The Human Truth Foundation

Human Rights and Freedom in Norway

https://www.humantruth.info/norway_human_rights_and_freedom.html

By Vexen Crabtree 2018

#human_rights #norway #norway_slavery #slavery

Norway
Kingdom of Norway

[Country Profile Page]
Flag
StatusIndependent State
Social and Moral Index2nd best
LocationEurope, Scandinavia
Population5.3m1
Life Expectancy83.23yrs (2017)2

When it comes to ensuring human rights and freedom, Norway leads the world, setting excellent examples. Norway performs the best for combatting modern slavery3, supporting press freedom4 and in its average Freedom in the World rating. It does the second-best when it comes to opposing gender inequality5. It comes in the best 20 in the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators)6 (one of the lowest in Europe), freethought7, LGBT equality8, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms9 and in its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice10. And finally, it does better than average in terms of its nominal commitment to Human Rights11 and in commentary in Human Rights Watch reports12 (but bad for Europe). Since 2009, gay couples in Norway have been able to marry and adopt children despite resistance from members of the Christian Democratic Party and the Lutheran-affiliated Church13. Human Rights Watch's 2018 report states that Norway's support of women's rights at home and internationally has been notable14.


1. Norway's Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance

#equality #freedom #gender_equality #human_rights #morals #norway #politics #prejudice #tolerance

Compared to Europe (2025)15
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank15
1Sweden5.9
2Norway8.0
3Denmark8.1
4Netherlands9.0
5Iceland12.5
6Austria15.0
7Luxembourg15.8
8Finland15.8
9Belgium17.5
10Germany19.8
11UK22.7
12Ireland23.7
13Switzerland25.3
Europe Avg47.37
q=48.
Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025)15
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank15
1Sweden5.9
2Norway8.0
3Denmark8.1
4Netherlands9.0
5Iceland12.5
6New Zealand12.9
7Canada14.9
8Austria15.0
9Luxembourg15.8
10Finland15.8
11Australia16.8
12Belgium17.5
World Avg86.35
q=198.

The best countries in the world at ensuring human rights, fostering equality and promoting tolerance, are Sweden, Norway and Denmark16. These countries are displaying the best traits that humanity has to offer. The worst countries are N. Korea, Somalia and Eritrea16.

25 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on supporting press freedom, combatting modern slavery, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms, its average Freedom in the World rating, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports, its nominal commitment to Human Rights, speed of uptake of HR treaties, opposing gender inequality, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators), the year from which women could participate in democracy, its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, LGBT equality and freethought. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe16, whereas the worst are The Middle East, Africa and Asia16.

For more, see:

Amnesty International's 2023-23 summary on human rights in Norway stated:

Norway received over 36,122 people fleeing Ukraine. A law on human rights in business and the supply chain entered into force in July. A report by the Group of Experts monitoring Norway’s implementation of the Istanbul Convention urged the government to redefine rape in criminal law as sexual intercourse without freely given consent.

"The State of the World's Human Rights 2022/23" by Amnesty International (2023)17

2. Human Rights & Tolerance Datasets

2.1. Press Freedom

#democracy #freedom #Freedom_of_Speech #Good_Governance #mass_media #politics #UK

Press Freedom
Higher is better
4
Pos.20254
1Norway92.31
2Estonia89.46
3Netherlands88.64
4Sweden88.13
5Finland87.18
6Denmark86.93
7Ireland86.92
8Portugal84.26
9Switzerland83.98
10Czechia83.96
11Germany83.85
12Liechtenstein83.42
Europe Avg70.63
World Avg54.65
q=179.
Norway ranks best in the world in terms of supporting press freedom.

The freedom to investigate, publish information, and have access to others' opinion is a fundamental part of today's information-driven world, and is linked with Freedom of Speech and Good Governance. Scores on the Press Freedom Index are calculated according to indicators including pluralism - the degree to which opinions are represented in the media, media independence of authorities, self-censorship, legislation, transparency and the infrastructure that supports news and information, and, the level of violence against journalists which includes lengths of imprisonments. The index "does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted". The rankings are used as one of the datasets of the Social and Moral Development Index18

It must be noted that press freedom is not an indicator of press quality and the press itself can be abusive; the UK suffers in particular from a popular brand of nasty reporting that infuses several of its newspapers who are particularly prone to running destructive and often untrue campaigns against victims. The Press Freedom Index notes that "the index should in no way be taken as an indicator of the quality of the media in the countries concerned".

For more, see:

Averages by decade for Norway (for the ranks, lower is better):

Press Freedom2000s 
Average
2010s 
Average
Norway:0.7892.48
World Rank:2nd ⇡  1st
World Avg:27.4465.91

2.2. Slavery in the 2020s

#australia #burundi #eritrea #france #germany #human_rights #indonesia #slavery

Slavery in the 2020s
Lower is better
3
Pos.Total
Per 10003
1=Switzerland0.50
1=Norway0.50
3=Germany0.60
3=Sweden0.60
3=Denmark0.60
3=Netherlands0.60
7Belgium1.00
8=Japan1.10
8=Ireland1.10
10Finland1.40
11Mauritius1.50
12=Australia1.60
Europe Avg5.64
World Avg7.15
q=160.
Regarding combatting modern slavery, Norway comes best in the world.

Modern slavery includes forced labour (often of the under-age), debt bondage (especially generational), sexual slavery, chattel slavery and other forms of abuse, some of which can be surprisingly difficult to detect, but often target those fleeing from warzones, and poverty-stricken vulnerable.19. Some industries (diamond, clothing, coal) from some countries (Burundi20, Eritrea20, Indonesia21) are a particular concern. The Walk Free Foundation, say in their 2023 report that 50 million people are living in modern slavery20.

For more, see:

The Walk Free Foundation in 2023 says that Norway (along with Australia, France and Germany) is doing the correct due diligence and "setting new standards for the type of legislation we would like to see adopted everywhere" for preventing modern forms of slvery22.

Averages by decade for Norway (for the ranks, lower is better):

Slavery2010s 
Average
2020s 
Average
Norway:1.800.50
World Rank:25th ⇡  1st
World Avg:6.547.15

2.3. Personal, Civil & Economic Freedom

#freedom #politics

Personal, Civil & Economic Freedom
Lower is better
9
Pos.2014
Rank9
1Hong Kong1
2Switzerland2
3New Zealand3
...
10Netherlands10
11=Luxembourg11
11=Austria11
13=Norway13
13=Germany13
15Sweden15
16Malta16
17Belgium17
Europe Avg33.9
World Avg79.7
q=159.
In terms of supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms, Norway comes 13th-best in the world.

The Human Freedom Index published by the Fraser Institute is...

... a broad measure of human freedom, understood as the absence of coercive constraint. It uses 79 distinct indicators of personal and economic freedom in the following areas: Rule of Law, Security and Safety, Movement, Religion, Association, Assembly, and Civil Society, Expression, Relationships, Size of Government, Legal System and Property Rights, Access to Sound Money, Freedom to Trade Internationally, Regulation of Credit, Labor, and Business. [...]

The highest levels of freedom are in Western Europe, Northern Europe, and North America (Canada and the United States. The lowest levels are in the Middle East and North Africa, South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. [...]

Countries in the top quartile of freedom enjoy a significant higher per capita income ($37,147) [compared with] the least-free quartile [at] $8,700). The HFI finds a strong correlation between human freedom and democracy.

"The Human Freedom Index" by The Fraser Institute (2016)23

For more, see:

2.4. Freedom in the World

#freedom #human_rights #hungary #politics #USA

Freedom in the World
Lower is better
Pos.2024
Score
1=Norway1.0
1=Canada1.0
1=Cape Verde1.0
1=Slovakia1.0
1=Chile1.0
1=San Marino1.0
1=Costa Rica1.0
1=St Vincent & Grenadines1.0
1=St Lucia1.0
1=Cyprus1.0
1=Denmark1.0
1=Dominica1.0
Europe Avg2.2
World Avg3.7
q=205.
Regarding its average Freedom in the World rating, Norway is best in the world.

Freedom House's long-standing annual report has been running since the 1970s, collecting data on political rights (PR) and civil liberties (CL). Their reports rate countries as "Free", "Partially Free" or "Not Free", however the results here are based on their numerical values. Many countries score the best combination of scores (1 and 1), which is why the table of results show many places equally placed in 1st place. In the past two decades, some well-established democracies like the USA and Hungary have been falling. Whilst most of the world in general is improving rights and freedoms over time, the 2020s has seen some regression.

For more, see:

Averages by decade for Norway (for the ranks, lower is better):

Freedom in the World1970s 
Average
1980s 
Average
1990s 
Average
2000s 
Average
2010s 
Average
Norway:1.01.01.01.01.0
World Rank:1st1st1st1st1st
World Avg:4.34.23.63.43.4

2.5. Human Rights Watch Comments

#human_rights

Human Rights Watch Comments
Higher is better
12
Pos.2017
Score12
1=UK9
1=France9
1=Germany9
...
35=Chile2
36=Paraguay1
36=Costa Rica1
36=Norway1
36=Panama1
40=Ukraine0
40=Nepal0
40=S. Korea0
Europe Avg3.5
World Avg-1.9
q=123.
Norway comes 36th in the world regarding commentary in Human Rights Watch reports.

Human Rights Watch comments concentrate mostly on negative issues, however, they also make positive comments for those countries that engage in human rights defence around the world, or who make improvements at home. By adding up positive and negative comments (including double-points for negatives that involve large scales and crimes against humanity), the Social and Moral Index turns HRW commentary into quantified values. Some countries may be unfairly penalized because HRW have not examined them, and, some countries "get away" with abuses if they manage to hide it, or if it goes unnoticed - a negative point has been given for those countries in which HRW specifically state that access to investigators has been barred. The points were limited to a minimum of -10 because there are some points at which things are so bad, with abuses affecting so many, it is difficult to be more specific about the depths of the issues.

For more, see:

2.6. Nominal Commitment to HR

#human_rights

Nominal Commitment to HR
Higher is better
11
Pos.2009
Treaties11
1Argentina24
2=Chile23
2=Costa Rica23
...
42=Romania20
42=Bulgaria20
42=Burkina Faso20
42=Norway20
42=Portugal20
42=Poland20
42=S. Korea20
42=Panama20
Europe Avg19.5
World Avg15.1
q=194.
Norway ranks 29th in the world with regard to its nominal commitment to Human Rights.

There are many international agreements on human rights, and, many mechanisms by which countries can be brought to account for their actions. Together, these have been the biggest historical movement in the fight against oppression and inhumanity. Or, putting it another way: these are rejected mostly by those who wish to oppress inhumanely. None of them are perfect and many people object to various components and wordings, but, no-one has come up with, and enforced, better methods of controlling the occasional desires that states and peoples have of causing angst for other states and peoples in a violent, unjust or inhumane way. Points are awarded for the number of human rights agreements ratified by the country, plus the acceptance of the petition mechanisms for disputes. The maximum possible score in 2009 was 24.

For more, see:

2.7. HR Treaties Lag

#human_rights #international_law #micronesia #politics #small_islands

HR Treaties Lag
Lower is better
24
Pos.2019
Avg Yrs/Treaty24
1Ecuador2.15
2Uruguay2.25
3Tunisia3.65
...
16Sweden4.88
17Ukraine4.94
18Mali4.97
19Norway5.05
20Denmark5.06
21S. Sudan5.41
22Morocco5.44
23Romania5.52
Europe Avg9.09
World Avg10.02
q=195.
Regarding speed of uptake of HR treaties, Norway is 19th-best in the world.

Human Rights (HR) Treaties Lag is a count of how long it took each country to sign each of 11 key HR treaties. From the date of the first signatory of each treaty, all other countries have one point added to their score for each day they delayed in signing. Results are presented as average time in years to sign each one. The lower a country's score, the more enthusiastically it has taken on international Human Rights Treaties - which are, of course, minimal standards of good governance. The slowest are the countries of Micronesia, Melanesia, Australasia and Polynesia all lagged by over 12 years per treaty. The best regions are The Americas, Scandinavia and the Mediterranean.

For more, see:

3. Gender Equality Datasets

#norway

Norway is notable for its equality between the sexes and this has been a feature of the country's culture for quite some time.

See:

Human Rights Watch's 2018 report states that Norway's support of women's rights at home and internationally has been notable14.

3.1. Gender Inequality

#gender #gender_equality #human_rights #misogyny #women

Gender Inequality
Lower is better
5
Pos.20225
1Denmark0.01
2Norway0.01
3Switzerland0.02
4Sweden0.02
5Netherlands0.03
6Finland0.03
7UAE0.04
8Singapore0.04
9Iceland0.04
10Luxembourg0.04
11Belgium0.05
12Austria0.05
Europe Avg0.12
World Avg0.34
q=166.
Norway is 2nd-best in the world with regard to opposing gender inequality; only Denmark does better.

The UN Human Development Reports include statistics on gender equality which take into account things like maternal mortality, access to political power (seats in parliament) and differences between male and female education rates. Gender inequality is not a necessary part of early human development. Although a separation of roles is almost universal due to different strengths between the genders, this does not have to mean that women are subdued, and, such patriarchalism is not universal in ancient history. Those cultures and peoples who shed, or never developed, the idea that mankind ought to dominate womankind, are better cultures and peoples than those who, even today, cling violently to those mores.

For more, see:

Throughout the 1990s to 2010s, Norway sat amongst the 10 countries with the least amount of Gender Inequality.

Averages by decade for Norway (for the ranks, lower is better):

Gender Inequality1990s 
Average
2000s 
Average
2010s 
Average
Norway:0.110.080.04
World Rank:5th5th ⇡  4th
World Avg:0.440.410.37

3.2. Gender Biases

#gender #gender_equality #prejudice #women

Gender Biases
Lower is better
6
Pos.2022
%6
1Sweden31.825
2New Zealand34.426
3Australia37.026
4Germany40.226
5Canada41.126
6Norway42.127
7Andorra43.126
8Netherlands44.225
9USA50.726
10Finland52.527
11Spain53.525
12Switzerland56.927
Europe Avg69.08
World Avg83.93
q=88.
Amongst the best in Europe Norway comes 6th-best in the world in terms of the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators).

The Gender Social Norms Index (GSNI) looks at gender biases across seven criteria; the % given here is for the total people who are biased across any of those criteria. By subtracting the value from 100%, you can see that those who do well on this index, you are seeing a count of those who do not appear to be biased against women in any of the criteria, and so, doing well on this index is a very positive sign for any country.

The data was included in UN (2022) with full results in Annex table AS6.7.1; their data stems for ranges between 2005 and 2022, depending on the country in question.

3.3. Year Women Can Vote

#christianity #gender_equality #human_rights #politics #women

Year Women Can Vote
Lower is better
Pos.Total
Year
1New Zealand1893
2Australia1902
3Finland1906
4Norway1913
5=Denmark1915
5=Iceland1915
7Russia1917
8=Latvia1918
8=Estonia1918
8=Kyrgyzstan1918
11=Austria1919
11=Slovakia1919
Europe Avg1895
World Avg1930
q=189.
Norway is positioned 4th-best in the world in terms of the year from which women could participate in democracy.

Women now have equal rights in the vast majority of countries across the world. Although academic literature oftens talks of when a country "grants women the right to vote", this enforces a backwards way of thinking. Women always had the right to vote, however, they were frequently denied that right. The opposition to women's ability to vote in equality with man was most consistently and powerfully opposed by the Catholic Church, other Christian organisations, Islamic authorities and some other religious and secular traditionalists.

For more, see:

4. Prejudice Datasets

4.1. Anti-Semite Opinions

#antisemitism #christianity #germany #indonesia #jordan #judaism #laos #morocco #netherlands #pakistan #philippines #religion #religious_violence #saudi_arabia #spain #sweden #turkey #UK #vietnam

Anti-Semite Opinions
Lower is better
10
Pos.2014
%10
1Laos0
2Philippines3
3Sweden4
...
12=Canada14
12=New Zealand14
12=Australia14
15=Norway15
15=Ghana15
15=Finland15
18=Brazil16
18=Singapore16
Europe Avg29.9
World Avg36.8
q=101.
With regard to its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, Norway is 16th-best in the world.

Anti-Semitism is the word given to irrational racism against Jews. It's not the same as anti-Judaism (arguments against the religion) nor the same as anti-Zionism (arguments against Israel). In history, influential Christian theologians concocted the arguments against Jews that led, very early on, to widespread Christian action against Jews28,29,30,31. As Christianity rose to power in the West and presided over the Dark Ages, there were repeated violent outbursts against Jews of the most horrible kind. Entire Crusades were aimed at them and the feared Spanish Inquisition paid Jews particular attention. The horror of the holocaust instigated by German Nazis in the 1940s was followed (finally) by the era of European human rights and a movement against racism in general.

The places that are the least anti-Semitical are a few countries of south-east Asia (Laos, the Philippines and Vietnam) and some of the secular liberal democracies of Europe (Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK). The worst countries for antisemitism are Islamic states of the Middle East32, which are undergoing their own Dark Age. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Morocco, Indonesia, Pakistan and Turkey see the most oppressive and violent actions towards Jews33,34. Jews in Muslim countries face a host of restrictions and "ceaseless humiliation and regular pogroms"35. In 2004 the European Union Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia reported on violent anti-Jew crimes in the EU and found that that largest group of perpetrators were young Muslim males36.

For more, see:

4.2. LGBT Equality

#equality #homosexuality #human_rights #ICCPR #intolerance #norway #sexuality #tolerance

Since 2009, gay couples in Norway have been able to marry, adopt children and undergo artificial insemination. The new law, which was passed in 2008, replaced a 1993 law permitting civil unions. It passed despite resistance from members of the Christian Democratic Party and the Progress Party, as well as a public controversy over state funding for fertility treatments for lesbian couples.13

The largest religious group in the country, the Lutheran-affiliated Church of Norway, initially voted to prohibit its pastors from conducting same-sex weddings. But the Church of Norway changed course and began sanctioning same-sex weddings in early 2017.13

LGBT Equality
Higher is better
8
Pos.2017
Score8
1Netherlands103
2Belgium90
3Sweden86
4Brazil81
5Spain79
6=France78
6=S. Africa78
8Uruguay77
9=Norway72
9=Denmark72
9=Iceland72
12UK72
Europe Avg46.9
World Avg12.6
q=196.
Norway ranks 9th-best in the world in terms of LGBT equality.

Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) folk is rife across the world. Legal restrictions co-exist alongside social stigmatisation and physical violence37. LGBT tolerance and equal rights have been fought for country-by-country across the world, often against tightly entrenched cultural and religious opposition. Adult consensual sexual activity is a Human Right, protected by privacy laws38. Despite this, homosexual activity is outlawed in around 80 countries37. The Social & Moral LGBT Equality Index was created to compare countries and regions, granting points to each country for a variety of factors including how long gay sex has been criminalized and the extent of LGBT legal rights. Graded negative points are given for criminality of homosexuality, unequal ages of consent, legal punishments and for not signing international accords on LGBT tolerance. The signs in many developed countries are positive, and things are gradually improving. Europe is by far the least prejudiced region (Scandinavia in particular being exemplary). The Middle East and then Africa are the least morally developed, where cultural bias goes hand-in-hand with state intolerance, all too often including physical violence.

For more, see:

4.3. Freedom of Thought

#europe #freedom_of_belief #freethought #human_rights #netherlands #religion #religious_tolerance #secularism #the_enlightenment

Freedom of Thought
Lower is better
7
Pos.20217
1=Belgium1.0
1=Taiwan1.0
1=Netherlands1.0
...
8=France1.3
9=Sweden1.5
9=Iceland1.5
9=Norway1.5
9=Congo, (Brazzaville)1.5
13=Guinea-Bissau1.7
13=Mongolia1.7
13=S. Africa1.7
Europe Avg2.6
World Avg3.0
q=196.
Norway is positioned 9th-best in the world in terms of freethought.

Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Belief are upheld in Article 18 the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights39. It affirms that it is a basic human right that all people are free to change their beliefs and religion as they wish40. No countries voted against this (although eight abstained). This right was first recognized clearly in the policies of religious toleration of the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe in the post-enlightenment era41 of the 19th century. In democratic countries, freedom of belief and religion is now taken for granted42. In 2016 a study found that over 180 countries in the world had come to guarantee freedom of religion and belief43. The best countries at doing so are Belgium, The Netherlands and Taiwan7,44 and the worst: Afghanistan, N. Korea, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia7,45.

Long-term studies have shown that religious violence and persecution both decrease in cultures where religious freedom is guaranteed46. Despite this, there still are many who are strongly against freedom of belief40, including entire cultures and many individual communities of religious believers. Their alternative is that you are not free to believe what you want and they often state that you cannot change religion without being punished (often including the death penalty): this is bemoaned as one of the most dangerous elements of religion47 and "the denial of religious freedoms is inevitably intertwined with the denial of other freedoms"48 and the solution is, everywhere, to allow religious freedom and the freedom of belief.

For more, see: