https://www.humantruth.info/mexico_human_rights_and_freedom.html
By Vexen Crabtree 2019
| Mexico United Mexican States [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
|---|---|
| Status | Independent State |
| Social and Moral Index | 58th best |
| Location | North America, The Americas |
| Population | 126.2m1 |
| Life Expectancy | 70.21yrs (2017)2 |
Mexico does relatively well in ensuring human rights and freedom, compared to many other countries. Mexico does the second-best in terms of its nominal commitment to Human Rights3. It comes in the best 20 in LGBT equality in the 2020s4. It does better than average in terms of its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice5, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators)6 (but bad for The Americas), commentary in Human Rights Watch reports7, freethought8 (but high for The Americas) and in its average Freedom in the World rating (but high for The Americas). Mexico doesn't do so well in other areas. Mexico does worse than average for opposing gender inequality9, combatting modern slavery10 and in supporting press freedom11. Since President Enrique Peña Nieto took office in 2012, "security forces have been implicated in repeated, serious human rights violations during efforts to combat organized crime" included murders and the use of torture12. A long-term problem with "disappearances" and poor forensics support for identifying bodies fails to be adequately addressed.
#equality #freedom #gender_equality #human_rights #mexico #morals #politics #prejudice #tolerance #venezuela
| Compared to The Americas (2025)13 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank13 | |
| 1 | Canada | 17.0 |
| 2 | Uruguay | 30.8 |
| 3 | Costa Rica | 38.8 |
| 4 | USA | 48.3 |
| 5 | Argentina | 48.4 |
| 6 | Brazil | 53.1 |
| 7 | Chile | 61.4 |
| 8 | Bolivia | 65.3 |
| 9 | Mexico | 66.3 |
| 10 | Peru | 68.4 |
| 11 | Trinidad & Tobago | 68.9 |
| 12 | Bahamas | 70.3 |
| 13 | El Salvador | 70.3 |
| The Americas Avg | 75.88 | |
| q=35. | ||
| Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025)13 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank13 | |
| 1 | Sweden | 7.5 |
| 2 | Netherlands | 8.6 |
| 3 | Denmark | 9.0 |
| ... | ||
| 48 | Israel | 64.8 |
| 49 | Cape Verde | 65.1 |
| 50 | Bolivia | 65.3 |
| 51 | Mexico | 66.3 |
| 52 | Serbia | 67.5 |
| 53 | Peru | 68.4 |
| 54 | Bulgaria | 68.8 |
| 55 | Trinidad & Tobago | 68.9 |
| World Avg | 90.04 | |
| q=198. | ||
The best countries in the world at ensuring human rights, fostering equality and promoting tolerance, are Sweden, The Netherlands and Denmark14. These countries are displaying the best traits that humanity has to offer. The worst countries are Somalia, Eritrea and Saudi Arabia14.
30 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on supporting press freedom, combatting modern slavery, its average Freedom in the World rating, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports, its nominal commitment to Human Rights, speed of uptake of HR treaties, opposing gender inequality, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators), the year from which women could participate in democracy, its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, LGBT equality and freethought. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe14, whereas the worst are The Middle East, Africa and Asia14.
For more, see:
Amnesty International's 2023-23 summary on human rights in Mexico stated:
“The government continued to stigmatize feminists and human rights defenders who protested against government inaction on gender-based violence and, in some states, security forces violently repressed women protesters. Killings of journalists remained at record levels; many of the victims had been granted official protection measures. By the end of the year, more than 109,000 people were registered as missing and disappeared. The militarization of public security increased and legislation cemented the involvement of the armed forces in public security tasks until 2028. The National Guard used excessive force in several of its operations. A lack of transparency, accountability and access to information hindered access to truth, justice and reparations for victims of human rights violations and their families.”
"The State of the World's Human Rights 2022/23" by Amnesty International (2023)15
“Unlawful killings of civilians by Mexican security forces “take place at an alarmingly high rate” amid an atmosphere of “systematic and endemic impunity,” according to the United Nations special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions in 2014. [...]
The criminal justice system routinely fails to provide justice to victims of violent crimes and human rights violations. Causes of failure include corruption, inadequate training and resources, and complicity of prosecutors and public defenders with criminals and abusive officials.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)12
Along with 11 others, Mexico signed the Lima Declaration in 2017, condemning "the assault on democratic order and the systematic violation of human rights in Venezuela"16.
#democracy #freedom #Freedom_of_Speech #Good_Governance #mass_media #politics #UK
| Press Freedom Higher is better11 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 202511 | |
| 1 | Norway | 92.31 |
| 2 | Estonia | 89.46 |
| 3 | Netherlands | 88.64 |
| ... | ||
| 120 | Togo | 48.03 |
| 121 | Nigeria | 46.81 |
| 122 | Singapore | 45.78 |
| 123 | Mexico | 45.55 |
| 124 | Burundi | 45.44 |
| 125 | Algeria | 44.64 |
| 126 | Indonesia | 44.13 |
| 127 | Kuwait | 44.06 |
| The Americas Avg | 55.99 | |
| World Avg | 54.65 | |
| q=179. Also scored for 2000s-2010s. | ||
The freedom to investigate, publish information, and have access to others' opinion is a fundamental part of today's information-driven world, and is linked with Freedom of Speech and Good Governance. Scores on the Press Freedom Index are calculated according to indicators including pluralism - the degree to which opinions are represented in the media, media independence of authorities, self-censorship, legislation, transparency and the infrastructure that supports news and information, and, the level of violence against journalists which includes lengths of imprisonments. The index "does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted". The rankings are used as one of the datasets of the Social and Moral Development Index17
It must be noted that press freedom is not an indicator of press quality and the press itself can be abusive; the UK suffers in particular from a popular brand of nasty reporting that infuses several of its newspapers who are particularly prone to running destructive and often untrue campaigns against victims. The Press Freedom Index notes that "the index should in no way be taken as an indicator of the quality of the media in the countries concerned".
For more, see:
“Journalists, particularly those who report on crime or criticize officials, face harassment and attack by both government authorities and criminal groups. Journalists are often driven to self-censorship as a result.
From 2000 through October 2017, 104 journalists were killed and 25 disappeared, according to the Attorney General´s Office. The nongovernmental organization (NGO) Article 19 documented eight cases of journalists killed and one disappeared between January and July 2017.
Authorities routinely fail to investigate crimes against journalists adequately.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)12
Averages by decade for Mexico (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Press Freedom | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico: | 38.70 | 53.14 |
| World Rank: | 131st | ⇣ 147th |
| World Avg: | 27.44 | 65.91 |
#burundi #eritrea #human_rights #indonesia #slavery
| Slavery in the 2020s Lower is better10 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Slavery in the 2020s Per 100010 | |
| 1= | Switzerland | 0.50 |
| 1= | Norway | 0.50 |
| 3= | Germany | 0.60 |
| ... | ||
| 94= | Gambia | 6.50 |
| 94= | Oman | 6.50 |
| 96= | Hungary | 6.60 |
| 96= | Mexico | 6.60 |
| 96= | Dominican Rep. | 6.60 |
| 99= | Bahrain | 6.70 |
| 99= | Indonesia | 6.70 |
| 101= | Libya | 6.80 |
| The Americas Avg | 5.84 | |
| World Avg | 7.15 | |
| q=160. Also scored for 2010s-2020s. | ||
Modern slavery includes forced labour (often of the under-age), debt bondage (especially generational), sexual slavery, chattel slavery and other forms of abuse, some of which can be surprisingly difficult to detect, but often target those fleeing from warzones, and the poverty-stricken vulnerable.18. Some industries (diamond, clothing, coal) from some countries (Burundi19, Eritrea19, Indonesia20) are a particular concern. The Walk Free Foundation, say in their 2023 report, that 50 million people are living in modern slavery19, and, nearly two-thirds of those in forced labour are employed at the end of supply chains working for large multinationals that creating products consumed by rich countries21.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Mexico (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Slavery | 2010s Average | 2020s Average |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico: | 2.70 | 6.60 |
| World Rank: | 53rd | ⇣ 96th |
| World Avg: | 6.54 | 7.15 |
#freedom #human_rights #hungary #politics #USA
| Freedom in the World Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2024 Score | |
| 1= | Norway | 1.0 |
| 1= | Canada | 1.0 |
| 1= | Cape Verde | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 99= | Hungary | 3.0 |
| 100= | Papua New Guinea | 3.5 |
| 100= | Nepal | 3.5 |
| 100= | Mexico | 3.5 |
| 100= | Indonesia | 3.5 |
| 100= | Philippines | 3.5 |
| 100= | Serbia | 3.5 |
| 100= | Kosovo | 5.5 |
| The Americas Avg | 2.7 | |
| World Avg | 3.7 | |
| q=205. Also scored for 1970s-2010s. | ||
Freedom House's long-standing annual report has been running since the 1970s, collecting data on political rights (PR) and civil liberties (CL). Their reports rate countries as "Free", "Partially Free" or "Not Free", however the results here are based on their numerical values. Many countries score the best combination of scores (1 and 1), which is why the table of results show many places equally placed in 1st place. In the past two decades, some well-established democracies like the USA and Hungary have been falling. Whilst most of the world in general is improving rights and freedoms over time, the 2020s has seen some regression.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Mexico (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Freedom in the World | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mexico: | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 3.0 |
| World Rank: | 61st | ⇣ 68th | ⇣ 104th | ⇡ 78th | ⇣ 95th |
| World Avg: | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| Human Rights Watch Comments Higher is better7 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2017 Score7 | |
| 1= | UK | 9 |
| 1= | France | 9 |
| 1= | Germany | 9 |
| ... | ||
| 52= | Georgia | -2 |
| 52= | Turkey | -2 |
| 52= | Tunisia | -2 |
| 52= | Mexico | -2 |
| 52= | Sri Lanka | -2 |
| 52= | S. Africa | -2 |
| 52= | Singapore | -2 |
| 52= | Haiti | -2 |
| The Americas Avg | -0.8 | |
| World Avg | -1.9 | |
| q=123. | ||
Human Rights Watch comments concentrate mostly on negative issues, however, they also make positive comments for those countries that engage in human rights defence around the world, or who make improvements at home. By adding up positive and negative comments (including double-points for negatives that involve large scales and crimes against humanity), the Social and Moral Index turns HRW commentary into quantified values. Some countries may be unfairly penalized because HRW have not examined them, and, some countries "get away" with abuses if they manage to hide it, or if it goes unnoticed - a negative point has been given for those countries in which HRW specifically state that access to investigators has been barred. The points were limited to a minimum of -10 because there are some points at which things are so bad, with abuses affecting so many, it is difficult to be more specific about the depths of the issues.
For more, see:
| Nominal Commitment to HR Higher is better3 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2009 Treaties3 | |
| 1 | Argentina | 24 |
| 2= | Chile | 23 |
| 2= | Costa Rica | 23 |
| 2= | Ecuador | 23 |
| 2= | Germany | 23 |
| 2= | Mexico | 23 |
| 2= | Peru | 23 |
| 2= | Spain | 23 |
| 2= | Slovenia | 23 |
| 2= | Paraguay | 23 |
| 2= | Serbia | 23 |
| 2= | Sweden | 23 |
| The Americas Avg | 16.5 | |
| World Avg | 15.1 | |
| q=194. | ||
There are many international agreements on Human Rights, and, many mechanisms by which countries can be brought to account for their actions. Together, these have been the biggest historical movement in the fight against oppression and inhumanity. Or, putting it another way: these are rejected mostly by those who wish to oppress inhumanely. None of them are perfect and many people object to various components and wordings, but, no-one has come up with, and enforced, better methods of controlling the occasional desires that states and peoples have of causing angst for other states and peoples in a violent, unjust or inhumane way. Points are awarded for the number of Human Rights agreements ratified by the country, plus the acceptance of the petition mechanisms for disputes. The maximum possible score in 2009 was 24.
For more, see:
#human_rights #international_law #micronesia #politics #small_islands
| HR Treaties Lag Lower is better22 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2019 Avg Yrs/Treaty22 | |
| 1 | Ecuador | 2.15 |
| 2 | Uruguay | 2.25 |
| 3 | Tunisia | 3.65 |
| 4 | Colombia | 3.68 |
| 5 | Costa Rica | 4.05 |
| 6 | Mexico | 4.08 |
| 7 | Chile | 4.12 |
| 8 | Philippines | 4.19 |
| 9 | Bulgaria | 4.24 |
| 10 | Panama | 4.26 |
| 11 | Senegal | 4.32 |
| 12 | Namibia | 4.36 |
| The Americas Avg | 8.45 | |
| World Avg | 10.02 | |
| q=195. | ||
Human Rights (HR) Treaties Lag is a count of how long it took each country to sign each of 11 key HR treaties. From the date of the first signatory of each treaty, all other countries have one point added to their score for each day they delayed in signing. Results are presented as average time in years to sign each one. The lower a country's score, the more enthusiastically it has taken on international Human Rights Treaties - which are, of course, minimal standards of good governance. The slowest are the countries of Micronesia, Melanesia, Australasia and Polynesia all lagged by over 12 years per treaty. The best regions are The Americas, Scandinavia and the Mediterranean.
For more, see:
The 1950s saw a late rush of 43 countries, including Mexico and many developing nations, move to cease preventing women from voting. Mexico has made some steps towards ending gender inequality but much more needs to be done.
“Mexican laws do not adequately protect women and girls against domestic and sexual violence. Some provisions, including those that make the severity of punishments for some sexual offenses contingent upon the “chastity” of the victim, contradict international standards.[...] Although the Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that all states must provide emergency contraception and access to abortion for rape victims, many women and girls face serious barriers accessing abortions after sexual violence, including official intimidation.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)12
See:
#gender #gender_equality #human_rights #misogyny #women
| Gender Inequality Lower is better9 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20229 | |
| 1 | Denmark | 0.01 |
| 2 | Norway | 0.01 |
| 3 | Switzerland | 0.02 |
| ... | ||
| 81 | St Lucia | 0.35 |
| 82 | Kyrgyzstan | 0.35 |
| 83 | Jamaica | 0.35 |
| 84 | Mexico | 0.36 |
| 85 | El Salvador | 0.37 |
| 86 | Mauritius | 0.37 |
| 87 | Peru | 0.37 |
| 88 | Ecuador | 0.37 |
| The Americas Avg | 0.36 | |
| World Avg | 0.34 | |
| q=166. Also scored for 1990s-2010s. | ||
The UN Human Development Reports include statistics on gender equality which take into account things like maternal mortality, access to political power (seats in parliament) and differences between male and female education rates. Gender inequality is not a necessary part of early human development. Although a separation of roles is almost universal due to different strengths between the genders, this does not have to mean that women are subdued, and, such patriarchalism is not universal in ancient history. Those cultures and peoples who shed, or never developed, the idea that mankind ought to dominate womankind, are better cultures and peoples than those who, even today, cling violently to those mores.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Mexico (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Gender Inequality | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mexico: | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.38 |
| World Rank: | 64th | ⇣ 77th | ⇣ 84th |
| World Avg: | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.37 |
#gender #gender_equality #prejudice #women
| Gender Biases Lower is better6 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2022 %6 | |
| 1 | Sweden | 31.823 |
| 2 | New Zealand | 34.424 |
| 3 | Australia | 37.024 |
| ... | ||
| 34 | Peru | 89.124 |
| 35 | Guatemala | 89.624 |
| 36 | S. Korea | 89.924 |
| 37 | Mexico | 90.224 |
| 38 | Belarus | 90.423 |
| 39 | Moldova | 90.725 |
| 40 | Colombia | 91.224 |
| 41 | Bolivia | 91.324 |
| The Americas Avg | 82.90 | |
| World Avg | 83.93 | |
| q=88. | ||
The Gender Social Norms Index (GSNI) looks at gender biases across seven criteria; the % given here is for the total people who are biased across any of those criteria. By subtracting the value from 100%, you can see that those who do well on this index, you are seeing a count of those who do not appear to be biased against women in any of the criteria, and so, doing well on this index is a very positive sign for any country.
The data was included in UN (2022) with full results in Annex table AS6.7.1; their data stems for ranges between 2005 and 2022, depending on the country in question.
#christianity #gender_equality #human_rights #politics #women
| Year Women Can Vote Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Year Women Can Vote Year | |
| 1 | New Zealand | 1893 |
| 2 | Australia | 1902 |
| 3 | Finland | 1906 |
| ... | ||
| 93= | Greece | 1952 |
| 93= | Lebanon | 1952 |
| 95= | Guyana | 1953 |
| 95= | Mexico | 1953 |
| 95= | Bhutan | 1953 |
| 95= | Syria | 1953 |
| 99= | Colombia | 1954 |
| 99= | Belize | 1954 |
| The Americas Avg | 1947 | |
| World Avg | 1930 | |
| q=189. | ||
Women now have equal rights in the vast majority of countries across the world. Although academic literature oftens talks of when a country "grants women the right to vote", this enforces a backwards way of thinking. Women always had the right to vote, however, they were frequently denied that right. The opposition to women's ability to vote in equality with man was most consistently and powerfully opposed by the Catholic Church, other Christian organisations, Islamic authorities and some other religious and secular traditionalists.
For more, see:
#antisemitism #christianity #germany #indonesia #jordan #judaism #laos #morocco #netherlands #pakistan #philippines #religion #religious_violence #saudi_arabia #spain #sweden #turkey #UK #vietnam
| Anti-Semite Opinions Lower is better5 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2014 %5 | |
| 1 | Laos | 0 |
| 2 | Philippines | 3 |
| 3 | Sweden | 4 |
| ... | ||
| 31 | Japan | 23 |
| 32= | Trinidad & Tobago | 24 |
| 32= | Argentina | 24 |
| 32= | Mexico | 24 |
| 35= | Haiti | 26 |
| 35= | Mongolia | 26 |
| 35= | Switzerland | 26 |
| 38= | Belgium | 27 |
| The Americas Avg | 29.7 | |
| World Avg | 36.8 | |
| q=101. | ||
Anti-Semitism is the word given to irrational racism against Jews. It's not the same as anti-Judaism (arguments against the religion) nor the same as anti-Zionism (arguments against Israel). In history, influential Christian theologians concocted the arguments against Jews that led, very early on, to widespread Christian action against Jews26,27,28,29. As Christianity rose to power in the West and presided over the Dark Ages, there were repeated violent outbursts against Jews of the most horrible kind. Entire Crusades were aimed at them and the feared Spanish Inquisition paid Jews particular attention. The horror of the holocaust instigated by German Nazis in the 1940s was followed (finally) by the era of European human rights and a movement against racism in general.
The places that are the least anti-Semitical are a few countries of south-east Asia (Laos, the Philippines and Vietnam) and some of the secular liberal democracies of Europe (Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK). The worst countries for antisemitism are Islamic states of the Middle East30, which are undergoing their own Dark Age. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Morocco, Indonesia, Pakistan and Turkey see the most oppressive and violent actions towards Jews31,32. Jews in Muslim countries face a host of restrictions and "ceaseless humiliation and regular pogroms"33. In 2004 the European Union Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia reported on violent anti-Jew crimes in the EU and found that that largest group of perpetrators were young Muslim males34.
For more, see:
#2020s #equality #homosexuality #human_rights #ICCPR #intolerance #sexuality #tolerance
“Same-sex marriage has been legal in Mexico City since 2010. It is also permitted in 10 additional states (eight of which have reformed their local legislation to allow it and two where the Supreme Court invalidated articles of the local Civil Code, therefore permitting it without a legislative change). In 2015, the Supreme Court opened the door to recognition in all states by ruling that defining marriage exclusively as a union between a man and a woman constitutes discrimination and thus violates Mexico´s Constitution.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)12
| LGBT Equality in the 2020s Higher is better4 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | LGBT Equality in the 2020s Score4 | |
| 1= | Germany | 4.88 |
| 1= | Spain | 4.88 |
| 3 | Portugal | 4.81 |
| ... | ||
| 9 | USA | 4.68 |
| 10= | UK | 4.66 |
| 10= | Luxembourg | 4.66 |
| 12 | Mexico | 4.35 |
| 13 | Chile | 4.32 |
| 14 | Costa Rica | 3.93 |
| 15= | Uruguay | 3.81 |
| 15= | Denmark | 3.81 |
| The Americas Avg | 0.41 | |
| World Avg | -1.21 | |
| q=215. Also scored for 1970s-2020s. | ||
Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) folk is rife across the world. Legal restrictions co-exist alongside social stigmatisation and physical violence35. LGBT tolerance and equal rights have been fought for country-by-country against tightly entrenched cultural and religious opposition. Adult consensual sexual activity is a Human Right and protected by privacy laws36. Despite this, it is illegal to be homosexual in over 60 countries (as of 2025)37. The Vexen LGBT Equality Index as part of the Social and Moral Development Index grants points to each country depending on its LGBT stance since the 1970s38,39. Europe is by far the least prejudiced region, but in the Middle East and Africa cultural prejudice goes hand-in-hand with state intolerance, all too often including physical violence.
For more, see:
Homosexuality has been legal in Mexico since 1871, thanks to reforms influenced by the Napoleonic Code. ILGA researchers in 2017 found that Mexico had constitutional and legal protections against anti-LGBT employment discrimination, hate crime, incitement and other protections. Same-sex marriage became legal nationwide in 2022 after years of state-by-state progress, and adoption rights are recognized in many states. Mexico now has constitutional protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation, though enforcement varies regionally.Actions taken at the United Nations:
Averages by decade for Mexico (for the ranks, lower is better):
| LGBT Equality | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average | 2020s Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mexico: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 2.50 | 6.05 | 4.35 |
| World Rank: | 34th | ⇣ 42nd | ⇣ 49th | ⇡ 37th | ⇡ 8th | ⇣ 12th |
| World Avg: | -2.98 | -2.87 | -2.60 | -2.15 | -1.10 | -1.21 |
#europe #freedom_of_belief #freethought #human_rights #netherlands #religion #religious_tolerance #secularism #the_enlightenment
| Freedom of Thought Lower is better8 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20218 | |
| 1= | Belgium | 1.0 |
| 1= | Taiwan | 1.0 |
| 1= | Netherlands | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 88= | Uganda | 3.0 |
| 88= | Belize | 3.0 |
| 88= | Moldova | 3.0 |
| 88= | Mexico | 3.0 |
| 88= | Tuvalu | 3.0 |
| 88= | Australia | 3.0 |
| 88= | Lesotho | 3.0 |
| 88= | Switzerland | 3.0 |
| The Americas Avg | 2.7 | |
| World Avg | 3.0 | |
| q=196. | ||
Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Belief are upheld in Article 18 the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights40. It affirms that it is a basic human right that all people are free to change their beliefs and religion as they wish41. No countries voted against this (although eight abstained). This right was first recognized clearly in the policies of religious toleration of the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe in the post-enlightenment era42 of the 19th century. In democratic countries, freedom of belief and religion is now taken for granted43. In 2016 a study found that over 180 countries in the world had come to guarantee freedom of religion and belief44. The best countries at doing so are Belgium, The Netherlands and Taiwan8,45 and the worst: Afghanistan, N. Korea, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia8,46.
Long-term studies have shown that religious violence and persecution both decrease in cultures where religious freedom is guaranteed47. Despite this, there still are many who are strongly against freedom of belief41, including entire cultures and many individual communities of religious believers. Their alternative is that you are not free to believe what you want and they often state that you cannot change religion without being punished (often including the death penalty): this is bemoaned as one of the most dangerous elements of religion48 and "the denial of religious freedoms is inevitably intertwined with the denial of other freedoms"49 and the solution is, everywhere, to allow religious freedom and the freedom of belief.
For more, see:
"Mexico has been plagued with periods of violent religious persecution and conflict, especially in the state of Chiapas"50.