https://www.humantruth.info/nepal_human_rights_and_freedom.html
By Vexen Crabtree 2019
| Nepal [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
|---|---|
| Status | Independent State |
| Social and Moral Index | 112th best |
| Location | Asia |
| Population | 28.1m1 |
| Life Expectancy | 68.45yrs (2017)2 |
Nepal does relatively well in ensuring human rights and freedom, compared to many other countries. Nepal does better than average in combatting modern slavery3, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports4, freethought5, LGBT equality6, supporting press freedom7 and in its average Freedom in the World rating. But, there's bad news too. Nepal does worse than average in supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms8 (still low for Asia), opposing gender inequality9 and in its nominal commitment to Human Rights10.
#equality #freedom #gender_equality #human_rights #morals #nepal #politics #prejudice #tolerance
| Compared to Asia (2025)11 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank11 | |
| 1 | Japan | 34.7 |
| 2 | Taiwan | 42.4 |
| 3 | Cyprus | 43.8 |
| ... | ||
| 15 | Timor-Leste (E. Timor) | 95.1 |
| 16 | Sri Lanka | 95.2 |
| 17 | India | 97.2 |
| 18 | Nepal | 97.6 |
| 19 | Kyrgyzstan | 99.6 |
| 20 | Russia | 103.5 |
| 21 | Lebanon | 104.1 |
| 22 | Azerbaijan | 107.4 |
| 23 | Malaysia | 107.5 |
| Asia Avg | 103.00 | |
| q=52. | ||
| Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025)11 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank11 | |
| 1 | Sweden | 5.9 |
| 2 | Norway | 8.0 |
| 3 | Denmark | 8.1 |
| ... | ||
| 110 | Tunisia | 95.5 |
| 111 | Samoa | 95.7 |
| 112 | India | 97.2 |
| 113 | Nepal | 97.6 |
| 114 | Benin | 97.7 |
| 115 | Mali | 98.6 |
| 116 | Vanuatu | 98.7 |
| 117 | Kyrgyzstan | 99.6 |
| World Avg | 86.35 | |
| q=198. | ||
The best countries in the world at ensuring human rights, fostering equality and promoting tolerance, are Sweden, Norway and Denmark12. These countries are displaying the best traits that humanity has to offer. The worst countries are N. Korea, Somalia and Eritrea12.
25 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on supporting press freedom, combatting modern slavery, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms, its average Freedom in the World rating, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports, its nominal commitment to Human Rights, speed of uptake of HR treaties, opposing gender inequality, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators), the year from which women could participate in democracy, its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, LGBT equality and freethought. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe12, whereas the worst are The Middle East, Africa and Asia12.
For more, see:
Amnesty International's 2023-23 summary on human rights in Nepal stated:
“The authorities carried out arbitrary arrests to limit freedom of expression and security forces continued to use unnecessary and excessive force to disperse protests. At least one protester was shot dead. Efforts toward securing truth, justice and reparation for crimes under international law and other human rights violations committed during the 1996-2006 conflict remained grossly inadequate. The authorities failed to carry out credible and independent investigations into deaths in custody.”
"The State of the World's Human Rights 2022/23"
Amnesty International (2023)13
“Nepal´s transitional justice process has been plagued by a lack of political will from all parties, as well as the military. At least 13,000 people were killed and over 1,300 were forcibly disappeared during the country´s decade-long conflict [1996-2006], yet political leaders continue to neglect calls for accountability.”
"World Report 2018"
Human Rights Watch (2018)14
#democracy #freedom #Freedom_of_Speech #Good_Governance #mass_media #politics #UK
| Press Freedom Higher is better7 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20257 | |
| 1 | Norway | 92.31 |
| 2 | Estonia | 89.46 |
| 3 | Netherlands | 88.64 |
| ... | ||
| 86 | Argentina | 56.14 |
| 87 | Malaysia | 56.09 |
| 88 | Greece | 55.37 |
| 89 | Nepal | 55.20 |
| 90 | Northern Cyprus | 54.84 |
| 91 | Benin | 54.60 |
| 92 | Bolivia | 54.09 |
| 93 | Ecuador | 53.76 |
| Asia Avg | 39.69 | |
| World Avg | 54.65 | |
| q=179. | ||
The freedom to investigate, publish information, and have access to others' opinion is a fundamental part of today's information-driven world, and is linked with Freedom of Speech and Good Governance. Scores on the Press Freedom Index are calculated according to indicators including pluralism - the degree to which opinions are represented in the media, media independence of authorities, self-censorship, legislation, transparency and the infrastructure that supports news and information, and, the level of violence against journalists which includes lengths of imprisonments. The index "does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted". The rankings are used as one of the datasets of the Social and Moral Development Index15
It must be noted that press freedom is not an indicator of press quality and the press itself can be abusive; the UK suffers in particular from a popular brand of nasty reporting that infuses several of its newspapers who are particularly prone to running destructive and often untrue campaigns against victims. The Press Freedom Index notes that "the index should in no way be taken as an indicator of the quality of the media in the countries concerned".
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Nepal (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Press Freedom | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal: | 61.42 | 66.49 |
| World Rank: | 161st | ⇡ 107th |
| World Avg: | 27.44 | 65.91 |
#burundi #eritrea #human_rights #indonesia #slavery
| Slavery in the 2020s Lower is better3 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Total Per 10003 | |
| 1= | Switzerland | 0.50 |
| 1= | Norway | 0.50 |
| 3= | Germany | 0.60 |
| ... | ||
| 35 | Liberia | 3.10 |
| 36= | Chile | 3.20 |
| 36= | Costa Rica | 3.20 |
| 38= | Nepal | 3.30 |
| 38= | Togo | 3.30 |
| 38= | Italy | 3.30 |
| 38= | USA | 3.30 |
| 42= | Latvia | 3.40 |
| Asia Avg | 9.89 | |
| World Avg | 7.15 | |
| q=160. | ||
Modern slavery includes forced labour (often of the under-age), debt bondage (especially generational), sexual slavery, chattel slavery and other forms of abuse, some of which can be surprisingly difficult to detect, but often target those fleeing from warzones, and poverty-stricken vulnerable.16. Some industries (diamond, clothing, coal) from some countries (Burundi17, Eritrea17, Indonesia18) are a particular concern. The Walk Free Foundation, say in their 2023 report that 50 million people are living in modern slavery17.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Nepal (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Slavery | 2010s Average | 2020s Average |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal: | 6.00 | 3.30 |
| World Rank: | 113th | ⇡ 38th |
| World Avg: | 6.54 | 7.15 |
| Personal, Civil & Economic Freedom Lower is better8 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2014 Rank8 | |
| 1 | Hong Kong | 1 |
| 2 | Switzerland | 2 |
| 3 | New Zealand | 3 |
| ... | ||
| 81= | Benin | 79 |
| 82 | Brazil | 82 |
| 83 | Tajikistan | 83 |
| 84 | Nepal | 84 |
| 85= | Barbados | 85 |
| 85= | Rwanda | 85 |
| 87 | India | 87 |
| 88= | Burkina Faso | 88 |
| Asia Avg | 94.6 | |
| World Avg | 79.7 | |
| q=159. | ||
The Human Freedom Index published by the Fraser Institute is...
“... a broad measure of human freedom, understood as the absence of coercive constraint. It uses 79 distinct indicators of personal and economic freedom in the following areas: Rule of Law, Security and Safety, Movement, Religion, Association, Assembly, and Civil Society, Expression, Relationships, Size of Government, Legal System and Property Rights, Access to Sound Money, Freedom to Trade Internationally, Regulation of Credit, Labor, and Business. [...]
The highest levels of freedom are in Western Europe, Northern Europe, and North America (Canada and the United States. The lowest levels are in the Middle East and North Africa, South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. [...]
Countries in the top quartile of freedom enjoy a significant higher per capita income ($37,147) [compared with] the least-free quartile [at] $8,700). The HFI finds a strong correlation between human freedom and democracy.”
"The Human Freedom Index" by The Fraser Institute (2016)19
For more, see:
#freedom #human_rights #hungary #politics #USA
| Freedom in the World Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2024 Score | |
| 1= | Norway | 1.0 |
| 1= | Canada | 1.0 |
| 1= | Cape Verde | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 98= | Bolivia | 3.0 |
| 98= | Hungary | 3.0 |
| 100= | Papua New Guinea | 3.5 |
| 100= | Nepal | 3.5 |
| 100= | Mexico | 3.5 |
| 100= | Indonesia | 3.5 |
| 100= | Philippines | 3.5 |
| 100= | Serbia | 3.5 |
| Asia Avg | 5.0 | |
| World Avg | 3.7 | |
| q=205. | ||
Freedom House's long-standing annual report has been running since the 1970s, collecting data on political rights (PR) and civil liberties (CL). Their reports rate countries as "Free", "Partially Free" or "Not Free", however the results here are based on their numerical values. Many countries score the best combination of scores (1 and 1), which is why the table of results show many places equally placed in 1st place. In the past two decades, some well-established democracies like the USA and Hungary have been falling. Whilst most of the world in general is improving rights and freedoms over time, the 2020s has seen some regression.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Nepal (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Freedom in the World | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nepal: | 5.4 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 3.7 |
| World Rank: | 106th | ⇡ 67th | ⇣ 93rd | ⇣ 131st | ⇡ 115th |
| World Avg: | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| Human Rights Watch Comments Higher is better4 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2017 Score4 | |
| 1= | UK | 9 |
| 1= | France | 9 |
| 1= | Germany | 9 |
| ... | ||
| 38= | Norway | 1 |
| 38= | Panama | 1 |
| 40= | Ukraine | 0 |
| 40= | Nepal | 0 |
| 40= | S. Korea | 0 |
| 43= | Guatemala | -1 |
| 43= | Armenia | -1 |
| 43= | Ivory Coast | -1 |
| Asia Avg | -5.0 | |
| World Avg | -1.9 | |
| q=123. | ||
Human Rights Watch comments concentrate mostly on negative issues, however, they also make positive comments for those countries that engage in human rights defence around the world, or who make improvements at home. By adding up positive and negative comments (including double-points for negatives that involve large scales and crimes against humanity), the Social and Moral Index turns HRW commentary into quantified values. Some countries may be unfairly penalized because HRW have not examined them, and, some countries "get away" with abuses if they manage to hide it, or if it goes unnoticed - a negative point has been given for those countries in which HRW specifically state that access to investigators has been barred. The points were limited to a minimum of -10 because there are some points at which things are so bad, with abuses affecting so many, it is difficult to be more specific about the depths of the issues.
For more, see:
| Nominal Commitment to HR Higher is better10 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2009 Treaties10 | |
| 1 | Argentina | 24 |
| 2= | Chile | 23 |
| 2= | Costa Rica | 23 |
| ... | ||
| 132= | Gambia | 13 |
| 132= | Equatorial Guinea | 13 |
| 132= | Antigua & Barbuda | 13 |
| 132= | Nepal | 13 |
| 132= | Djibouti | 13 |
| 137= | Ethiopia | 12 |
| 137= | Haiti | 12 |
| 137= | Dominica | 12 |
| Asia Avg | 12.7 | |
| World Avg | 15.1 | |
| q=194. | ||
There are many international agreements on human rights, and, many mechanisms by which countries can be brought to account for their actions. Together, these have been the biggest historical movement in the fight against oppression and inhumanity. Or, putting it another way: these are rejected mostly by those who wish to oppress inhumanely. None of them are perfect and many people object to various components and wordings, but, no-one has come up with, and enforced, better methods of controlling the occasional desires that states and peoples have of causing angst for other states and peoples in a violent, unjust or inhumane way. Points are awarded for the number of human rights agreements ratified by the country, plus the acceptance of the petition mechanisms for disputes. The maximum possible score in 2009 was 24.
For more, see:
#human_rights #international_law #micronesia #politics #small_islands
| HR Treaties Lag Lower is better20 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2019 Avg Yrs/Treaty20 | |
| 1 | Ecuador | 2.15 |
| 2 | Uruguay | 2.25 |
| 3 | Tunisia | 3.65 |
| ... | ||
| 86 | Luxembourg | 9.67 |
| 87 | Nigeria | 9.71 |
| 88 | Vietnam | 9.72 |
| 89 | Nepal | 9.76 |
| 90 | S. Korea | 9.89 |
| 91 | Niger | 9.89 |
| 92 | Barbados | 9.94 |
| 93 | Algeria | 9.95 |
| Asia Avg | 10.97 | |
| World Avg | 10.02 | |
| q=195. | ||
Human Rights (HR) Treaties Lag is a count of how long it took each country to sign each of 11 key HR treaties. From the date of the first signatory of each treaty, all other countries have one point added to their score for each day they delayed in signing. Results are presented as average time in years to sign each one. The lower a country's score, the more enthusiastically it has taken on international Human Rights Treaties - which are, of course, minimal standards of good governance. The slowest are the countries of Micronesia, Melanesia, Australasia and Polynesia all lagged by over 12 years per treaty. The best regions are The Americas, Scandinavia and the Mediterranean.
For more, see:
The 1950s saw a late rush of 43 countries, including Nepal and many developing nations, move to cease preventing women from voting. Nepal is an unequal country, with male rights dominating those of women.
“Nepal has the third highest rate of child marriage in Asia–37 percent of girls are married before 18, and 10 percent by 15. Progress toward ending the practice has stalled. In 2016, the government launched a national strategy to end child marriage by 2030, but they have yet to announce any practical action plan.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)14
See:
#gender #gender_equality #human_rights #misogyny #women
| Gender Inequality Lower is better9 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20229 | |
| 1 | Denmark | 0.01 |
| 2 | Norway | 0.01 |
| 3 | Switzerland | 0.02 |
| ... | ||
| 121 | Cambodia | 0.49 |
| 122 | Syria | 0.49 |
| 123= | Ethiopia | 0.50 |
| 123= | Nepal | 0.50 |
| 125 | Swaziland | 0.50 |
| 126 | Bangladesh | 0.50 |
| 127 | Burundi | 0.50 |
| 128 | Senegal | 0.51 |
| Asia Avg | 0.33 | |
| World Avg | 0.34 | |
| q=166. | ||
The UN Human Development Reports include statistics on gender equality which take into account things like maternal mortality, access to political power (seats in parliament) and differences between male and female education rates. Gender inequality is not a necessary part of early human development. Although a separation of roles is almost universal due to different strengths between the genders, this does not have to mean that women are subdued, and, such patriarchalism is not universal in ancient history. Those cultures and peoples who shed, or never developed, the idea that mankind ought to dominate womankind, are better cultures and peoples than those who, even today, cling violently to those mores.
For more, see:
In the 1990s, Npeal was amongst the top 10 worst countries in the world for Gender Inequality. However, as data on more countries became available from the 2000s and as its situation slowly improved, its ranking rose in following decades.
Averages by decade for Nepal (for the ranks, lower is better):
| Gender Inequality | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nepal: | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.51 |
| World Rank: | 107th | ⇣ 123rd | ⇡ 121st |
| World Avg: | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.37 |
#christianity #gender_equality #human_rights #politics #women
| Year Women Can Vote Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Total Year | |
| 1 | New Zealand | 1893 |
| 2 | Australia | 1902 |
| 3 | Finland | 1906 |
| ... | ||
| 84= | Haiti | 1950 |
| 85= | Antigua & Barbuda | 1951 |
| 85= | Grenada | 1951 |
| 85= | Nepal | 1951 |
| 85= | Dominica | 1951 |
| 85= | St Kitts & Nevis | 1951 |
| 85= | St Vincent & Grenadines | 1951 |
| 91= | Bolivia | 1952 |
| Asia Avg | 1907 | |
| World Avg | 1930 | |
| q=189. | ||
Women now have equal rights in the vast majority of countries across the world. Although academic literature oftens talks of when a country "grants women the right to vote", this enforces a backwards way of thinking. Women always had the right to vote, however, they were frequently denied that right. The opposition to women's ability to vote in equality with man was most consistently and powerfully opposed by the Catholic Church, other Christian organisations, Islamic authorities and some other religious and secular traditionalists.
For more, see:
#equality #homosexuality #human_rights #ICCPR #intolerance #sexuality #tolerance
Same-sex relationships are not recognized by the government14, leading to legal bias and discrimination when access services and rights that couples normally enjoy.
| LGBT Equality Higher is better6 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2017 Score6 | |
| 1 | Netherlands | 103 |
| 2 | Belgium | 90 |
| 3 | Sweden | 86 |
| ... | ||
| 77= | Seychelles | 25 |
| 77= | Panama | 25 |
| 77= | Vietnam | 25 |
| 77= | Nepal | 25 |
| 77= | Cuba | 25 |
| 82= | Paraguay | 20 |
| 82= | Philippines | 20 |
| 82= | Central African Rep. | 20 |
| Asia Avg | -02.1 | |
| World Avg | 12.6 | |
| q=196. | ||
Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) folk is rife across the world. Legal restrictions co-exist alongside social stigmatisation and physical violence21. LGBT tolerance and equal rights have been fought for country-by-country across the world, often against tightly entrenched cultural and religious opposition. Adult consensual sexual activity is a Human Right, protected by privacy laws22. Despite this, homosexual activity is outlawed in around 80 countries21. The Social & Moral LGBT Equality Index was created to compare countries and regions, granting points to each country for a variety of factors including how long gay sex has been criminalized and the extent of LGBT legal rights. Graded negative points are given for criminality of homosexuality, unequal ages of consent, legal punishments and for not signing international accords on LGBT tolerance. The signs in many developed countries are positive, and things are gradually improving. Europe is by far the least prejudiced region (Scandinavia in particular being exemplary). The Middle East and then Africa are the least morally developed, where cultural bias goes hand-in-hand with state intolerance, all too often including physical violence.
For more, see:
#europe #freedom_of_belief #freethought #human_rights #netherlands #religion #religious_tolerance #secularism #the_enlightenment
| Freedom of Thought Lower is better5 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20215 | |
| 1= | Belgium | 1.0 |
| 1= | Taiwan | 1.0 |
| 1= | Netherlands | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 73= | Haiti | 2.8 |
| 73= | Portugal | 2.8 |
| 73= | Georgia | 2.8 |
| 73= | Nepal | 2.8 |
| 73= | Latvia | 2.8 |
| 73= | Monaco | 2.8 |
| 73= | Jamaica | 2.8 |
| 73= | Mauritius | 2.8 |
| Asia Avg | 3.7 | |
| World Avg | 3.0 | |
| q=196. | ||
Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Belief are upheld in Article 18 the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights23. It affirms that it is a basic human right that all people are free to change their beliefs and religion as they wish24. No countries voted against this (although eight abstained). This right was first recognized clearly in the policies of religious toleration of the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe in the post-enlightenment era25 of the 19th century. In democratic countries, freedom of belief and religion is now taken for granted26. In 2016 a study found that over 180 countries in the world had come to guarantee freedom of religion and belief27. The best countries at doing so are Belgium, The Netherlands and Taiwan5,28 and the worst: Afghanistan, N. Korea, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia5,29.
Long-term studies have shown that religious violence and persecution both decrease in cultures where religious freedom is guaranteed30. Despite this, there still are many who are strongly against freedom of belief24, including entire cultures and many individual communities of religious believers. Their alternative is that you are not free to believe what you want and they often state that you cannot change religion without being punished (often including the death penalty): this is bemoaned as one of the most dangerous elements of religion31 and "the denial of religious freedoms is inevitably intertwined with the denial of other freedoms"32 and the solution is, everywhere, to allow religious freedom and the freedom of belief.
For more, see: