https://www.humantruth.info/cyprus_environment.html
By Vexen Crabtree 2025
Cyprus Republic of Cyprus [Country Profile Page] | ![]() |
---|---|
Status | Independent State |
Social and Moral Index | 29th best |
Capital | Nicosia |
Land Area | 9 240km21 |
Location | Asia, Europe, The Mediterranean, The Middle East |
Groupings | Small Islands |
Population | 1.2m2 |
Life Expectancy | 81.20yrs (2017)3 |
GNI | $38 188 (2017)4 |
ISO3166-1 Codes | CY, CYP, 1965 |
Internet Domain | .cy6 |
Currency | Euro (EUR)7 |
Telephone | +3578 |
Regarding its responsibility towards the environment, Cyprus is 44th in the world. This is computed from 21 data sets. Cyprus comes in the best 20 in the rate of rational beliefs on the environment in the population9 (amongst the best in The Mediterranean). It does better than average for its environmental performance10, its sign-up rate to major international accords on protecting the environment (one of the highest in The Mediterranean), energy to GDP efficiency11 and in its forested percent change 2000-202012 (but low for The Mediterranean). But, there's bad news too. Cyprus does worse than average in reducing annual meat consumption per person13.
#climate_change #the_environment
Compared to The Mediterranean (2025)14 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank14 | |
1 | Morocco | 46.5 |
2 | Spain | 59.5 |
3 | Tunisia | 60.1 |
4 | Greece | 61.4 |
5 | Italy | 63.1 |
6 | Cyprus | 64.8 |
7 | France | 72.8 |
8 | Turkey | 75.0 |
9 | Syria | 77.4 |
10 | Egypt | 78.0 |
11 | Algeria | 79.7 |
12 | Slovenia | 82.1 |
13 | Croatia | 88.5 |
The Mediterranean Avg | 80.97 | |
q=22. |
Responsibility Towards The Environment (2025)14 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | Lower is better Avg Rank14 | |
1 | Sri Lanka | 34.9 |
2 | Uruguay | 43.2 |
3 | Switzerland | 45.0 |
... | ||
41 | Gambia | 63.3 |
42 | Senegal | 63.4 |
43 | Hong Kong | 64.6 |
44 | Cyprus | 64.8 |
45 | Dominican Rep. | 65.0 |
46 | Ecuador | 65.6 |
47 | Hungary | 65.8 |
48 | Guatemala | 66.1 |
World Avg | 84.93 | |
q=199. |
All countries' current and historical approach towards the environment is gauged via 21 datasets, including multiple decades of data on its forested percent change 2000-2020, its environmental performance, energy to GDP efficiency, its sign-up rate to major international accords on protecting the environment, the rate of rational beliefs on the environment in the population, reducing annual meat consumption per person and its score on the Green Future Index.
The countries that do the best (Sri Lanka, Uruguay and Switzerland) tend to have avoided the excesses of early industrial countries, and have not yet repeated the same mistakes of environmental destruction - at least, not on the same scale. The regions with the best average results per country are Central America, South America and Scandinavia. The worst are Eritrea, The Vatican City and Timor-Leste (E. Timor), and the worst regions Micronesia, Australasia and Melanesia.
For more, see:
#biodiversity #deforestation #environmentalism #forests #over-exploitation #the_environment
Forest Area Change 2000-2020 Higher is better12 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | Total12 | |
1 | Guernsey | 82.6% |
2 | Bahrain | 75.2% |
3 | Iceland | 64.7% |
... | ||
78 | French Polynesia | 0.6% |
79 | Germany | 0.6% |
80 | Norway | 0.6% |
81 | Cyprus | 0.5% |
82 | New Zealand | 0.4% |
83 | Slovenia | 0.4% |
84 | Wallis & Futuna | 0.3% |
85 | Japan | 0.2% |
The Mediterranean Avg | 7.5% | |
World Avg | -0.1% | |
q=234. |
Forests are carbon sinks, mitigating against climate change15,16. Unfortunately, we are destroying over 70,000 km2 of forest each year17. In the last few thousand years, we've removed 30-40% of the Earth's forest cover18,16, mostly to clear space for agriculture, and for logging19,20. The produce from both is shipped from poorer countries to richer ones. Half-hearted government efforts and company obfuscation of supply chains makes it almost impossible for consumers to tell which foods and products are from sustainable sources, and which ones are encouraging irresponsible deforestation, meaning that there is little incentive for companies to relent.
The effects are catastrophic. 15% of all greenhouse gas emissions are the result of deforestation21,19. It brings soil erosion from wind and rain which, over time, can almost-permanently stop any hope of growing food22, and spreads desertification. Entire ecosystems are collapsing as a result, including ones that we depend upon23. The water cycle is driven by forests, and their loss reduces ordinary rainfall, increases flooding, removes an abundant source of water filtration, and contributes to a rise in water levels.24.
Some regions of the world are increasing their forest cover16; the best from 2000-2020 are Scandinavia (13.8% ), The Balkans (11.0% ) and Baltic States (7.6% )12. There is an overall trend that developed countries gathered their riches by using up their natural resources, and now, they pay poorer countries to use up theirs instead, whilst they can afford to slowly rebuild their natural environments. But it's not wholly that simple - some rich regions are still burning through what they've got. The regions clearing their forests fastest are Central America (-12.8% ), Africa (-9.1% ) and North America (-2.9% )12.
For more, see:
Averages by decade for Cyprus (for the ranks, lower is better):
Forest Area Change 2000-2020 | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
---|---|---|
Cyprus: | 0.7% | -0.2% |
World Rank: | 66th | ⇣ 150th |
World Avg: | 0.6% | -0.7% |
#climate_change #energy #sustainability #the_environment
Environmental Performance Higher is better10 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 201810 | |
1 | Switzerland | 87.4 |
2 | France | 84.0 |
3 | Denmark | 81.6 |
... | ||
21 | Australia | 74.1 |
22 | Greece | 73.6 |
23 | Taiwan | 72.8 |
24 | Cyprus | 72.6 |
25 | Canada | 72.2 |
26 | Portugal | 71.9 |
27 | USA | 71.2 |
28 | Slovakia | 70.6 |
The Mediterranean Avg | 65.8 | |
World Avg | 56.4 | |
q=180. |
The Environmental Performance Index 2018 data includes 24 indicators including air pollution, water and sanitation, biodiversity, ecosystems and environmental health, combined into a single score by country, by the Yale University Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
#energy #sustainability #the_environment
Energy to GDP Efficiency Lower is better11 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2022 Avg11 | |
1 | Rwanda | 0.25 |
2 | Chad | 0.26 |
3 | Tanzania | 0.31 |
... | ||
59 | Sao Tome & Principe | 0.88 |
60 | Germany | 0.91 |
61 | Palestine | 0.91 |
62 | Cyprus | 0.92 |
63 | Tunisia | 0.93 |
64 | Israel | 0.94 |
65 | Djibouti | 0.94 |
66 | France | 0.95 |
The Mediterranean Avg | 1.23 | |
World Avg | 1.23 | |
q=165. |
GDP per unit of energy consumption is often called 'Energy Intensity'. It's how efficient countries are at producing GDP in terms of primary energy use. It represents primary energy consumption using the substitution method, per unit of gross domestic product (GDP). A lower value means that less energy was used to maintain the country's GDP.
Averages by decade for Cyprus (for the ranks, lower is better):
Energy to GDP Efficiency | 1960s Average | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cyprus: | 1.76 | 2.17 | 1.84 | 1.78 | 1.46 | 1.15 |
World Rank: | 35th | ⇣ 39th | ⇣ 95th | ⇡ 94th | ⇣ 95th | ⇡ 89th |
World Avg: | 2.05 | 2.13 | 2.10 | 2.15 | 1.60 | 1.30 |
#environmentalism #internationalism
International Accords on the Environment Higher is better | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | Total Avg Rate | |
1 | Sweden | 83% |
2 | Canada | 82% |
3 | Norway | 81% |
... | ||
24 | Brazil | 71% |
25 | Chile | 71% |
26 | S. Africa | 71% |
27 | Cyprus | 71% |
28 | Japan | 70% |
29 | UK | 70% |
30 | Tunisia | 70% |
31 | Austria | 70% |
The Mediterranean Avg | 56.4% | |
World Avg | 57.5% | |
q=197. |
Each country is scored using a formula that takes the date each country took up major international environmental agreements, as a ratio of maximum possible days. The agreements covered are: (1) the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal, (2) the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides, (3) the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, (4) the Waigani Convention (for those countries that are eligible), (5) the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), (6) the Kyoto Protocol and (7) its successor, the Paris Agreement, (8) the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), (9) the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and finally, (10) the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer.
For more, see:
Cyprus enacted the Basel Convention on waste and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) both during their first year, and one of the early adopters of the Kyoto Protocol in 1999.“In 2023, Cyprus accounted for around 0.3% of the EU's net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and achieved a net emissions reduction of 5.6% compared with 2005. The country's total emissions decreased by 4.7% between 2005 and 2023, while its net carbon removals in the land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) sector increased by 36%. Emissions from sectors covered by the effort-sharing legislation have increased by 7.9% since 2005, and in 2023 were slightly higher than those from sectors under the EU emissions trading system (ETS), which were down 14.9% over the same period. Although Cyprus intends to reach zero net emissions in 2050, the level of progress towards the EU climate neutrality objective appears to be insufficient. [...] Almost half of Cyprus's national recovery and resilience plan, which includes a REPowerEU chapter, is dedicated to the green transition, with a focus on energy and transport.”
EU 2023 Climate Action Strategy25
Averages by decade for Cyprus (for the ranks, lower is better):
International Accords on the Environment | 1970s Average | 1980s Average | 1990s Average | 2000s Average | 2010s Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cyprus: | 45% | 33% | 62% | 88% | 98% |
World Rank: | 6th | ⇣ 42nd | ⇣ 47th | ⇡ 29th | ⇣ 70th |
World Avg: | 8.5% | 23.3% | 45.0% | 74.4% | 90.7% |
Rational Beliefs on the Environment Higher is better9 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2011 %9 | |
1 | Argentina | 78.3% |
2 | Greece | 77.6% |
3 | Brazil | 77.1% |
4 | Trinidad & Tobago | 74.5% |
5 | Costa Rica | 74.2% |
6 | Cyprus | 71.0% |
7 | Guatemala | 70.9% |
8 | Philippines | 70.8% |
9 | S. Korea | 70.7% |
10 | Colombia | 70.3% |
11 | Bolivia | 69.3% |
12 | Paraguay | 68.9% |
The Mediterranean Avg | 40.1% | |
World Avg | 39.9% | |
q=145. |
#animal_rights #animal_welfare #diet #food #health #meat #veganism #vegetarianism
Meat Consumption Lower is better13 | ||
---|---|---|
Pos. | 2021 kg13 | |
1 | Congo, DR | 03.0 |
2 | Burundi | 03.5 |
3 | Bangladesh | 04.3 |
... | ||
133 | Italy | 74.3 |
134 | Norway | 74.7 |
135 | Mexico | 75.4 |
136 | Cyprus | 75.8 |
137 | Austria | 76.4 |
138 | Germany | 76.6 |
139 | Greece | 76.8 |
140 | Serbia | 77.6 |
The Mediterranean Avg | 59.1 | |
World Avg | 52.5 | |
q=185. |
There are five key arguments in favour of vegetarianism which accrue even from partial adoption: (1) Vegetarian diets have notable health advantages over carnivorous diets, especially for heart and cardiovascular issues26,27,28. (2) It is morally better to avoid killing or harming animals. (3) Plant-based diets use much less water than carnivorous ones, to the extent that agricultural and water management scientists urge governments to encourage people to switch29. (4) Vegetarian food production uses substantially less land26,30,31. And, (5) vegetarianism is better for the environment than meat-production for emissions, sewerage, pollution and chemicals usage.26,30. A plant-based diet causes 75% less greenhouse gas emissions than a typical carnivorous diet31. The global food industry causes about 1/3 of all planet-heating emissions, and so "to slow the worst climate effects, the United Nations has called for a drastic reduction in meat consumption"31. Despite this, "reducing appetites for carbon-intensive meat and dairy is incredibly hard"32 and as countries get richer, they tend to eat more meat.
In the 2010s, meat consumption per person in Cyprus was well above the global average (of 49kgs per year), putting unnecessary strain on water supplies and the environment, although the rate during that decade was reducing.13
On average throughout the 2010s, Cyprus's rate was 77.7.