The Human Truth Foundation

Human Rights and Freedom in Liechtenstein

https://www.humantruth.info/liechtenstein_human_rights_and_freedom.html

By Vexen Crabtree 2018

#china #Liechtenstein #liechtenstein_politics #mass_media #politics #russia

Liechtenstein
Principality of Liechtenstein

[Country Profile Page]
Flag
StatusIndependent State
Social and Moral Index15th best
LocationEurope
Population37 9101
Life Expectancy83.26yrs (2017)2

Liechtenstein performs very well in ensuring human rights and freedom compared to most other countries. Liechtenstein comes in the best 20 in supporting press freedom3. It does better than average when it comes to its nominal commitment to Human Rights4 (but low for Europe), commentary in Human Rights Watch reports5 (but low for Europe), LGBT equality in the 2020s6, its average Freedom in the World rating and in freethought7. Human Rights Watch has declared that Liechtenstein "has worked incredibly hard, beyond all expectations given its size and resources, to establish routes to combat mass genocide at the United Nations in circumstances where investigations are being blocked by countries such as Russia and China"8.


1. Liechtenstein's Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance

#china #equality #freedom #gender_equality #human_rights #liechtenstein #morals #politics #prejudice #russia #syria #tolerance

Compared to Europe (2025)9
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank9
1Sweden7.8
2Netherlands8.7
3Denmark8.8
...
28San Marino52.9
29Latvia54.0
30Croatia55.3
31Liechtenstein55.3
32Hungary58.2
33Monaco61.1
34Montenegro63.3
35Serbia67.5
36Bulgaria67.8
Europe Avg47.37
q=49.
Human Rights, Equality & Tolerance (2025)9
Pos.Lower is better
Avg Rank9
1Sweden7.8
2Netherlands8.7
3Denmark8.8
...
39Latvia54.0
40Brazil54.1
41Croatia55.3
42Liechtenstein55.3
43Hungary58.2
44Micronesia59.3
45Chile60.3
46Monaco61.1
World Avg89.80
q=199.

The best countries in the world at ensuring human rights, fostering equality and promoting tolerance, are Sweden, The Netherlands and Denmark10. These countries are displaying the best traits that humanity has to offer. The worst countries are Somalia, Eritrea and Saudi Arabia10.

31 datasets are used to calculate points for each country, including multiple decades of data on supporting press freedom, combatting modern slavery, supporting personal, civil & economic freedoms, its average Freedom in the World rating, commentary in Human Rights Watch reports, its nominal commitment to Human Rights, speed of uptake of HR treaties, opposing gender inequality, the rate of gender bias (from 7 indicators), the year from which women could participate in democracy, its success in fighting anti-semitic prejudice, LGBT equality and freethought. The regions with the best average results per country are Scandinavia, Baltic States and Europe10, whereas the worst are The Middle East, Africa and Asia10.

For more, see:

Liechtenstein has worked incredibly hard, beyond all expectations given its size and resources, to establish routes to combat mass genocide at the United Nations in circumstances where investigations are being blocked by countries such as Russia and China (i.e., blocking investigations into Syrian Government abuses). Liechtenstein rallied support and its evidence-gathering mechanism was passed 105 to 15 "possibly creating a special tribunal for Syria should Russia continue to block a path to justice at the ICC"8

2. Human Rights & Tolerance Datasets

2.1. Press Freedom

#democracy #freedom #Freedom_of_Speech #Good_Governance #mass_media #politics #UK

Press Freedom
Higher is better
3
Pos.20253
1Norway92.31
2Estonia89.46
3Netherlands88.64
...
9Switzerland83.98
10Czechia83.96
11Germany83.85
12Liechtenstein83.42
13Luxembourg83.04
14Lithuania82.27
15Latvia81.82
16New Zealand81.37
Europe Avg70.63
World Avg54.65
q=179.
Liechtenstein ranks 12th-best in the world in terms of supporting press freedom.

The freedom to investigate, publish information, and have access to others' opinion is a fundamental part of today's information-driven world, and is linked with Freedom of Speech and Good Governance. Scores on the Press Freedom Index are calculated according to indicators including pluralism - the degree to which opinions are represented in the media, media independence of authorities, self-censorship, legislation, transparency and the infrastructure that supports news and information, and, the level of violence against journalists which includes lengths of imprisonments. The index "does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted". The rankings are used as one of the datasets of the Social and Moral Development Index11

It must be noted that press freedom is not an indicator of press quality and the press itself can be abusive; the UK suffers in particular from a popular brand of nasty reporting that infuses several of its newspapers who are particularly prone to running destructive and often untrue campaigns against victims. The Press Freedom Index notes that "the index should in no way be taken as an indicator of the quality of the media in the countries concerned".

For more, see:

On average throughout the 2010s, Liechtenstein's rate was 84.04.

2.2. Freedom in the World

#freedom #human_rights #hungary #politics #USA

Freedom in the World
Lower is better
Pos.2024
Score
1=Norway1.0
1=Canada1.0
1=Cape Verde1.0
...
44=Belize1.5
44=Mongolia1.5
44=Lithuania1.5
44=Liechtenstein1.5
44=Grenada1.5
44=Latvia1.5
44=Bahamas1.5
51=Jamaica2.0
Europe Avg2.2
World Avg3.7
q=205.
Regarding its average Freedom in the World rating, Liechtenstein comes 42nd in the world.

Freedom House's long-standing annual report has been running since the 1970s, collecting data on political rights (PR) and civil liberties (CL). Their reports rate countries as "Free", "Partially Free" or "Not Free", however the results here are based on their numerical values. Many countries score the best combination of scores (1 and 1), which is why the table of results show many places equally placed in 1st place. In the past two decades, some well-established democracies like the USA and Hungary have been falling. Whilst most of the world in general is improving rights and freedoms over time, the 2020s has seen some regression.

For more, see:

Averages by decade for Liechtenstein (for the ranks, lower is better):

Freedom in the World1970s 
Average
1990s 
Average
2000s 
Average
2010s 
Average
Liechtenstein:3.01.01.01.2
World Rank:49th ⇡  1st1st ⇣  46th
World Avg:4.33.63.43.4

2.3. Human Rights Watch Comments

#human_rights

Human Rights Watch Comments
Higher is better
5
Pos.2017
Score5
1=UK9
1=France9
1=Germany9
...
31=Australia3
31=Hungary3
33=Gambia2
33=Liechtenstein2
33=Chile2
36=Paraguay1
36=Costa Rica1
36=Norway1
Europe Avg3.5
World Avg-1.9
q=123.
Liechtenstein ranks 33rd in the world with regard to commentary in Human Rights Watch reports.

Human Rights Watch comments concentrate mostly on negative issues, however, they also make positive comments for those countries that engage in human rights defence around the world, or who make improvements at home. By adding up positive and negative comments (including double-points for negatives that involve large scales and crimes against humanity), the Social and Moral Index turns HRW commentary into quantified values. Some countries may be unfairly penalized because HRW have not examined them, and, some countries "get away" with abuses if they manage to hide it, or if it goes unnoticed - a negative point has been given for those countries in which HRW specifically state that access to investigators has been barred. The points were limited to a minimum of -10 because there are some points at which things are so bad, with abuses affecting so many, it is difficult to be more specific about the depths of the issues.

For more, see:

2.4. Nominal Commitment to HR

#human_rights

Nominal Commitment to HR
Higher is better
4
Pos.2009
Treaties4
1Argentina24
2=Chile23
2=Costa Rica23
...
37=Slovakia20
37=Honduras20
37=S. Africa20
37=Liechtenstein20
37=Iceland20
37=Romania20
37=Bulgaria20
37=Burkina Faso20
Europe Avg19.5
World Avg15.1
q=194.
Liechtenstein is 29th in the world when it comes to its nominal commitment to Human Rights.

There are many international agreements on human rights, and, many mechanisms by which countries can be brought to account for their actions. Together, these have been the biggest historical movement in the fight against oppression and inhumanity. Or, putting it another way: these are rejected mostly by those who wish to oppress inhumanely. None of them are perfect and many people object to various components and wordings, but, no-one has come up with, and enforced, better methods of controlling the occasional desires that states and peoples have of causing angst for other states and peoples in a violent, unjust or inhumane way. Points are awarded for the number of human rights agreements ratified by the country, plus the acceptance of the petition mechanisms for disputes. The maximum possible score in 2009 was 24.

For more, see:

2.5. HR Treaties Lag

#human_rights #international_law #micronesia #politics #small_islands

HR Treaties Lag
Lower is better
12
Pos.2019
Avg Yrs/Treaty12
1Ecuador2.15
2Uruguay2.25
3Tunisia3.65
...
155Equatorial Guinea13.18
156Vanuatu13.21
157Guinea-Bissau13.23
158Liechtenstein13.28
159Ireland13.38
160Oman13.46
161Uzbekistan13.53
162Mauritania13.56
Europe Avg9.09
World Avg10.02
q=195.
Amongst the highest in Europe Liechtenstein is positioned 158th in the world regarding speed of uptake of HR treaties.

Human Rights (HR) Treaties Lag is a count of how long it took each country to sign each of 11 key HR treaties. From the date of the first signatory of each treaty, all other countries have one point added to their score for each day they delayed in signing. Results are presented as average time in years to sign each one. The lower a country's score, the more enthusiastically it has taken on international Human Rights Treaties - which are, of course, minimal standards of good governance. The slowest are the countries of Micronesia, Melanesia, Australasia and Polynesia all lagged by over 12 years per treaty. The best regions are The Americas, Scandinavia and the Mediterranean.

For more, see:

3. Gender Equality Datasets

See:

3.1. Year Women Can Vote

#christianity #gender_equality #human_rights #politics #women

Year Women Can Vote
Lower is better
Pos.Total
Year
1New Zealand1893
2Australia1902
3Finland1906
...
175=Micronesia1979
176=Iraq1980
176=Vanuatu1980
178Liechtenstein1984
179=Djibouti1986
179=Central African Rep.1986
181Namibia1989
182Samoa1990
Europe Avg1895
World Avg1930
q=189.
With regard to the year from which women could participate in democracy, Liechtenstein comes 10th-worst in the world.

Women now have equal rights in the vast majority of countries across the world. Although academic literature oftens talks of when a country "grants women the right to vote", this enforces a backwards way of thinking. Women always had the right to vote, however, they were frequently denied that right. The opposition to women's ability to vote in equality with man was most consistently and powerfully opposed by the Catholic Church, other Christian organisations, Islamic authorities and some other religious and secular traditionalists.

For more, see:

4. Prejudice Datasets

4.1. LGBT Equality in the 2020s

#equality #homosexuality #human_rights #ICCPR #intolerance #sexuality #tolerance

LGBT Equality in the 2020s
Higher is better
6
Pos.Total
Score6
1=Germany4.88
1=Spain4.88
3Portugal4.81
...
32Peru2.40
33Slovenia2.38
34Japan2.31
35Liechtenstein2.30
36Lithuania2.19
37Colombia2.18
38Greece2.12
39Andorra2.01
Europe Avg1.77
World Avg-1.21
q=215.
When it comes to LGBT equality in the 2020s, Liechtenstein ranks 35th in the world.

Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) folk is rife across the world. Legal restrictions co-exist alongside social stigmatisation and physical violence13. LGBT tolerance and equal rights have been fought for country-by-country against tightly entrenched cultural and religious opposition. Adult consensual sexual activity is a Human Right and protected by privacy laws14. Despite this, it is illegal to be homosexual in over 60 countries (as of 2025)15. The Vexen LGBT Equality Index as part of the Social and Moral Development Index grants points to each country depending on its LGBT stance since the 1970s16,17. Europe is by far the least prejudiced region, but in the Middle East and Africa cultural prejudice goes hand-in-hand with state intolerance, all too often including physical violence.

For more, see:

In Liechtenstein, after a period of legal prejudice, homosexuality was decriminalized in 1989, with the age of consent equalized in 2001. Sameā€`sex couples gained access to registered partnerships in 2011. Antiā€`discrimination protections based on sexual orientation were introduced in 2016. ILGA researchers in 2017 found that Liechtenstein had no legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination. Finally, sameā€`sex marriage and adoption rights became legal in Jan 2025.

Actions taken at the United Nations:

Averages by decade for Liechtenstein (for the ranks, lower is better):

LGBT Equality1970s 
Average
1980s 
Average
1990s 
Average
2000s 
Average
2010s 
Average
2020s 
Average
Liechtenstein:-5.00-4.450.504.852.802.30
World Rank:136th ⇡  128th ⇡  20th ⇡  17th ⇣  45th ⇡  35th
World Avg:-2.98-2.87-2.60-2.15-1.10-1.21

4.2. Freedom of Thought

#europe #freedom_of_belief #freethought #human_rights #netherlands #religion #religious_tolerance #secularism #the_enlightenment

Freedom of Thought
Lower is better
7
Pos.20217
1=Belgium1.0
1=Taiwan1.0
1=Netherlands1.0
...
42=Uruguay2.3
43Seychelles2.3
44=San Marino2.5
44=Liechtenstein2.5
44=Fiji2.5
44=Niger2.5
44=Senegal2.5
44=Kenya2.5
Europe Avg2.6
World Avg3.0
q=196.
When it comes to freethought, Liechtenstein ranks 44th in the world.

Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Belief are upheld in Article 18 the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights18. It affirms that it is a basic human right that all people are free to change their beliefs and religion as they wish19. No countries voted against this (although eight abstained). This right was first recognized clearly in the policies of religious toleration of the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe in the post-enlightenment era20 of the 19th century. In democratic countries, freedom of belief and religion is now taken for granted21. In 2016 a study found that over 180 countries in the world had come to guarantee freedom of religion and belief22. The best countries at doing so are Belgium, The Netherlands and Taiwan7,23 and the worst: Afghanistan, N. Korea, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia7,24.

Long-term studies have shown that religious violence and persecution both decrease in cultures where religious freedom is guaranteed25. Despite this, there still are many who are strongly against freedom of belief19, including entire cultures and many individual communities of religious believers. Their alternative is that you are not free to believe what you want and they often state that you cannot change religion without being punished (often including the death penalty): this is bemoaned as one of the most dangerous elements of religion26 and "the denial of religious freedoms is inevitably intertwined with the denial of other freedoms"27 and the solution is, everywhere, to allow religious freedom and the freedom of belief.

For more, see: