in Article 18 the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights33. It affirms that it is a basic human right that all people are free to change their beliefs and religion as they wish34. No countries voted against this (although eight abstained). This right was first recognized clearly in the policies of religious toleration of the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe in the post-enlightenment era35 of the 19th century. In democratic countries, freedom of belief and religion is now taken for granted36. In 2016 a study found that over 180 countries in the world had come to guarantee freedom of religion and belief37. The best countries at doing so are Taiwan, Belgium and The Netherlands9,38 and the worst: Afghanistan, N. Korea, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia9,39.
Long-term studies have shown that religious violence and persecution both decrease in cultures where religious freedom is guaranteed40. Despite this, there still are many who are strongly against freedom of belief34, including entire cultures and many individual communities of religious believers. Their alternative is that you are not free to believe what you want and they often state that you cannot change religion without being punished (often including the death penalty): this is bemoaned as one of the most dangerous elements of religion41 and "the denial of religious freedoms is inevitably intertwined with the denial of other freedoms"42 and the solution is, everywhere, to allow religious freedom and the freedom of belief.
For more, see:
#islam #religion_in_tajikistan #tajikistan
Religion seems to be tightly controlled in TajikIstan, but it is Islam in particular that been made the subject to prejudiced and draconian legislation, combined with some harassment of those perceived to be Muslims12. A book-registration and blacklisting scheme is being used to limit the import of religious books12. The US Commission on International Religious Freedom designates Tajikistan as a "country of particular concern" with respect to religious freedom12.
“In August, continuing a multi-year campaign of strict control of religious practices, authorities introduced a new law urging citizens to "stick to traditional and national dress." While carrying no penalties, the law appears to specifically discourage women from wearing the Islamic hijab. ... Authorities installed surveillance cameras in numerous mosques and subjected men wearing long beards to harassment and intimidation, in some cases forcibly shaving their beards. [...]
Tajikistan´s Culture Ministry announced [in 2017] that books may not be brought into or taken out of the country without written approval, regardless of the language of the texts. Travelers are required to fill out an application “citing the name of the books, stating their language, the place of publication (and) the name of the authors…” Tajikistan´s State Religious Affairs Committee and Interior Ministry have compiled a blacklist of banned books, most religious in nature, but also including books of spells.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)12