From the 1960s in the UK the dominant argument for EU membership has been economic1. Arguments for joining centered on increasing international (European) investments in the UK, and, reducing the outflow of capital to the 6 nations of the EU1.
The EU is heavily tied to our economy. It represents 508 million customers2, 200,000 UK businesses trade with it3 and 3.1 million jobs are "linked" to the EU4 (3.5 million according to ProEuropa5). "71% of all members of the Confederation of British Influence (CBI), and 67 per cent of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) [say] the EU has had an overall positive impact on their business"6. A poll by the British Chambers of Commerce found only 12 per cent of medium-sized business want to leave the EU and that big business is squarely pro-Europe7.
The EU adds 4.5% to our GDP (£62-78 billion per year) through economic and business benefits according to the CBI's estimate6 and we get £66 million investment every day from EU countries8. A UK Department for Business and Innovation Skills report in 2010 found that for a 14-year period across the whole EU the average GDP was 2.2% higher than it would have been without the Single Market9. Gordon Brown, a former Prime Minister, says that "nearly half the foreign direct investment we secure - £450 billion in total - comes from mainland Europe"10. Although as long ago as 2013 "associations representing investors from the USA, Germany, France, Ireland, Canada and Sweden voiced concerned that the UK government is dragging the debate on membership, making it difficult for businesses to plan and harming the UK economy"7, and reports in 2016 May surfaced of acute loss of investments due to the increasing risk of Brexit. There is simply no point producing goods in the UK to export to the EU if the UK is not a member.
Total savings of £3,000 for every family in the UK are attained by bringing many of these things together and calculating the net financial gain after deducting costs of EU membership, on average11.
44% of everything the UK sells abroad is bought in the EU5,6,8,12. If we left, we would cease to have any say in trading standards and requirements, but, we would still have to comply with all such rules. It is of great benefit to be part of the system rather than an outsider. Conversely, if we left this massive trading block will be swayed only very little by UK bartering as "less than 8% of EU exports come to the UK"12.
Prevention of tariffs and trade barriers in the EU8, almost completely. Tariffs massively harm economies across the rest of the world.
We benefit from EU free trade deals with over 50 countries around the world13, a massive effort that the UK simply doesn't have the bargaining power to orchestrate on its own. The rise of several economic superpowers has meant that most trade deals are now done inbetween economic blocs that surpass the UK in size and wealth, and who can negotiate better deals on account of their populations and economies. The EU, as a single block, is one of those bodies that can orchestrate the best deals. As a member of the EU, we benefit from this strength. If we left, the EU would become our largest competitor for global trade deals.5
EU membership makes it cheaper to import vital goods, saving us £11 billion and saving individual families on average £450 per year14.
The EU has made creating businesses easier, cheaper and quicker15. "Easier cross-border trade within the EU means that small- and medium-sized enterprises now have access to new export markets, which previously were not an option because of the cost and hassle that was involved with border bureaucracy"9. Because EU regulations are standardized many products can be made without having to create different models per country.
“It has become easier to start or buy a business with the average cost for setting up a new company in the former EU-15 has fallen from €813 in 2002 to €554 in 2007, and the time needed to cope with the administrative procedures to register a company was reduced from 24 days in 2002 to about 12 days in 2007.”
Department for Business and Skills (2010)
The UK receives considerable farming subsidies, helping 476,000 people in the UK6. "The average British farmer makes more money from European subsidies than from farming"16. Without this aid many farmers would go out of business17. Although we pay more into the Common Agricultural Policy than we get out, remember that the scheme as a total subsidizes food production throughout the EU which helps bring down the cost of food. The alternative is that all of us rely on expensive imports from further afield. If the UK leave the EU it will still have to import (lots of) food, but will have no say in its production or economies.
EU funding of assets from the Eden Project (£26 million) to Universities (£76 million in the SW alone) as a result of EU projects8.
EU-wide trademark protection: Since 2003, UK companies can "protect their trade marks and designs throughout the EU by making a single application for EU-wide registration. This cuts down bureaucracy - avoiding the need for trade marks or designs to be examined in 25 different jurisdictions each with its own rules"9. Before this, many trademark abuses simply went unchallenged, damaging business integrity especially in the long-term. The savings to businesses of this simplified scheme is incalculable.
The UK car industry depends on the EU18. The UK is the gateway to the EU for a wide range of South Korean, Japanese, Indian and American car producers - "they invest in Britain as their platform for investment in Europe", writes Gordon Brown, a previous UK Prime Minister and previous Chancellor of the Exchequer (the top politician responsible for economic and financial matters). Continued:
“The car industry thrives today not because of the domestic market but because nearly 80 per cent of its output is exported, most of it to Europe. [...] Access to the EU market means that 49 per cent of UK-produced vehicles are sold across the largest Single Market in the world, unhindered by any tariffs or costly regulatory barriers. [...] If we take motor trades as a whole, including wholesale and retail, we find that there are 240,000 auto-industry jobs associated with demand from the EU. [...]
The British car industry benefits from the tariff-free Single Market and from Europe's strength as a bloc in trade negotiations that set standards for the worldwide car industry. [...] Common regulation and standards are vital for manufacturers to compete across the Single Market. Standardisation of regulations at an EU-level removes the complexity and cost to conform with varying national standards.”
"Britain: Leading, Not Leaving: The Patriotic Case for Remaining in Europe"
Gordon Brown (2016)19
It is not just car manufacturing of course, in addition we produce nearly 1 million engines that are exported to Europe19. The UK can continue producing cars without the EU but local companies will face many awkward added complexities, tariffs will result in the UK being less competitive, and the attraction for companies to situation production in the UK will be somewhat lessened. Over time, loss of efficiency may endanger the entire native industry. The UK car industry is a beacon that highlights the benefits of EU membership.
The UK finance services industry depends on the EU18. 41% of the UK's financial services outputs are sold to the EU20. We are an ideal "gateway" for the entire world to the EU because English is the global language of finance, and because in terms of time zones the UK stock market bridges and connects the USA in the West to Tokyo and the rest of the East. Although we do also sell 26% of our financial services to the USA20, this will drop once we no longer provide internal access to the massive EU market.
“Financial services, account for 8 per cent of UK output and around 3½ per cent of our employment. The sector employs 1.1 million people in the UK, while almost another one million work in associated professional services, such as legal accountancy. Of these two million or so employees, more than half work outside London and the South-East. [...] Under the Single Market's single banking licence and common prudential and regulatory minimum standards, a bank located in one Member State is able to set up branches in others.”
"Britain: Leading, Not Leaving: The Patriotic Case for Remaining in Europe"
Gordon Brown (2016)21
Current edition: 2016 Jun 09
Last Modified: 2016 Dec 15
Parent page: UK Brexit from the EU: Disorganized, Unclear and Unprepared
All #tags used on this page - click for more:
#brexit #canada #eu #europe #france #germany #india #ireland #japan #korea,_south #politics #sweden #UK #USA
References: (What's this?)
The Independent. UK newspaper. See Which are the Best and Worst Newspapers in the UK?. Respectable and generally well researched UK broadsheet newspaper.
(2016) Europe & You: South West. Published by The In Campaign Ltd, London, UK. Dated January / February 2016. A newspaper-style leaflet delivered to homes in the South West. This body resulted from debates surrounding UK's possible exit from the EU, with a vote being held in 2016 Jun 23.
Brown, Gordon. Prime Minister of the UK 2007-2010 for the Labour Party.
(2016) Britain: Leading, Not Leaving: The Patriotic Case for Remaining in Europe. E-book. Amazon Kindle digital edition. Published by Deerpark Press, Selkirk, UK.
HM Government (UK)
(2016) Why the Government Believes that Voting to Remain in the European Union is the Best Decision for the UK. Paperback book. Published to argue the government's position ahead of the UK referendum on EU membership on 2016 Jun 23. Published in 2016 Apr, and delivered to households nationwide.
The Financial Times
(2013) Britain and the EU: In or Out?. E-book. Amazon Kindle digital edition. Drawn from articles originally published in the Financial Times between 1975 and March 2013.
- Brown (2016) chapter 2 "Missed opportunities, 1957-70" digital location 1114. Added to this page on 2017 Mar 12.^
- europa.eu/about-eu/facts-figures/living/index_en.htm accessed 2016 Apr 26.^
- Europe & You: South West (2016) citing HMRC.^
- Two sources for this information. (1) Centre for Economics and Business Research, released in October 2015 - The Independent (2016 Feb 04). (2) "Office for National Statistics and House of Commons Library" (no details given) in "Europe & You: South West" (2016).^
- ProEuropa.org.uk page Reasons to Stay, accessed 2016 Feb 11.^^^
- The Independent (2016 Feb 04) "What has the European Union ever done for us?" by Kayleigh Lewis.^^^^
- Article "Foreign investors split" by Brian Groom and Hannah Kuchler (2013 Jan 17). Groom is the FT's UK business editor, and has also been political editor and Europe editor. Kuchler is the UK news reporter and has worked at the FT since 2009. Reproduced in Financial Times (2013).^^
- Europe & You: South West (2016) .^^^^
- Department for Business and Innovation Skills page The Benefits and Achievements of EU Single Market. Accessed via a page archive dating from 2010 Aug 12, on 2016 Mar 01.^^^
- Brown (2016) digital location 155. Added to this page on 2016 Dec 15.^
- Europe & You: South West (2016) citing CBI and the Office for National Statistics.^
- HM Government (UK) (2016) .^
- Europe & You: South West (2016) cites the Office for National Statistics.^
- Europe & You: South West (2016) citing HMRC, the World Trade Organisation and the European Commission.^
- Added to this page on 2016 Dec 15.^
- Added to this page on 2016 Dec 15. The Times newspaper (2016 Nov 12) article "Betting the Farm"^
- The Telegraph article "How Brexit would affect British farmers" (2016 Feb 27), accessed 2016 Jun 09.^
- Added to this page on 2017 Mar 12.^^
- Brown (2016) chapter 7 "Can Europe help us create jobs?" digital location 2825-2882. Added to this page on 2017 Mar 12.^
- Brown (2016) chapter 7 "Can Europe help us create jobs?" digital location 3102. Added to this page on 2017 Mar 12.^
- Brown (2016) chapter 7 "Can Europe help us create jobs?" digital location 3088,3120. Added to this page on 2017 Mar 12.^