Human Rights, Equality and Freedom in Angola
https://www.humantruth.info/angola_human_rights_and_freedom.html
By Vexen Crabtree 2018
| Angola Republic of Angola [Country Profile Page] |  |
|---|---|
| Status | Independent State |
| Social and Moral Index | 188th best |
| Location | Africa |
| Population | 30.8m1 |
| Life Expectancy | 61.64yrs (2017)2 |
Angola is amongst the worst places in the world at ensuring human rights and freedom, and it has severe cultural issues when it comes to tolerance and equality. Angola does worse than average in commentary in Human Rights Watch reports3 (still good for Africa), eliminating modern slavery4, supporting press freedom5, its average Freedom in the World rating, its nominal commitment to Human Rights6, freethought7 and in LGBT equality8. And finally, it falls into the worst-performing 20 in supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms9. Diamond extraction in Angola relies upon forced labour and child labour, and has done for decades10. Angola's security forces continue to use excessive force with almost no action taken by the government against even serious abusers11.
1. Angola's Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance
#angola #equality #freedom #gender_equality #human_rights #morals #politics #prejudice #tolerance
| Compared to Africa (2025)12 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank12 | |
| 1 | S. Africa | 55.8 |
| 2 | Seychelles | 64.8 |
| 3 | Cape Verde | 66.8 |
| ... | ||
| 44 | Zimbabwe | 134.5 |
| 45 | Chad | 134.6 |
| 46 | Equatorial Guinea | 135.4 |
| 47 | Angola | 136.1 |
| 48 | Comoros | 138.3 |
| 49 | Mauritania | 143.2 |
| 50 | Djibouti | 143.3 |
| 51 | Swaziland | 144.6 |
| 52 | Eritrea | 145.3 |
| Africa Avg | 110.0 | |
| q=54. | ||
| Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025)12 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank12 | |
| 1 | Sweden | 8.5 |
| 2 | Denmark | 13.5 |
| 3 | Norway | 13.5 |
| ... | ||
| 179 | Zimbabwe | 134.5 |
| 180 | Chad | 134.6 |
| 181 | Equatorial Guinea | 135.4 |
| 182 | Angola | 136.1 |
| 183 | Syria | 136.5 |
| 184 | Palestine | 137.8 |
| 185 | Saudi Arabia | 137.8 |
| 186 | Iran | 138.2 |
| World Avg | 87.8 | |
| q=200. | ||
The best countries in the world at ensuring human rights, fostering equality and promoting tolerance, are Sweden, Denmark and Norway13. These countries are displaying the best traits that humanity has to offer. The worst countries are Somalia, The Vatican City and Sudan13.
The data sets used to calculate points for each country are statistics on supporting press freedom, eliminating modern slavery, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms, its average Freedom in the World rating, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports, its nominal commitment to Human Rights, speed of uptake of HR treaties, opposing gender inequality, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators), the year from which women could participate in democracy, its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, LGBT equality and freethought. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe13, whereas the worst are Melanesia, The Middle East and Micronesia13.
For more, see:
Amnesty International's 2023-23 summary on human rights in Angola stated:
“Angola’s human rights record remained appalling. The pre- and post-election periods were mired in human rights violations including crackdowns on the right to peaceful assembly and protest, and the detention and torture of activists. In the south, extreme weather conditions, symptomatic of climate change, continued to impact the rights to food and water; and the associated humanitarian crisis remained unmitigated. Illegal occupation of communal grazing land in this region aggravated the dire conditions under which pastoralist communities lived.”
"The State of the World's Human Rights 2022/23" by Amnesty International (2023)14
Angola's security forces continue "to use excessive force with impunity. Authorities repeatedly failed to investigate and prosecute officers who committed abuses"11.
“Diamond extraction in Angola has over the past decades been linked to torture, murder, and forced displacement, and relies on both child labour and forced labour.”
"Global Slavery Index" by Walk Free Foundation (2018)10
2. Human Rights & Tolerance
2.1. Press Freedom
#democracy #freedom #Freedom_of_Speech #Good_Governance #mass_media #politics #UK
| Press Freedom Lower is better5 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20135 | |
| 1 | Finland | 638 |
| 2 | Netherlands | 648 |
| 3 | Norway | 652 |
| ... | ||
| 126 | Honduras | 3692 |
| 127 | Afghanistan | 3736 |
| 128 | Colombia | 3748 |
| 129 | Angola | 3780 |
| 130 | Libya | 3786 |
| 131 | Burundi | 3802 |
| 132 | Zimbabwe | 3812 |
| 133 | Jordan | 3847 |
| Africa Avg | 3511 | |
| World Avg | 3249 | |
| q=178. | ||
The freedom to investigate, publish information, and have access to others' opinion is a fundamental part of today's information-driven world, and is linked with Freedom of Speech and Good Governance. Scores on the Press Freedom Index are calculated according to indicators including pluralism - the degree to which opinions are represented in the media, media independence of authorities, self-censorship, legislation, transparency and the infrastructure that supports news and information, and, the level of violence against journalists which includes lengths of imprisonments. The index "does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted". The rankings are used as one of the datasets of the Social and Moral Development Index15
It must be noted that press freedom is not an indicator of press quality and the press itself can be abusive; the UK suffers in particular from a popular brand of nasty reporting that infuses several of its newspapers who are particularly prone to running destructive and often untrue campaigns against victims. The Press Freedom Index notes that "the index should in no way be taken as an indicator of the quality of the media in the countries concerned".
For more, see:
- "Human Rights" by Vexen Crabtree (2019).
2.2. Slavery
#burundi #eritrea #france #human_rights #indonesia #slavery
| Slavery Lower is better4 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2018 % Victims4 | |
| 1 | Japan | 0.03 |
| 2= | Canada | 0.05 |
| 2= | Taiwan | 0.05 |
| ... | ||
| 126 | Albania | 0.69 |
| 127= | Malaysia | 0.69 |
| 128 | Djibouti | 0.71 |
| 129 | Angola | 0.72 |
| 130 | Syria | 0.73 |
| 131 | Liberia | 0.74 |
| 132= | Guinea-Bissau | 0.75 |
| 132= | Madagascar | 0.75 |
| Africa Avg | 0.96 | |
| World Avg | 0.65 | |
| q=167. | ||
The taking of slaves has been an unwholesome feature of Human cultures since prehistory16. Private households and national endeavours have frequently been augmented with the use of slaves. The Egyptian and Roman empires both thrived on them for both purposes. Aside from labourers they are often abused sexually by their owners and their owners' friends17. The era of colonialism and the beginnings of globalisation changed nothing: the imprisonment and forced movements of labour continued to destroy many lives except that new justifications were invented based on Christian doctrine and the effort to convert non-Christians. By 1786 over 12 million slaves had been extracted from Africa and sent to colonial labour camps, with a truly atrocious condition of life18. But they were not the only ones to blame; in Africa internal nations such as the Asantes sold and bought tens of thousands of slaves19.
The abolition of the slave trade was a long and slow process. Until a relatively modern time, even philosophers, religious leaders and those concerned with ethics justified, or ignored, the problem of slavery20. The first abolitionists were always the slaves themselves. Their protests and rebellions caused the industry to become too expensive to continue. After that, it was the economic costs of maintain slave colonies that led the British to reject and then oppose the slave trade globally. Finally, the enlightenment-era thinkers of France encouraged moral and ethical thinking including the declaration of the inherent value of human life and human dignity21. A long-overdue wave of compassionate and conscientious movements swept across the West, eliminating public support for slavery, until the industries and churches that supported it had no choice but to back down.
'Modern slavery' includes forced labour (often of the under-age), debt bondage (especially generational), sexual slavery, chattel slavery and other forms of abuse, some of which can be surprisingly difficult to detect, but often target those fleeing from warzones and the vulnerable.22. Some industries (diamond, clothing, coal) from some countries (Burundi23, Eritrea23, Indonesia24) are a particular concern. The Walk Free Foundation, say that in 2016, 40.3 million people were living in modern slavery25.
For more, see:
2.3. Personal, Civil & Economic Freedom
| Personal, Civil & Economic Freedom Lower is better9 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2014 Rank9 | |
| 1 | Hong Kong | 1 |
| 2 | Switzerland | 2 |
| 3 | New Zealand | 3 |
| ... | ||
| 147= | Pakistan | 146 |
| 148 | Zimbabwe | 148 |
| 149 | Guinea | 149 |
| 150 | Angola | 150 |
| 151 | Congo, DR | 151 |
| 152 | Algeria | 152 |
| 153 | Myanmar (Burma) | 153 |
| 154 | Venezuela | 154 |
| Africa Avg | 114.2 | |
| World Avg | 79.7 | |
| q=159. | ||
The Human Freedom Index published by the Fraser Institute is...
“... a broad measure of human freedom, understood as the absence of coercive constraint. It uses 79 distinct indicators of personal and economic freedom in the following areas: Rule of Law, Security and Safety, Movement, Religion, Association, Assembly, and Civil Society, Expression, Relationships, Size of Government, Legal System and Property Rights, Access to Sound Money, Freedom to Trade Internationally, Regulation of Credit, Labor, and Business. [...]
The highest levels of freedom are in Western Europe, Northern Europe, and North America (Canada and the United States. The lowest levels are in the Middle East and North Africa, South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. [...]
Countries in the top quartile of freedom enjoy a significant higher per capita income ($37,147) [compared with] the least-free quartile [at] $8,700). The HFI finds a strong correlation between human freedom and democracy.”
"The Human Freedom Index" by The Fraser Institute (2016)26
For more, see:
- "Human Rights" by Vexen Crabtree (2019).
2.4. Freedom in the World
#freedom #human_rights #hungary #politics #USA
| Freedom in the World Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2024 Score | |
| 1= | Norway | 1.0 |
| 1= | Canada | 1.0 |
| 1= | Cape Verde | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 140 | Western Sahara | 5.5 |
| 141= | Algeria | 5.5 |
| 141= | Kosovo | 5.5 |
| 141= | Angola | 5.5 |
| 141= | Thailand | 5.5 |
| 141= | Palestine | 5.5 |
| 141= | Mali | 5.5 |
| 141= | Uganda | 5.5 |
| Africa Avg | 4.8 | |
| World Avg | 3.7 | |
| q=205. | ||
Freedom House's long-standing annual report has been running since the 1970s, collecting data on political rights (PR) and civil liberties (CL). Their reports rate countries as "Free", "Partially Free" or "Not Free", however the results here are based on their numerical values. Many countries score the best combination of scores (1 and 1), which is why the table of results show many places equally placed in 1st place. In the past two decades, some well-established democracies like the USA and Hungary have been falling. Whilst most of the world in general is improving rights and freedoms over time, the 2020s has seen some regression.
For more, see:
2.5. Human Rights Watch Comments
| Human Rights Watch Comments Higher is better3 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2017 Score3 | |
| 1= | UK | 9 |
| 1= | France | 9 |
| 1= | Germany | 9 |
| ... | ||
| 72 | Vietnam | -4 |
| 73= | Morocco | -4 |
| 73= | Thailand | -4 |
| 73= | Angola | -4 |
| 73= | Kyrgyzstan | -4 |
| 73= | Kuwait | -4 |
| 78 | Azerbaijan | -5 |
| 79= | China | -5 |
| Africa Avg | -5.6 | |
| World Avg | -1.9 | |
| q=123. | ||
Human Rights Watch comments concentrate mostly on negative issues, however, they also make positive comments for those countries that engage in human rights defence around the world, or who make improvements at home. By adding up positive and negative comments (including double-points for negatives that involve large scales and crimes against humanity), the Social and Moral Index turns HRW commentary into quantified values. Some countries may be unfairly penalized because HRW have not examined them, and, some countries "get away" with abuses if they manage to hide it, or if it goes unnoticed - a negative point has been given for those countries in which HRW specifically state that access to investigators has been barred. The points were limited to a minimum of -10 because there are some points at which things are so bad, with abuses affecting so many, it is difficult to be more specific about the depths of the issues.
For more, see:
- "Human Rights" by Vexen Crabtree (2019).
2.6. Nominal Commitment to HR
| Nominal Commitment to HR Higher is better6 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2009 Treaties6 | |
| 1 | Argentina | 24 |
| 2= | Chile | 23 |
| 2= | Costa Rica | 23 |
| ... | ||
| 140 | Central African Rep. | 12 |
| 141= | Bahrain | 12 |
| 141= | Israel | 12 |
| 141= | Angola | 12 |
| 141= | Suriname | 12 |
| 141= | Kuwait | 12 |
| 141= | Trinidad & Tobago | 12 |
| 141= | Lebanon | 12 |
| Africa Avg | 14.8 | |
| World Avg | 15.1 | |
| q=194. | ||
There are many international agreements on human rights, and, many mechanisms by which countries can be brought to account for their actions. Together, these have been the biggest historical movement in the fight against oppression and inhumanity. Or, putting it another way: these are rejected mostly by those who wish to oppress inhumanely. None of them are perfect and many people object to various components and wordings, but, no-one has come up with, and enforced, better methods of controlling the occasional desires that states and peoples have of causing angst for other states and peoples in a violent, unjust or inhumane way. Points are awarded for the number of human rights agreements ratified by the country, plus the acceptance of the petition mechanisms for disputes. The maximum possible score in 2009 was 24.
For more, see:
- "Human Rights" by Vexen Crabtree (2019).
2.7. HR Treaties Lag
#human_rights #international_law #micronesia #politics #small_islands
| HR Treaties Lag Lower is better27 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2019 Avg Yrs/Treaty27 | |
| 1 | Ecuador | 2.15 |
| 2 | Uruguay | 2.25 |
| 3 | Tunisia | 3.65 |
| ... | ||
| 119 | Qatar | 11.34 |
| 120 | Vatican City | 11.34 |
| 121 | Latvia | 11.39 |
| 122 | Angola | 11.59 |
| 123 | Cameroon | 11.63 |
| 124 | Sudan | 11.65 |
| 125 | Kazakhstan | 11.67 |
| 126 | Switzerland | 11.71 |
| Africa Avg | 9.88 | |
| World Avg | 10.02 | |
| q=195. | ||
Human Rights (HR) Treaties Lag is a count of how long it took each country to sign each of 11 key HR treaties. From the date of the first signatory of each treaty, all other countries have one point added to their score for each day they delayed in signing. Results are presented as average time in years to sign each one. The lower a country's score, the more enthusiastically it has taken on international Human Rights Treaties - which are, of course, minimal standards of good governance. The slowest are the countries of Micronesia, Melanesia, Australasia and Polynesia all lagged by over 12 years per treaty. The best regions are The Americas, Scandinavia and the Mediterranean.
For more, see:
3. Gender Equality
See:
The fact that the following events were even possible is a worrying sign for the state of Angola's moral and social development, however, there is still every chance that things are getting better:
“Women´s reproductive rights were threatened after parliament approved an amendment to the abortion law on February 24, making all abortions illegal [after] Parliament rejected [proposals to make some exceptions for health and rape] and punishable by 4-10 years´ imprisonment. Parliament passed the first reading of the bill without any public consultations, and activists accused parliamentarians of ignoring their views. The final vote on the draft penal code, which had been scheduled for March 23, was cancelled and the bill was withdrawn pending further debate after women marched on the streets supporting the right to abortion. At time of writing, a new version of the abortion bill had not been submitted to parliament.”
"World Report 2018" by Human Rights Watch (2018)11
3.1. Year Women Can Vote
#christianity #gender_equality #human_rights #politics #women
| Year Women Can Vote Lower is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Total Year | |
| 1 | New Zealand | 1893 |
| 2 | Australia | 1902 |
| 3 | Finland | 1906 |
| ... | ||
| 165= | Solomon Islands | 1974 |
| 166 | Sao Tome & Principe | 1975 |
| 167= | Cape Verde | 1975 |
| 167= | Angola | 1975 |
| 167= | Mozambique | 1975 |
| 170 | Portugal | 1976 |
| 171 | Guinea-Bissau | 1977 |
| 172 | Zimbabwe | 1978 |
| Africa Avg | 1961 | |
| World Avg | 1930 | |
| q=189. | ||
Women now have equal rights in the vast majority of countries across the world. Although academic literature oftens talks of when a country "grants women the right to vote", this enforces a backwards way of thinking. Women always had the right to vote, however, they were frequently denied that right. The opposition to women's ability to vote in equality with man was most consistently and powerfully opposed by the Catholic Church, other Christian organisations, Islamic authorities and some other religious and secular traditionalists.
For more, see:
4. Prejudice
4.1. LGBT Equality
#equality #homosexuality #human_rights #ICCPR #intolerance #sexuality #tolerance
| LGBT Equality Higher is better8 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 2017 Score8 | |
| 1 | Netherlands | 103 |
| 2 | Belgium | 90 |
| 3 | Sweden | 86 |
| ... | ||
| 174= | Iraq | -29 |
| 174= | Togo | -29 |
| 176 | Comoros | -30 |
| 177= | Angola | -30 |
| 177= | Uzbekistan | -30 |
| 177= | Tonga | -30 |
| 177= | Tuvalu | -30 |
| 181 | Mauritania | -32 |
| Africa Avg | -10.4 | |
| World Avg | 12.6 | |
| q=196. | ||
Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) folk is rife across the world. Legal restrictions co-exist alongside social stigmatisation and physical violence28. LGBT tolerance and equal rights have been fought for country-by-country across the world, often against tightly entrenched cultural and religious opposition. Adult consensual sexual activity is a Human Right, protected by privacy laws29. Despite this, homosexual activity is outlawed in around 80 countries28. The Social & Moral LGBT Equality Index was created to compare countries and regions, granting points to each country for a variety of factors including how long gay sex has been criminalized and the extent of LGBT legal rights. Graded negative points are given for criminality of homosexuality, unequal ages of consent, legal punishments and for not signing international accords on LGBT tolerance. The signs in many developed countries are positive, and things are gradually improving. Europe is by far the least prejudiced region (Scandinavia in particular being exemplary). The Middle East and then Africa are the least morally developed, where cultural bias goes hand-in-hand with state intolerance, all too often including physical violence.
For more, see:
4.2. Freedom of Thought
#europe #freedom_of_belief #freethought #human_rights #netherlands #religion #religious_tolerance #secularism #the_enlightenment
| Freedom of Thought Lower is better7 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pos. | 20217 | |
| 1= | Belgium | 1.0 |
| 1= | Netherlands | 1.0 |
| 1= | Taiwan | 1.0 |
| ... | ||
| 143 | Kazakhstan | 3.5 |
| 144= | Papua New Guinea | 3.5 |
| 144= | Nicaragua | 3.5 |
| 146 | Angola | 3.7 |
| 147= | Andorra | 3.7 |
| 147= | Uzbekistan | 3.7 |
| 149 | Myanmar (Burma) | 3.8 |
| 150= | Zimbabwe | 3.8 |
| Africa Avg | 3.1 | |
| World Avg | 3.0 | |
| q=196. | ||
Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Belief are upheld in Article 18 the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights30. It affirms that it is a basic human right that all people are free to change their beliefs and religion as they wish31. No countries voted against this (although eight abstained). This right was first recognized clearly in the policies of religious toleration of the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe in the post-enlightenment era32 of the 19th century. In democratic countries, freedom of belief and religion is now taken for granted33. In 2016 a study found that over 180 countries in the world had come to guarantee freedom of religion and belief34. The best countries at doing so are Taiwan, Belgium and The Netherlands7,35 and the worst: Afghanistan, N. Korea, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia7,36.
Long-term studies have shown that religious violence and persecution both decrease in cultures where religious freedom is guaranteed37. Despite this, there still are many who are strongly against freedom of belief31, including entire cultures and many individual communities of religious believers. Their alternative is that you are not free to believe what you want and they often state that you cannot change religion without being punished (often including the death penalty): this is bemoaned as one of the most dangerous elements of religion38 and "the denial of religious freedoms is inevitably intertwined with the denial of other freedoms"39 and the solution is, everywhere, to allow religious freedom and the freedom of belief.
For more, see:
40